IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v186y2023i3p530-571.html

Words Matter

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Collins
  • Jeff DeWitt

Abstract

Twitter is regarded today as an essential communication platform of U.S. diplomacy. Of all diplomatic tweets, those published by U.S. presidents carry the greatest weight and hold great potential to influence perceptions of the country. In this study, we conduct cross‐presidential comparative analyses on an original dataset of over 2,000 tweets published by the first two presidents of the Twitter era. In particular, we test the commonly held notion that the substance and tone of Barack Obama's communication reflected positively on America's image abroad, with the potential to expand soft power—a vital foreign policy asset—while Donald Trump's communication reflected negatively on America's image, potentially eroding the nation's image and its soft power. Findings demonstrate that what and how presidents communicate on Twitter may produce profound and disparate impacts on America's image abroad and on U.S. soft power. Twitter es considerado hoy como una plataforma de comunicación esencial de la diplomacia estadounidense. De todos los tuits diplomáticos, los publicados por los presidentes de EE. UU. tienen el mayor peso y tienen un gran potencial para influir en las percepciones del país. En este estudio, llevamos a cabo análisis comparativos entre presidentes en un conjunto de datos original de más de 2000 tuits publicados por los dos primeros presidentes de la era de Twitter. En particular, probamos la noción común de que la sustancia y el tono de la comunicación de Barack Obama se reflejaron positivamente en la imagen de Estados Unidos en el extranjero, con el potencial de expandir el poder blando, un activo vital de la política exterior, mientras que la comunicación de Donald Trump se reflejó negativamente en la imagen de Estados Unidos, potencialmente erosionando la imagen de la nación y su poder blando. Los hallazgos demuestran que qué y cómo se comunican los presidentes en Twitter puede producir impactos profundos y dispares en la imagen de Estados Unidos en el extranjero y en el poder blando de Estados Unidos. 推特如今被视为美国外交的重要传播平台。在所有外交推文中,美国总统发布的推文影响力最大,并在影响该国感知方面存在巨大潜力。本研究中,我们对一项原始数据集进行比较分析,该数据集包括了推特时代下前两位总统发布的2,000多条推文。特别地,我们检验了一个普遍持有的观点,即巴拉克·奥巴马传播的内容和语气对美国的海外形象产生了积极影响,并有可能扩大软实力这一重要的外交政策资产,而唐纳德·特朗普传播的内容和语气对美国形象产生了消极影响,并可能侵蚀了国家形象和软实力。调查结果表明,总统在推特上传播的内容和传播方式可能会对美国的海外形象以及美国的软实力产生深远且迥然不同的影响。

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Collins & Jeff DeWitt, 2023. "Words Matter," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 186(3), pages 530-571, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:186:y:2023:i:3:p:530-571
    DOI: 10.1177/00438200231161631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200231161631
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00438200231161631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert J. Lieber, 2016. "Diplomacy's Aversion to Power," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 179(1), pages 35-45, June.
    2. Mikhaylov, Slava & Laver, Michael & Benoit, Kenneth R., 2012. "Coder Reliability and Misclassification in the Human Coding of Party Manifestos," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 78-91, January.
    3. Genevieve Gorrell & Kalina Bontcheva, 2016. "Classifying Twitter favorites: Like, bookmark, or Thanks?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(1), pages 17-25, January.
    4. Doyle, Michael W., 1986. "Liberalism and World Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 80(4), pages 1151-1169, December.
    5. Allyson L. Benton & Andrew Q. Philips, 2020. "Does the @realDonaldTrump Really Matter to Financial Markets?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(1), pages 169-190, January.
    6. Heleen Brans & Bert Scholtens, 2020. "Under his thumb the effect of president Donald Trump’s Twitter messages on the US stock market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-11, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandra Wankmüller, 2023. "A comparison of approaches for imbalanced classification problems in the context of retrieving relevant documents for an analysis," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 91-163, April.
    2. T. Clifton Morgan & Sally Howard Campbell, 1991. "Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(2), pages 187-211, June.
    3. Beth A. Simmons, 2002. "Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(6), pages 829-856, December.
    4. James Lee Ray, 2005. "Constructing Multivariate Analyses (of Dangerous Dyads)," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(4), pages 277-292, September.
    5. Enriqueta Aragonès & Dimitrios Xefteris, 2017. "Imperfectly Informed Voters And Strategic Extremism," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 58(2), pages 439-471, May.
    6. repec:osf:osfxxx:8h6fs_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Wockenfuß, Christof, 2009. "Demokratie durch Entwicklungskonkurrenz," Discussion Papers 2009-17, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    8. Lingyu Lu & Cameron G. Thies, 2010. "Trade Interdependence and the Issues at Stake in the Onset of Militarized Conflict," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 27(4), pages 347-368, September.
    9. Idean Salehyan, 2010. "The Delegation of War to Rebel Organizations," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 54(3), pages 493-515, June.
    10. David Brulé, 2006. "Congressional Opposition, the Economy, and U.S. Dispute Initiation, 1946-2000," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 50(4), pages 463-483, August.
    11. David Carment & Patrick James, 1995. "Internal Constraints and Interstate Ethnic Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(1), pages 82-109, March.
    12. Agrrawal, Pankaj & Agarwal, Rajat, 2023. "A Longer-Term evaluation of Information releases by Influential market Agents and the Semi-strong market Efficiency," EconStor Preprints 273555, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    13. Aritz Bilbao-Jayo & Aitor Almeida, 2018. "Automatic political discourse analysis with multi-scale convolutional neural networks and contextual data," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 14(11), pages 15501477188, November.
    14. Rauh, Christian, 2018. "Validating a sentiment dictionary for German political language—a workbench note," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(4), pages 319-343.
    15. Sally Anderson & Mark Souva, 2010. "The Accountability Effects of Political Institutions and Capitalism on Interstate Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 54(4), pages 543-565, August.
    16. Terrence L. Chapman, 2007. "International Security Institutions, Domestic Politics, and Institutional Legitimacy," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 51(1), pages 134-166, February.
    17. Kenneth Benoit, 1996. "Democracies Really Are More Pacific (in General)," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(4), pages 636-657, December.
    18. Russell J. Leng, 1993. "Reciprocating Influence Strategies in Interstate Crisis Bargaining," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(1), pages 3-41, March.
    19. Destradi, Sandra, 2010. "A Regional Power Promoting Democracy? India's Involvement in Nepal (2005-2008)," GIGA Working Papers 138, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    20. Michael W. Simon & Erik Gartzke, 1996. "Political System Similarity And The Choice of Allies," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(4), pages 617-635, December.
    21. Jennifer Brauner, 2015. "Military spending and democracy," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 409-423, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:186:y:2023:i:3:p:530-571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.