IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v2y1999i4p217-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing system development projects for organizational integration

Author

Listed:
  • Tyson R. Browning

Abstract

In complex system development projects, integrated product teams (IPTs) may be used to develop various system components. Many have struggled to determine the characteristics of highly effective IPTs and the circumstances in which particular perspectives should be incorporated within an IPT. However, much less research has addressed the nature and management of the relationships between IPTs—the integration of IPTs within a project. While many have lamented that coordination problems have played a large part in diminishing the performance of their projects, a systematic approach for considering these issues a priori, during the organization design activity, is lacking. This paper describes a framework for thinking about organizational integration within a project and develops a systematic approach for designing organizations, design for integration (DFI), that explicitly considers integration needs. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Syst Eng 2: 217–225, 1999

Suggested Citation

  • Tyson R. Browning, 1999. "Designing system development projects for organizational integration," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(4), pages 217-225.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:2:y:1999:i:4:p:217-225
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1999)2:43.0.CO;2-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1999)2:43.0.CO;2-9
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1999)2:43.0.CO;2-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tyson R. Browning, 1998. "Integrative mechanisms for multiteam integration: Findings from five case studies," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 95-112.
    2. Pimmler, Thomas U. (Thomas Udo) & Eppinger, Steven D., 1994. "Integration analysis of product decompositions," Working papers 3690-94., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    3. McCord, Kent R. (Kent Richard) & Eppinger, Steven Daniel., 1993. "Managing the integration problem in concurrent engineering," Working papers 3594-93., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Biren (Brian) Prasad, 2002. "Building blocks for a decision‐based integrated product development and system realization process," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 123-144.
    2. Mark S. Avnet, 2016. "A Network‐Based Analysis of Team Coordination and Shared Cognition in Systems Engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5), pages 395-408, September.
    3. Shawn T. Collins & Ali A. Yassine & Stephen P. Borgatti, 2009. "Evaluating product development systems using network analysis," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 55-68, March.
    4. Ali A. Yassine & Luke A. Wissmann, 2007. "The Implications of Product Architecture on the Firm," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 118-137, June.
    5. Bohdan W. Oppenheim, 2004. "Lean product development flow," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 1-1.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jukrin Moon & Dongoo Lee & Taesik Lee & Jaemyung Ahn & Jindong Shin & Kyungho Yoon & Dongsik Choi, 2015. "Group Decision Procedure to Model the Dependency Structure of Complex Systems: Framework and Case Study for Critical Infrastructures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 323-338, July.
    2. Staudenmayer, Nancy A. (Nancy Ann), 1997. "Interdependency : conceptual, empirical, & practical issues," Working papers 162-97. Working paper (Sl, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    3. M. D. Guenov & S. G. Barker, 2005. "Application of axiomatic design and design structure matrix to the decomposition of engineering systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 29-40.
    4. Alan MacCormack & John Rusnak & Carliss Y. Baldwin, 2006. "Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1015-1030, July.
    5. Henning Skirde & Wolfgang Kersten & Meike Schröder, 2016. "Measuring the Cost Effects of Modular Product Architectures — A Conceptual Approach," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(04), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Staudenmayer, Nancy A. (Nancy Ann) & Cusumano, Michael A., 1954-, 1998. "Alternative designs for product component integration," Working papers WP 4016-98., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    7. Sosa, Manuel E., 2003. "Factors that influence technical communication in distributed product development : an empirical study in the telecommunications industry," Working papers WP 4123-00., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    8. Morelli, Mark Damian. & Eppinger, Steven D. & Gulati, Rosaline K. & International Center for Research on the Management of Technology., 1995. "Predicting technical communication in product development organizations," Working papers 3602-95, 1995. WP (Intern, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    9. Kartik Kalaignanam & Tarun Kushwaha & Anand Nair, 2017. "The Product Quality Impact of Aligning Buyer-Supplier Network Structure and Product Architecture: an Empirical Investigation in the Automobile Industry," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Cabigiosu, Anna & Zirpoli, Francesco & Camuffo, Arnaldo, 2013. "Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 662-675.
    11. Rashmi Jain & Anithashree Chandrasekaran & Ozgur Erol, 2010. "A systems integration framework for process analysis and improvement," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 274-289, September.
    12. Avner Engel & Tyson R. Browning, 2008. "Designing systems for adaptability by means of architecture options," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 125-146, June.
    13. Tobias K.P. Holmqvist & Magnus L. Persson, 2003. "Analysis and improvement of product modularization methods: Their ability to deal with complex products," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 195-209.
    14. Tyson R. Browning, 1999. "Sources of schedule risk in complex system development," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3), pages 129-142.
    15. Fleming, Lee & Sorenson, Olav, 2001. "Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1019-1039, August.
    16. Michael P. Voigt & Daniel Roth & Matthias Kreimeyer, 2023. "Decision Support for Defining Adaptive Façade Design Goals in the Early Design Phase," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-28, April.
    17. Fine, Charles H. & Whitney, Daniel E., 1996. "Is the make-buy decision process a core competence?," Working papers #140-96. Working paper (S, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    18. Samuel Son & Junhong Kim & Jangwon Lee & Jaemyung Ahn, 2019. "Improving supply chain management process using design structure matrix based cross‐functional analysis," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 313-329, July.
    19. Habib, Tufail & Kristiansen, Jimmi Normann & Rana, Mohammad Bakhtiar & Ritala, Paavo, 2020. "Revisiting the role of modular innovation in technological radicalness and architectural change of products: The case of Tesla X and Roomba," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    20. Bernardo A. Delicado & Alejandro Salado & Rafael Mompó, 2018. "Conceptualization of a T‐Shaped engineering competency model in collaborative organizational settings: Problem and status in the Spanish aircraft industry," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(6), pages 534-554, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:2:y:1999:i:4:p:217-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.