IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v5y2002i2p123-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building blocks for a decision‐based integrated product development and system realization process

Author

Listed:
  • Biren (Brian) Prasad

Abstract

A key requirement, in a distributed product development environment at General Motors, was to provide a series of quantitative and qualitative mechanisms for integrating competing information from distributed agents. Such mechanisms must also account for provisions for combining different opinions, for resolving conflicts, and for finding a feasible or optimal solution at the end. We, at Electronic Data Systems (EDS), General Motors Account, developed a Decision‐based Integrated Product Development (DIPD) methodology to capture a system‐level optimization formulation as part of a product design, development and delivery (PD3) process. The paper describes this methodology in the context of system‐level optimization. DIPD employs the inputs, requirement, constraints, and output conventions to formulate the product realization problem in a distributed manner. The purpose of this DIPD methodology is to improve the performance characteristics of the product, process, and organization (PPO) relative to automobile consumer needs and expectations. DIPD builds the theory through a systematic revision and extension of the paradigms introduced earlier by optimization experts and practitioners including this author [Prasad, 1996]. The eight parts of this DIPD methodology, called building blocks, are discussed at length in this paper. The first four blocks, 1–4, provide a conceptual framework for understanding the challenges and opportunities in DIPD. The last four parts, 5–8, of this methodology provide the building blocks for an analytical and conceptual framework for decision‐making, PPO improvements, and a large‐scale system optimization. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 5: 123–144, 2002

Suggested Citation

  • Biren (Brian) Prasad, 2002. "Building blocks for a decision‐based integrated product development and system realization process," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 123-144.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:5:y:2002:i:2:p:123-144
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.10008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.10008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.10008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tyson R. Browning, 1999. "Designing system development projects for organizational integration," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(4), pages 217-225.
    2. Agrell, Per J., 1994. "A multicriteria approach to concurrent engineering," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 99-113, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shawn T. Collins & Ali A. Yassine & Stephen P. Borgatti, 2009. "Evaluating product development systems using network analysis," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 55-68, March.
    2. Ali A. Yassine & Luke A. Wissmann, 2007. "The Implications of Product Architecture on the Firm," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 118-137, June.
    3. Bock, Stefan & Pütz, Markus, 2017. "Implementing Value Engineering based on a multidimensional quality-oriented control calculus within a Target Costing and Target Pricing approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 146-158.
    4. Agrell, Per J., 1995. "A multicriteria framework for inventory control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-3), pages 59-70, October.
    5. Mark S. Avnet, 2016. "A Network‐Based Analysis of Team Coordination and Shared Cognition in Systems Engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5), pages 395-408, September.
    6. Bohdan W. Oppenheim, 2004. "Lean product development flow," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:5:y:2002:i:2:p:123-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.