IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v12y2009i3p265-273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Whole‐brain thinking in systems architecting

Author

Listed:
  • Tony Di Carlo
  • Behrokh Khoshnevis
  • Firdaus Udwadia

Abstract

This position paper† explores the role of whole‐brain thinking in the context of systems architecting. Brain research indicates that the brain is dual and that each of its hemispheres interprets the world differently; the concept is commonly referred to as right‐brain and left‐brain thinking, or sometimes R‐mode and L‐mode for short. L‐mode denotes step‐by‐step linear thinking. R‐mode is integrative and holistic. It pays to extend this to systems architecting. For example, there may be two ways to look at complexity, analytically and holistically. Step‐by‐step analysis is well suited for low‐dimensional complexity. As complexity increases methodical analytical skills become overwhelmed and we are bogged down, maybe even forced into complacent partial representation—tunnel vision. Learning to “see” the complex may benefit from a shift from the analytical to the holistic, from L‐mode to R‐mode thinking, or a better blending of the two. We begin with a cursory review of brain theory and applications thereof in drawing, management and creativity theory, and then follow up with observations of blended L/R‐mode thinking in the context of systems architecting. Our hope is to distill from these sources whole‐brain mental strategies that may be relevant to systems architects. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng

Suggested Citation

  • Tony Di Carlo & Behrokh Khoshnevis & Firdaus Udwadia, 2009. "Whole‐brain thinking in systems architecting," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 265-273, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:12:y:2009:i:3:p:265-273
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20121
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moti Frank & David Elata, 2005. "Developing the capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST) of freshman engineering students," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 187-195.
    2. Charles N. Calvano & Philip John, 2004. "Systems engineering in an age of complexity," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 25-34.
    3. Linda P. Beckerman, 2000. "Application of complex systems science to systems engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 96-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George A. Polacek & David A. Gianetto & Khaldoun Khashanah & Dinesh Verma, 2012. "On principles and rules in complex adaptive systems: A financial system case study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 433-447, December.
    2. J. Park & T. P. Seager & P. S. C. Rao & M. Convertino & I. Linkov, 2013. "Integrating Risk and Resilience Approaches to Catastrophe Management in Engineering Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 356-367, March.
    3. Kelley E. Dugan & Erika A. Mosyjowski & Shanna R. Daly & Lisa R. Lattuca, 2022. "Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A systematic literature review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 840-866, July.
    4. Brian Sauser, 2006. "Toward mission assurance: a framework for systems engineering management," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 213-227, September.
    5. Moti Frank, 2010. "Assessing the interest for systems engineering positions and other engineering positions' required capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST)," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 161-174, June.
    6. Maroño, M. & Peña, J.A. & Santamaría, J., 2006. "The ‘PROCESO’ index: a new methodology for the evaluation of operational safety in the chemical industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 349-361.
    7. Giorgio Locatelli, 2018. "Why are Megaprojects, Including Nuclear Power Plants, Delivered Overbudget and Late? Reasons and Remedies," Papers 1802.07312, arXiv.org.
    8. Lindbom, Hanna & Tehler, Henrik & Eriksson, Kerstin & Aven, Terje, 2015. "The capability concept – On how to define and describe capability in relation to risk, vulnerability and resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 45-54.
    9. Felicia Ramona BIRAU, 2012. "The implications of chaos theory on Bucharest stock exchange," Anale. Seria Stiinte Economice. Timisoara, Faculty of Economics, Tibiscus University in Timisoara, vol. 0, pages 36-41, May.
    10. Marcus A. Bellamy & Rahul C. Basole, 2013. "Network analysis of supply chain systems: A systematic review and future research," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 235-249, June.
    11. Aharon Gero, 2014. "Improving Systems Thinking Skills Of Second Year Engineering Students By An Introductory Project," Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Sciendo, vol. 1(1), pages 95-98, August.
    12. Benjamin Donald Oakes & Lars‐Göran Mattsson & Per Näsman & Andrés Alayón Glazunov, 2018. "A Systems‐Based Risk Assessment Framework for Intentional Electromagnetic Interference (IEMI) on Critical Infrastructures," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(6), pages 1279-1305, June.
    13. Anders Jensen & Terje Aven, 2017. "Hazard/threat identification: Using functional resonance analysis method in conjunction with the Anticipatory Failure Determination method," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(4), pages 383-389, August.
    14. T.C. Kouloura & K.N. Genikomsakis & A.L. Protopapas, 2008. "Energy management in buildings: A systems approach," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 263-275, September.
    15. Jason E. Bartolomei & Daniel E. Hastings & Richard de Neufville & Donna H. Rhodes, 2012. "Engineering Systems Multiple‐Domain Matrix: An organizing framework for modeling large‐scale complex systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 41-61, March.
    16. Moti Frank, 2006. "Knowledge, abilities, cognitive characteristics and behavioral competences of engineers with high capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST)," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 91-103, June.
    17. Charles N. Calvano & Philip John, 2004. "Systems engineering in an age of complexity," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 25-34.
    18. Nathan J. Slegers & Ronald T. Kadish & Gary E. Payton & John Thomas & Michael D. Griffin & Dan Dumbacher, 2012. "Learning from failure in systems engineering: A panel discussion," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 74-82, March.
    19. Greco, Marco & Grimaldi, Michele & Locatelli, Giorgio & Serafini, Mattia, 2021. "How does open innovation enhance productivity? An exploration in the construction ecosystem," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:12:y:2009:i:3:p:265-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.