IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v8y2005i2p187-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing the capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST) of freshman engineering students

Author

Listed:
  • Moti Frank
  • David Elata

Abstract

In this study, the affect of a project‐based learning introductory course on the Capacity for Engineering Systems Thinking (CEST) of freshman students is considered. The qualitative paradigm was found to be appropriate for this study because the focus was on learning processes and the development of concepts. Four aspects of engineering systems thinking were evident in the students' responses: conceptualization, requirements, alternatives, and optimum. It is found that the extent of these four aspects is related to the students' ability to design and develop a new product. During this study, it became clear that a quantitative tool for assessing CEST is currently not available, and that such a tool is needed. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 8: 187–195, 2005

Suggested Citation

  • Moti Frank & David Elata, 2005. "Developing the capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST) of freshman engineering students," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 187-195.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:8:y:2005:i:2:p:187-195
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moti Frank, 2006. "Knowledge, abilities, cognitive characteristics and behavioral competences of engineers with high capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST)," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 91-103, June.
    2. Moti Frank, 2010. "Assessing the interest for systems engineering positions and other engineering positions' required capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST)," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 161-174, June.
    3. Aharon Gero, 2014. "Improving Systems Thinking Skills Of Second Year Engineering Students By An Introductory Project," Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Sciendo, vol. 1(1), pages 95-98, August.
    4. Kelley E. Dugan & Erika A. Mosyjowski & Shanna R. Daly & Lisa R. Lattuca, 2022. "Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A systematic literature review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 840-866, July.
    5. Tony Di Carlo & Behrokh Khoshnevis & Firdaus Udwadia, 2009. "Whole‐brain thinking in systems architecting," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 265-273, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:8:y:2005:i:2:p:187-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.