IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v24y2004i4p803-815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Risk of Invasive Spread in Fragmented Landscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Kimberly A. With

Abstract

Little theoretical work has investigated how landscape structure affects invasive spread, even though broad‐scale disturbances caused by habitat loss and fragmentation are believed to facilitate the spread of exotic species. Neutral landscape models (NLMs), derived from percolation theory in the field of landscape ecology, provide a tool for assessing the risk of invasive spread in fragmented landscapes. A percolation‐based analysis of the potential for invasive spread in fragmented landscapes predicts that invasive spread may be enormously enhanced beyond some threshold level of habitat loss, which depends upon the species' dispersal abilities and the degree of habitat fragmentation. Assuming that invasive species spread primarily through disturbed areas of the landscape, poor dispersers may spread better in landscapes in which disturbances are concentrated in space, whereas good dispersers are predicted to spread better in landscapes where disturbances are small and dispersed (i.e., fragmented landscape). Assessing the risk of invasive spread in fragmented landscapes ultimately requires understanding the relative effects of landscape structure on processes that contribute to invasive spread—dispersal (successful colonization) and demography (successful establishment). Colonization success is predicted to be highest when >20% of the landscape has been disturbed, particularly if disturbances are large or aggregated in space, because propagules are more likely to encounter sites suitable for colonization and establishment. However, landscape pattern becomes less important for predicting colonization success if species are capable of occasional long‐distance dispersal events. Invasive species are also more likely to persist and achieve positive population growth rates (successful establishment) in landscapes with clumped disturbance patterns, which can then function as population sources that produce immigrants that invade other landscapes. Finally, the invasibility of communities may be greatest in landscapes with a concentrated pattern of disturbance, especially below some critical threshold of biodiversity. Below the critical biodiversity threshold, the introduction of a single species can trigger a cascade of extinctions among indigenous species. The application of NLMs may thus offer new insights and opportunities for the management and restoration of landscapes so as to slow the spread of invasive species.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimberly A. With, 2004. "Assessing the Risk of Invasive Spread in Fragmented Landscapes," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 803-815, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:24:y:2004:i:4:p:803-815
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00480.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00480.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00480.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy H. Keitt, 1997. "Stability and Complexity on a Lattice: Coexistence of Species in an Individual-Based Food Web Model," Working Papers 97-02-015, Santa Fe Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Drechsler & Julia Touza & Piran White & Glyn Jones, 2016. "Agricultural landscape structure and invasive species: the cost-effective level of crop field clustering," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 111-121, February.
    2. Papaïx, Julien & Touzeau, Suzanne & Monod, Hervé & Lannou, Christian, 2014. "Can epidemic control be achieved by altering landscape connectivity in agricultural systems?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 284(C), pages 35-47.
    3. de-Camino-Beck, T. & Lewis, M.A., 2009. "Invasion with stage-structured coupled map lattices: Application to the spread of scentless chamomile," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3394-3403.
    4. Le Maitre, David C. & Krug, Rainer M. & Hoffmann, John H. & Gordon, Anthony J. & Mgidi, Theresa N., 2008. "Hakea sericea: Development of a model of the impacts of biological control on population dynamics and rates of spread of an invasive species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 342-358.
    5. Andrew M. Deines & Valerie C. Chen & Wayne G. Landis, 2005. "Modeling the Risks of Nonindigenous Species Introductions Using a Patch‐Dynamics Approach Incorporating Contaminant Effects as a Disturbance," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1637-1651, December.
    6. Duncan A. Robertson, 2019. "Spatial Transmission Models: A Taxonomy and Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 225-243, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:24:y:2004:i:4:p:803-815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.