IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/perpro/v36y2025i2p302-318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advances in Permafrost Representation: Biophysical Processes in Earth System Models and the Role of Offline Models

Author

Listed:
  • Heidrun Matthes
  • Adrien Damseaux
  • Sebastian Westermann
  • Christian Beer
  • Aaron Boone
  • Eleanor Burke
  • Bertrand Decharme
  • Hélène Genet
  • Elchin Jafarov
  • Moritz Langer
  • Frans‐Jan Parmentier
  • Philipp Porada
  • Anna Gagne‐Landmann
  • Deborah Huntzinger
  • Brendan M. Rogers
  • Christina Schädel
  • Tobias Stacke
  • Jon Wells
  • William R. Wieder

Abstract

Permafrost is undergoing rapid changes due to climate warming, potentially exposing a vast reservoir of carbon to be released to the atmosphere, causing a positive feedback cycle. Despite the importance of this feedback, its specifics remain poorly constrained, because representing permafrost dynamics still poses a significant challenge for Earth System Models (ESMs). This review assesses the current state of permafrost representation in land surface models (LSMs) used in ESMs and offline permafrost models, highlighting both the progress made and the remaining gaps. We identify several key physical processes crucial for permafrost dynamics, including soil thermal regimes, freeze–thaw cycles, and soil hydrology, which are underrepresented in many models. While some LSMs have advanced significantly in incorporating these processes, others lack fundamental elements such as latent heat of freeze–thaw, deep soil columns, and Arctic vegetation dynamics. Offline permafrost models provide valuable insights, offering detailed process testing and aiding the prioritization of improvements in coupled LSMs. Our analysis reveals that while significant progress has been made in incorporating permafrost‐related processes into coupled LSMs, many small‐scale processes crucial for permafrost dynamics remain underrepresented. This is particularly important for capturing the complex interactions between physical and biogeochemical processes required to model permafrost carbon dynamics. We recommend leveraging advancements from offline permafrost models and progressively integrating them into LSMs, while recognizing the computational and technical challenges that may arise in coupled simulations. We highlight the importance of enhancing the representation of physical processes, including through improvements in model resolution and complexity, as this is a fundamental precursor to accurately incorporate biogeochemical processes and capture the permafrost carbon feedback.

Suggested Citation

  • Heidrun Matthes & Adrien Damseaux & Sebastian Westermann & Christian Beer & Aaron Boone & Eleanor Burke & Bertrand Decharme & Hélène Genet & Elchin Jafarov & Moritz Langer & Frans‐Jan Parmentier & Phi, 2025. "Advances in Permafrost Representation: Biophysical Processes in Earth System Models and the Role of Offline Models," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 302-318, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:302-318
    DOI: 10.1002/ppp.2269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2269
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ppp.2269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelle R. McCrystall & Julienne Stroeve & Mark Serreze & Bruce C. Forbes & James A. Screen, 2021. "New climate models reveal faster and larger increases in Arctic precipitation than previously projected," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Jacqueline Oehri & Gabriela Schaepman-Strub & Jin-Soo Kim & Raleigh Grysko & Heather Kropp & Inge Grünberg & Vitalii Zemlianskii & Oliver Sonnentag & Eugénie S. Euskirchen & Merin Reji Chacko & Giovan, 2022. "Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Boris K. Biskaborn & Sharon L. Smith & Jeannette Noetzli & Heidrun Matthes & Gonçalo Vieira & Dmitry A. Streletskiy & Philippe Schoeneich & Vladimir E. Romanovsky & Antoni G. Lewkowicz & Andrey Abramo, 2019. "Permafrost is warming at a global scale," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Jan Hjort & Olli Karjalainen & Juha Aalto & Sebastian Westermann & Vladimir E. Romanovsky & Frederick E. Nelson & Bernd Etzelmüller & Miska Luoto, 2018. "Degrading permafrost puts Arctic infrastructure at risk by mid-century," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongwei Wang & Huijun Jin & Tao Che & Xiaoying Li & Liyun Dai & Yuan Qi & Chunlin Huang & Ruixia He & Jinlong Zhang & Rui Yang & Dongliang Luo & Xiaoying Jin, 2024. "Influences of Snow Cover on the Thermal Regimes of Xing'an Permafrost in Northeast China in 1960s–2010s," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 188-201, April.
    2. Eirini Makopoulou & Alix Varnajot, 2025. "Permafrost degradation-induced risks for nature-based tourism in the Arctic – case from the Yukon," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(5), pages 1-9, May.
    3. Georgii A. Alexandrov & Veronika A. Ginzburg & Gregory E. Insarov & Anna A. Romanovskaya, 2021. "CMIP6 model projections leave no room for permafrost to persist in Western Siberia under the SSP5-8.5 scenario," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Vladimir P. Melnikov & Victor I. Osipov & Anatoly V. Brouchkov & Arina A. Falaleeva & Svetlana V. Badina & Mikhail N. Zheleznyak & Marat R. Sadurtdinov & Nikolay A. Ostrakov & Dmitry S. Drozdov & Alex, 2022. "Climate warming and permafrost thaw in the Russian Arctic: potential economic impacts on public infrastructure by 2050," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(1), pages 231-251, May.
    5. Efrén López-Blanco & Elmer Topp-Jørgensen & Torben R. Christensen & Morten Rasch & Henrik Skov & Marie F. Arndal & M. Syndonia Bret-Harte & Terry V. Callaghan & Niels M. Schmidt, 2024. "Towards an increasingly biased view on Arctic change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(2), pages 152-155, February.
    6. Shijin Wang, 2024. "Opportunities and threats of cryosphere change to the achievement of UN 2030 SDGs," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. K. M. Walter Anthony & P. Anthony & N. Hasson & C. Edgar & O. Sivan & E. Eliani-Russak & O. Bergman & B. J. Minsley & S. R. James & N. J. Pastick & A. Kholodov & S. Zimov & E. Euskirchen & M. S. Bret-, 2024. "Upland Yedoma taliks are an unpredicted source of atmospheric methane," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Rashit M. Hantemirov & Christophe Corona & Sébastien Guillet & Stepan G. Shiyatov & Markus Stoffel & Timothy J. Osborn & Thomas M. Melvin & Ludmila A. Gorlanova & Vladimir V. Kukarskih & Alexander Y. , 2022. "Current Siberian heating is unprecedented during the past seven millennia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    9. Chen, Lin & Lai, Yuanming & Fortier, Daniel & Harris, Stuart A., 2022. "Impacts of snow cover on the pattern and velocity of air flow in air convection embankments of sub-Arctic regions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1033-1046.
    10. Juan Pedro Rodríguez-López & Chihua Wu & Tatiana A. Vishnivetskaya & Julian B. Murton & Wenqiang Tang & Chao Ma, 2022. "Permafrost in the Cretaceous supergreenhouse," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. N. A. Serova & V. A. Serova, 2021. "Transport Infrastructure of the Russian Arctic: Specifics Features and Development Prospects," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 214-220, March.
    12. B. N. Porfiriev & D. O. Eliseev, 2023. "Scenario Forecasts of Expected Damage from Permafrost Degradation: Regional and Industry Issues," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 651-659, October.
    13. Troy J. Bouffard & Ekaterina Uryupova & Klaus Dodds & Vladimir E. Romanovsky & Alec P. Bennett & Dmitry Streletskiy, 2021. "Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Ying Guo & Shuai Liu & Lisha Qiu & Chengcheng Zhang & Wei Shan, 2024. "Spatial stratified heterogeneity analysis of field scale permafrost in Northeast China based on optimal parameters-based geographical detector," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Jacqueline Oehri & Gabriela Schaepman-Strub & Jin-Soo Kim & Raleigh Grysko & Heather Kropp & Inge Grünberg & Vitalii Zemlianskii & Oliver Sonnentag & Eugénie S. Euskirchen & Merin Reji Chacko & Giovan, 2022. "Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Clare B Gaffey & Narissa Bax & Naomi Krauzig & Kévin Tougeron, 2024. "A call to strengthen international collaboration to assess climate change effects in polar regions," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-25, October.
    17. Stepan Prokopievich Varlamov & Yuri Borisovich Skachkov & Pavel Nikolaevich Skryabin, 2021. "Long-Term Variability in Ground Thermal State in Central Yakutia’s Tuymaada Valley," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Ping Lu & Jiangping Han, 2025. "Remote Sensing for Identification and Mapping of Thermokarst Landforms: A Review," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 329-342, June.
    19. Xiangdong Zhao & Naihua Xue & Hu Yang & Daran Zheng & Jungang Peng & Joost Frieling & David Vleeschouwer & Xuewu Fu & Wanglu Jia & Yanan Fang & Sha Li & Meng Wang & Xianye Zhao & Qiang Wang & Haichun , 2025. "Climate–carbon-cycle interactions and spatial heterogeneity of the late Triassic Carnian pluvial episode," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Jannik Martens & Birgit Wild & Igor Semiletov & Oleg V. Dudarev & Örjan Gustafsson, 2022. "Circum-Arctic release of terrestrial carbon varies between regions and sources," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:36:y:2025:i:2:p:302-318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1530 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.