IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v40y2020i1p65-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reluctant policy innovation through profit concession and informality tolerance: A strategic relational view of policy entrepreneurship in China's urban redevelopment

Author

Listed:
  • Fox Z.Y. Hu
  • George C.S. Lin
  • Anthony G.O. Yeh
  • Shenjing He
  • Xingjian Liu

Abstract

This paper engages with the theoretical perspective of policy entrepreneurship to examine the pattern and process of policy change in the context of China's urban redevelopment. Drawing upon a strategic‐relational reinterpretation of policy entrepreneurship, this paper identifies a distinctive form of reluctant policy innovation in the “three old renewals” scheme initiated in Guangzhou where profit concession and informality tolerance were practiced to create a small window of opportunity for the project of urban redevelopment to break ground. The motivation of policy entrepreneurship in the successful urban renewal projects in Guangzhou was heavily contingent upon the geographically important location of the project site and the historically incidence of hosting the 2010 Asian Games, which forced municipal government to become entrepreneurial and innovative in decision making and income redistribution in order to get things done as quickly as possible. The distinct fashion of policy innovation identified in the case of Guangzhou points to the polymorphous and dynamic nature of policy entrepreneurship and advocates a relational treatment of the strategies and motives of policy entrepreneurs embedded in concrete geographical and historical context.

Suggested Citation

  • Fox Z.Y. Hu & George C.S. Lin & Anthony G.O. Yeh & Shenjing He & Xingjian Liu, 2020. "Reluctant policy innovation through profit concession and informality tolerance: A strategic relational view of policy entrepreneurship in China's urban redevelopment," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1), pages 65-75, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:40:y:2020:i:1:p:65-75
    DOI: 10.1002/pad.1866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1866
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pad.1866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xufeng Zhu, 2008. "Strategy of Chinese policy entrepreneurs in the third sector: challenges of “Technical Infeasibility”," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 41(4), pages 315-334, December.
    2. Him Chung & Su-Hong Zhou, 2011. "Planning for Plural Groups? Villages-in-the-city Redevelopment in Guangzhou City, China," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 333-353.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sang Hun Lim, 2021. "Welfare state and the social economy in compressed development: Self‐sufficiency organizations in South Korea," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(5), pages 267-278, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Yuchen & Yuan, Yu, 2022. "Assessing the energy resources policy agenda: Evidence from China's green express policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Gu, Zhonghua & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2021. "Framing social sustainability and justice claims in urban regeneration: A comparative analysis of two cases in Guangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Babayan Ararat & Schlaufer Caroline & Uldanov Artem, 2021. "A policy window and a network of global and local policy entrepreneurs: The introduction of opioid substitution therapy in Belarus," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, December.
    4. H Chung, 2018. "Rural migrants in villages-in-the-city in Guangzhou, China: Multi-positionality and negotiated living strategies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(10), pages 2245-2260, August.
    5. Nihit Goyal & Michael Howlett & Namrata Chindarkar, 2020. "Who coupled which stream(s)? Policy entrepreneurship and innovation in the energy–water nexus in Gujarat, India," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1), pages 49-64, February.
    6. Liu, Dawei & Yamaguchi, Kensuke & Yoshikawa, Hisashi, 2017. "Understanding the motivations behind the Myanmar-China energy pipeline: Multiple streams and energy politics in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 403-412.
    7. Edoardo Bruno, 2022. "Socio-Spatial ‘Tabula Rasa’ and Punctual Preservation: The Case Study of Measurable Compensation in Lijiao Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Wang, Boyi & Tian, Li & Yao, Zhihao, 2018. "Institutional uncertainty, fragmented urbanization and spatial lock-in of the peri-urban area of China: A case of industrial land redevelopment in Panyu," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 241-249.
    9. Him Chung, 2013. "The Spatial Dimension of Negotiated Power Relations and Social Justice in the Redevelopment of Villages-in-the-City in China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(10), pages 2459-2476, October.
    10. Neomi Frisch Aviram & Nissim Cohen & Itai Beeri, 2020. "Policy entrepreneurship in developing countries: A systematic review of the literature," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1), pages 35-48, February.
    11. Yanliu Lin & Pu Hao & Stan Geertman, 2015. "A conceptual framework on modes of governance for the regeneration of Chinese ‘villages in the city’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(10), pages 1774-1790, August.
    12. Caner Bakir & K. Aydin Gunduz, 2020. "The importance of policy entrepreneurs in developing countries: A systematic review and future research agenda," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1), pages 11-34, February.
    13. McCagh, Christine & Sneddon, Joanne & Blache, Dominque, 2015. "Killing sharks: The media’s role in public and political response to fatal human–shark interactions," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 271-278.
    14. Karita Kan, 2019. "Accumulation without Dispossession? Land Commodification and Rent Extraction in Peri‐urban China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 633-648, July.
    15. Ling Hin Li, 2015. "State or market: the role of the government in urban village regeneration in China," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 157-167, July.
    16. Gao, Yunjiao & Atkinson-Sheppard, Sally & Yu, Yanping & Xiong, Guibin, 2018. "A review of the national policies on street children in China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 79-87.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:40:y:2020:i:1:p:65-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.