IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v67y2020i5p303-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A model of supply‐chain decisions for resource sharing with an application to ventilator allocation to combat COVID‐19

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjay Mehrotra
  • Hamed Rahimian
  • Masoud Barah
  • Fengqiao Luo
  • Karolina Schantz

Abstract

We present a stochastic optimization model for allocating and sharing a critical resource in the case of a pandemic. The demand for different entities peaks at different times, and an initial inventory for a central agency are to be allocated. The entities (states) may share the critical resource with a different state under a risk‐averse condition. The model is applied to study the allocation of ventilator inventory in the COVID‐19 pandemic by FEMA to different U.S. states. Findings suggest that if less than 60% of the ventilator inventory is available for non‐COVID‐19 patients, FEMA's stockpile of 20 000 ventilators (as of March 23, 2020) would be nearly adequate to meet the projected needs in slightly above average demand scenarios. However, when more than 75% of the available ventilator inventory must be reserved for non‐COVID‐19 patients, various degrees of shortfall are expected. In a severe case, where the demand is concentrated in the top‐most quartile of the forecast confidence interval and states are not willing to share their stockpile of ventilators, the total shortfall over the planning horizon (until May 31, 2020) is about 232 000 ventilator days, with a peak shortfall of 17 200 ventilators on April 19, 2020. Results are also reported for a worst‐case where the demand is at the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval. An important finding of this study is that a central agency (FEMA) can act as a coordinator for sharing critical resources that are in short supply over time to add efficiency in the system. Moreover, through properly managing risk‐aversion of different entities (states) additional efficiency can be gained. An additional implication is that ramping up production early in the planning cycle allows to reduce shortfall significantly. An optimal timing of this production ramp‐up consideration can be based on a cost‐benefit analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjay Mehrotra & Hamed Rahimian & Masoud Barah & Fengqiao Luo & Karolina Schantz, 2020. "A model of supply‐chain decisions for resource sharing with an application to ventilator allocation to combat COVID‐19," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(5), pages 303-320, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:67:y:2020:i:5:p:303-320
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21905
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21905?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozgur Araz & Alison Galvani & Lauren Meyers, 2012. "Geographic prioritization of distributing pandemic influenza vaccines," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 175-187, September.
    2. Benjamin Armbruster & Margaret Brandeau, 2007. "Contact tracing to control infectious disease: when enough is enough," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 341-355, December.
    3. Yisha Xiang & Jun Zhuang, 2016. "A medical resource allocation model for serving emergency victims with deteriorating health conditions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(1), pages 177-196, January.
    4. Stephanie Earnshaw & Katherine Hicks & Anke Richter & Amanda Honeycutt, 2007. "A linear programming model for allocating HIV prevention funds with state agencies: a pilot study," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 239-252, September.
    5. Steffen Flessa, 2000. "Where efficiency saves lives: A linear programme for the optimal allocation of health care resources in developing countries," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 249-267, June.
    6. Hui Cao & Simin Huang, 2012. "Principles of Scarce Medical Resource Allocation in Natural Disaster Relief," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(3), pages 470-476, May.
    7. Yen-Yi Feng & I-Chin Wu & Tzu-Li Chen, 2017. "Stochastic resource allocation in emergency departments with a multi-objective simulation optimization algorithm," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 55-75, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Cao & Feng Zhen & Hao Wu, 2019. "Public Transportation Environment and Medical Choice for Chronic Disease: A Case Study of Gaoyou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Chih-Ching Yang, 2017. "Measuring health indicators and allocating health resources: a DEA-based approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 365-378, September.
    3. Sérgio Santos & Carla Amado & Mauro Santos, 2012. "Assessing the efficiency of mother-to-child HIV prevention in low- and middle-income countries using data envelopment analysis," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 206-222, September.
    4. Santini, Alberto, 2021. "Optimising the assignment of swabs and reagent for PCR testing during a viral epidemic," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Margaret Brandeau & Gregory Zaric, 2009. "Optimal investment in HIV prevention programs: more is not always better," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 27-37, March.
    6. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    7. Niyirora, Jerome & Zhuang, Jun, 2017. "Fluid approximations and control of queues in emergency departments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1110-1124.
    8. Ruoyan Sun & David Mendez, 2019. "Finding the optimal mix of smoking initiation and cessation interventions to reduce smoking prevalence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Emmett J. Lodree & Nezih Altay & Robert A. Cook, 2019. "Staff assignment policies for a mass casualty event queuing network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 411-442, December.
    10. Shangkun Deng & Yingke Zhu & Xiaoru Huang & Shuangyang Duan & Zhe Fu, 2022. "High-Frequency Direction Forecasting of the Futures Market Using a Machine-Learning-Based Method," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Sengul Orgut, Irem & Freeman, Nickolas & Lewis, Dwight & Parton, Jason, 2023. "Equitable and effective vaccine access considering vaccine hesitancy and capacity constraints," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    12. Xiang Chu & QiuYan Zhong, 2015. "Post-earthquake allocation approach of medical rescue teams," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1809-1824, December.
    13. Ahmed, Mohamed A. & Alkhamis, Talal M., 2009. "Simulation optimization for an emergency department healthcare unit in Kuwait," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 936-942, November.
    14. Miguel Angel Ortíz-Barrios & Dayana Milena Coba-Blanco & Juan-José Alfaro-Saíz & Daniela Stand-González, 2021. "Process Improvement Approaches for Increasing the Response of Emergency Departments against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-31, August.
    15. Katherine A. Daniell & Alec Morton & David Ríos Insua, 2016. "Policy analysis and policy analytics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(1), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Azrah A. Anparasan & Miguel A. Lejeune, 2018. "Data laboratory for supply chain response models during epidemic outbreaks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 53-64, November.
    17. Rahul Deb & Mallesh Pai & Akhil Vohra & Rakesh Vohra, 2022. "Testing alone is insufficient," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(1), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Steven Yin & Shatian Wang & Lingyi Zhang & Christian Kroer, 2020. "Dominant Resource Fairness with Meta-Types," Papers 2007.11961, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    19. Nadia Demarteau & Thomas Breuer & Baudouin Standaert, 2012. "Selecting a Mix of Prevention Strategies against Cervical Cancer for Maximum Efficiency with an Optimization Program," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 337-353, April.
    20. Howell, Bronwyn E. & Potgieter, Petrus H., 2022. "Smartphone-Based COVID-19 contact tracing apps – antipodean insights," 31st European Regional ITS Conference, Gothenburg 2022: Reining in Digital Platforms? Challenging monopolies, promoting competition and developing regulatory regimes 265635, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:67:y:2020:i:5:p:303-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.