IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v55y2008i3p277-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical note: Reexamination of all‐or‐none inspection policies in a supply chain with endogenous product quality

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Wan
  • Xiaowei Xu

Abstract

This note studies the optimal inspection policies in a supply chain in which a manufacturer purchases components from a supplier but has no direct control of component quality. The manufacturer uses an inspection policy and a damage cost sharing contract to encourage the supplier to improve the component quality. We find that all‐or‐none inspection policies are optimal for the manufacturer if the supplier's share of the damage cost is larger than a threshold; otherwise, the manufacturer should inspect a fraction of a batch. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Wan & Xiaowei Xu, 2008. "Technical note: Reexamination of all‐or‐none inspection policies in a supply chain with endogenous product quality," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 277-282, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:55:y:2008:i:3:p:277-282
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20273
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20273?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diane J. Reyniers & Charles S. Tapiero, 1995. "The Delivery and Control of Quality in Supplier-Producer Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(10), pages 1581-1589, October.
    2. W. Edwards Deming, 2000. "Out of the Crisis," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262541157, December.
    3. Kashi R. Balachandran & Suresh Radhakrishnan, 2005. "Quality Implications of Warranties in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1266-1277, August.
    4. Stanley Baiman & Paul E. Fischer & Madhav V. Rajan, 2000. "Information, Contracting, and Quality Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 776-789, June.
    5. Wei Shi Lim, 2001. "Producer-Supplier Contracts with Incomplete Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(5), pages 709-715, May.
    6. Iny Hwang & Suresh Radhakrishnan & Lixin (Nancy) Su, 2006. "Vendor Certification and Appraisal: Implications for Supplier Quality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(10), pages 1472-1482, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aadhaar Chaturvedi, 2021. "Excessive Competition and Supplier Non‐Performance Risk: Trade‐offs in Reverse Auctions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3073-3093, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murat Erkoc & Haresh Gurnani & Saibal Ray & Mingzhu Jin, 2023. "Quality investment, inspection policy, and pricing decisions in a decentralized supply chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 207-226, January.
    2. Hong Wan & Xiaowei Xu & Tian Ni, 2013. "The incentive effect of acceptance sampling plans in a supply chain with endogenous product quality," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(2), pages 111-124, March.
    3. Dionisia Tzavara and Adrienne Héritier, 2011. "Quality and Environmental Regulation: Verifying Compliance along the Supply Chain," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 16, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    4. Ying‐Ju Chen & Mingcherng Deng, 2013. "Supplier certification and quality investment in supply chains," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(3), pages 175-189, April.
    5. Aust, Gerhard & Bräuer, Ina & Buscher, Udo, 2014. "A note on “Quality investment and inspection policy in a supplier-manufacturer supply chain”," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 910-915.
    6. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Liu, Yu-Te, 2010. "Quality investment and inspection policy in a supplier-manufacturer supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 717-729, May.
    7. Dionisia Tzavara & Adrienne Héritier, 2011. "Quality and Environmental Regulation: Verifying Compliance along the Supply Chain," RSCAS Working Papers 2011/16, European University Institute.
    8. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee, 2017. "Sourcing Under Supplier Responsibility Risk: The Effects of Certification, Audit, and Contingency Payment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2795-2812, September.
    9. DeYong, Gregory D. & Pun, Hubert, 2015. "Is dishonesty the best policy? Supplier behaviour in a multi-tier supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 1-13.
    10. Tzavara Dionisia & Heritier Adrienne, 2012. "Quality and Environmental Regulation: Verifying Compliance along the Supply Chain," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Yoo, Seung Ho & Cheong, Taesu, 2018. "Quality improvement incentive strategies in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 331-342.
    12. Aadhaar Chaturvedi, 2021. "Excessive Competition and Supplier Non‐Performance Risk: Trade‐offs in Reverse Auctions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3073-3093, September.
    13. Agrawal, Anupam, 2014. "Managing raw material in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 685-698.
    14. Gary H. Chao & Seyed M. R. Iravani & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Quality Improvement Incentives and Product Recall Cost Sharing Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(7), pages 1122-1138, July.
    15. Yang Dong & Kefeng Xu & Yi Xu & Xiang Wan, 2013. "Quality Assurance Contracts in a Multi-Level Supply Chain," Working Papers 0206mss, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    16. Jing Chen & Hang Wei & Lei Xie, 2022. "Mitigating Product Quality Risk under External Financial Pressure: Inspection, Insurance, and Cash/Collateralized Loan," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 304-317, January.
    17. Chakraborty, Tulika & Chauhan, Satyaveer S. & Ouhimmou, Mustapha, 2019. "Cost-sharing mechanism for product quality improvement in a supply chain under competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 566-587.
    18. Li, Dong & Nagurney, Anna, 2015. "A general multitiered supply chain network model of quality competition with suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 336-356.
    19. Yan Dong & Kefeng Xu & Yi Xu & Xiang Wan, 2016. "Quality Management in Multi-Level Supply Chains with Outsourced Manufacturing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(2), pages 290-305, February.
    20. Erica L. Plambeck & Terry A. Taylor, 2019. "Testing by Competitors in Enforcement of Product Standards," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1735-1751, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:55:y:2008:i:3:p:277-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.