IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v35y1988i4p481-492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inspection policies and processes for deteriorating systems subject to catastrophic failure

Author

Listed:
  • Süleyman Özekici
  • Talin Papazyan

Abstract

Deteriorating reliability systems that are subject to catastrophic failure are analyzed in order to propose and evaluate some deterministic and stochastic inspection models. The underlying deterioration process is assumed to be an increasing Markov renewal process where the true state of the system can not be determined by simple observations. Instead, some tests can be done in order to detect if the system has positive deterioration or not. The results of the tests, however, are not perfect so that the probability of true and false detections depend on the unobserved state of the system. The system is inspected either deterministically at prespecified points in time, or stochastically at random points in time. Both types of models are considered to present explicit computational expressions for various performance measures like the expected number of inspections with different results and the probability of detection. Some practical applications of the results are also included.

Suggested Citation

  • Süleyman Özekici & Talin Papazyan, 1988. "Inspection policies and processes for deteriorating systems subject to catastrophic failure," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 481-492, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:35:y:1988:i:4:p:481-492
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(198808)35:43.0.CO;2-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(198808)35:43.0.CO;2-8
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(198808)35:43.0.CO;2-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Shwartz, 1978. "A Mathematical Model Used to Analyze Breast Cancer Screening Strategies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 937-955, December.
    2. Erhan Çinlar, 1975. "Exceptional Paper--Markov Renewal Theory: A Survey," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(7), pages 727-752, March.
    3. R. L. A. Kirch & M. Klein, 1974. "Surveillance Schedules for Medical Examinations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(10), pages 1403-1409, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisa M. Maillart & Julie Simmons Ivy & Scott Ransom & Kathleen Diehl, 2008. "Assessing Dynamic Breast Cancer Screening Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1411-1427, December.
    2. Alireza Sabouri & Woonghee Tim Huh & Steven M. Shechter, 2017. "Screening Strategies for Patients on the Kidney Transplant Waiting List," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1131-1146, October.
    3. Jonathan E. Helm & Mariel S. Lavieri & Mark P. Van Oyen & Joshua D. Stein & David C. Musch, 2015. "Dynamic Forecasting and Control Algorithms of Glaucoma Progression for Clinician Decision Support," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 979-999, October.
    4. Michael Shwartz, 1992. "Validation of a Model of Breast Cancer Screening," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 12(3), pages 222-228, August.
    5. B. C. Giri & T Chakraborty, 2007. "Optimal production, maintenance, and warranty strategies for item sold with rebate combination warranty," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 221(4), pages 257-264, December.
    6. Aleka Papadopoulou & George Tsaklidis, 2007. "Some Reward Paths in Semi-Markov Models with Stochastic Selection of the Transition Probabilities," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 399-411, September.
    7. Huynh, K.T., 2021. "An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    8. Hessam Bavafa & Sergei Savin & Christian Terwiesch, 2021. "Customizing Primary Care Delivery Using E‐Visits," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4306-4327, November.
    9. Hau L. Lee & Kamran Moinzadeh, 1987. "Operating characteristics of a two‐echelon inventory system for repairable and consumable items under batch ordering and shipment policy," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 365-380, June.
    10. Sharareh Taghipour & Laurent N. Caudrelier & Anthony B. Miller & Bart Harvey, 2017. "Using Simulation to Model and Validate Invasive Breast Cancer Progression in Women in the Study and Control Groups of the Canadian National Breast Screening Studies I and II," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 37(2), pages 212-223, February.
    11. Shelby Brumelle & Darius Walczak, 2003. "Dynamic Airline Revenue Management with Multiple Semi-Markov Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 137-148, February.
    12. Laura McLay & Christodoulos Foufoulides & Jason Merrick, 2010. "Using simulation-optimization to construct screening strategies for cervical cancer," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 294-318, December.
    13. Riccardo De Blasis, 2023. "Weighted-indexed semi-Markov model: calibration and application to financial modeling," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Wang, Fan & Zhang, Shengfan & Henderson, Louise M., 2018. "Adaptive decision-making of breast cancer mammography screening: A heuristic-based regression model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 70-84.
    15. Manuel D. Rossetti & Gordon M. Clark, 1999. "Moment Solutions for the State Exiting Counting Processes of a Markov Renewal Process," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 247-275, October.
    16. Zhou, Yifan & Zhang, Zhisheng & Lin, Tian Ran & Ma, Lin, 2013. "Maintenance optimisation of a multi-state series–parallel system considering economic dependence and state-dependent inspection intervals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 248-259.
    17. Marion S. Rauner & Walter J. Gutjahr & Kurt Heidenberger & Joachim Wagner & Joseph Pasia, 2010. "Dynamic Policy Modeling for Chronic Diseases: Metaheuristic-Based Identification of Pareto-Optimal Screening Strategies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1269-1286, October.
    18. James F. O’Mahony & Joost van Rosmalen & Nino A. Mushkudiani & Frans-Willem Goudsmit & Marinus J. C. Eijkemans & Eveline A. M. Heijnsdijk & Ewout W. Steyerberg & J. Dik F. Habbema, 2015. "The Influence of Disease Risk on the Optimal Time Interval between Screens for the Early Detection of Cancer," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(2), pages 183-195, February.
    19. Evrim Güneş & Stephen Chick & Luk Wassenhove, 2010. "Quality competition for screening and treatment services," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 201-222, July.
    20. Mark, Brian L. & Ephraim, Yariv, 2013. "An EM algorithm for continuous-time bivariate Markov chains," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 504-517.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:35:y:1988:i:4:p:481-492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.