IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i21-22p4007-4019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User involvement in the implementation of welfare technology in home care services: The experience of health professionals—A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Heidi Snoen Glomsås
  • Ingrid Ruud Knutsen
  • Mariann Fossum
  • Kristin Halvorsen

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim of this study is to learn more about factors that promote or inhibit user involvement among health professionals when implementing welfare technology in home care services. Background It is a health policy goal to increase the use of welfare technology in order to address some of the challenges that healthcare services are facing. Health professionals' involvement is important for the successful implementation of welfare technology in home care services. Design The study has an explorative and descriptive longitudinal design based on a qualitative approach. Five focus group interviews were conducted with 16 nurses and assistant nurses from three different municipalities over a period of 2 years. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The COREQ checklist was used. Results The analysis led to five main themes: competence a critical component, information and information lines, new ways of working, choice of welfare technology and change in patient services. From health professionals' perspective, there appeared to be a lack of preparedness for the change in the implementation of welfare technology entailed for home care services. The respondents experienced limited facilitation and opportunities for user involvement. Conclusion Health professionals want to be more involved but emphasised that competence, information and collaborative arenas are necessary factors if involvement in the process is to be increased. Competence affected some of the respondents' attitudes and willingness to use the technology. The respondents also experienced that the managements' focus on facilitation and interest in user involvement in addition to infrastructures that functioned in various ways had an impact on user involvement. Relevance to clinical practice The knowledge gained from this study about factors that promote or inhibit user involvement among health professionals could contribute to better preparedness for further implementation of welfare technology in the field of home care.

Suggested Citation

  • Heidi Snoen Glomsås & Ingrid Ruud Knutsen & Mariann Fossum & Kristin Halvorsen, 2020. "User involvement in the implementation of welfare technology in home care services: The experience of health professionals—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4007-4019, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4007-4019
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15424
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N/A, 2011. "Medical Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(3), pages 376-377, May.
    2. Greenhalgh, Trisha & Wherton, Joe & Sugarhood, Paul & Hinder, Sue & Procter, Rob & Stones, Rob, 2013. "What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 86-94.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:jss:jstsof:38:i08 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Tina Lien Barken & Elin Thygesen & Ulrika Söderhamn, 2018. "Unlocking the limitations: Living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and receiving care through telemedicine—A phenomenological study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 132-142, January.
    3. Anderson Díaz-Pérez & Tahania Chona Rodríguez & Zoraima Romero Oñate & Arley Vega Ochoa & Carmenza Mendoza Cataño & Roiman Arenas Potes, 2019. "Perception of the Moral Development of the Child With Autoimmune Disease by Clinicians and Researchers," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-80, February.
    4. Cecilie Karlsen & Carl Erik Moe & Kristin Haraldstad & Elin Thygesen, 2019. "Caring by telecare? A hermeneutic study of experiences among older adults and their family caregivers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1300-1313, April.
    5. Barlow, J & Knapp, M & Comas-Herrera, A & Damant, J & Freddolino, P & Hamblin, K & Hu, B & Lorenz, K & Perkins, M & Rehill, A & Wittenberg, R & Woolham, J, 2015. "The case for investment in technology to manage the global costs of dementia," Working Papers 72399, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.
    6. Sheabo Dessalegn, S., 2017. "Social capital and maternal health care use in rural Ethiopia," Other publications TiSEM bb0ec225-4ec3-4028-90d6-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Nicole Blay & Michael A Roche & Christine Duffield & Robyn Gallagher, 2017. "Intrahospital transfers and the impact on nursing workload," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4822-4829, December.
    8. Nysveen, Herbjørn & Pedersen, Per E. & Skard, Siv, 2020. "Ecosystem adoption of practices over time (EAPT): Toward an alternative view of contemporary technology adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 542-551.
    9. Lehoux, P. & Grimard, D., 2018. "When robots care: Public deliberations on how technology and humans may support independent living for older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 330-337.
    10. Alaa E. Alaa E. Badawi & Hamda M. Almansoori & Reem A. Alnuaimi & Fares M. Howari, 2021. "Factors Influencing Childhood and Adolescent Obesity in the Arab Gulf States: A Systematic Review," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(10), pages 1-98, October.
    11. Björn Fischer & Britt Östlund & Nicole K. Dalmer & Andrea Rosales & Alexander Peine & Eugène Loos & Louis Neven & Barbara Marshall, 2021. "Co-Design as Learning: The Differences of Learning When Involving Older People in Digitalization in Four Countries," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Toms, G. & Verity, F. & Orrell, A., 2019. "Social care technologies for older people: Evidence for instigating a broader and more inclusive dialogue," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    13. Linda Rykkje & Gunhild H. B. Hjorth, 2017. "“Safety at Home†: Experiences From Testing of Video Communication Between Patients and Home Health Care Personnel," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(4), pages 21582440177, December.
    14. Natalie C Ebner & Donovan M Ellis & Tian Lin & Harold A Rocha & Huizi Yang & Sandeep Dommaraju & Adam Soliman & Damon L Woodard & Gary R Turner & R Nathan Spreng & Daniela S Oliveira & Bob G Knight, 2020. "Uncovering Susceptibility Risk to Online Deception in Aging," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(3), pages 522-533.
    15. Benavides, Quetzabel & Doshi, Monika & Valentín-Cortés, Mislael & Militzer, Maria & Quiñones, Spring & Kraut, Ruth & Rion, Raymond & Bryce, Richard & Lopez, William D. & Fleming, Paul J., 2021. "Immigration law enforcement, social support, and health for Latino immigrant families in Southeastern Michigan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    16. Deborah Lupton, 2014. "Beyond Techno-Utopia: Critical Approaches to Digital Health Technologies," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-6, December.
    17. Janie Brown & Nicole Pope & Anna Maria Bosco & Jaci Mason & Alani Morgan, 2020. "Issues affecting nurses' capability to use digital technology at work: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 2801-2819, August.
    18. Jean Claude Mutiganda, 2016. "How do politicians shape and use budgets to govern public sector organizations? A position-practice approach," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 491-498, November.
    19. Tishelman, Carol & Lindqvist, Olav & Hajdarevic, Senada & Rasmussen, Birgit H. & Goliath, Ida, 2016. "Beyond the visual and verbal: Using participant-produced photographs in research on the surroundings for care at the end-of-life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 120-129.
    20. Obayashi, Kazuko & Kodate, Naonori & Masuyama, Shigeru, 2020. "Can connected technologies improve sleep quality and safety of older adults and care-givers? An evaluation study of sleep monitors and communicative robots at a residential care home in Japan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    21. Ittay Mannheim & Ella Schwartz & Wanyu Xi & Sandra C. Buttigieg & Mary McDonnell-Naughton & Eveline J. M. Wouters & Yvonne van Zaalen, 2019. "Inclusion of Older Adults in the Research and Design of Digital Technology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4007-4019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.