IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i11-12p2214-2224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surgical perioperative pathways—Patient experiences of unmet needs show that a person‐centred approach is needed

Author

Listed:
  • Kirsten Kaptain
  • Marie‐Louise Ulsøe
  • Pia Dreyer

Abstract

Aim To explore patients’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences of patients’ surgical pathways in a perioperative setting. Background Elective surgical pathways have improved over the past decades due to fast‐track programmes, but patients desire more personalised and coordinated care and treatment. There is little knowledge of how healthcare professionals’ collaboration and communication affect patients’ pathways. Design The overall framework was complex intervention method. A phenomenological‐hermeneutic approach was used for data analyses. COREQ checklist was used as a guideline to secure accurate and complete reporting of the study. Methods Field observations (120 hr) and semi‐structured interviews (24 patients) were undertaken during 2016–2017. Healthcare professionals involved in the pathways were interviewed: (a) 13 single interviews and (b) 13 focus group interviews (37 healthcare professionals) were conducted. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used. Results Patients asked for individualised information adapted to their life and illness experiences. Furthermore, healthcare professionals need access to a quick overview of individual patients and their perioperative pathway in the electronic patient journal (EPJ). Agreements made with patients did not always reach the right receiver, there was poor interpersonal communication and the complex teamwork between many healthcare professionals made pathways incoherent and uncoordinated. Healthcare professionals who had the time to talk about other subjects than the disease with smiles and good humour gave patients a feeling of security. Conclusion Patients wanted to be treated as individuals, but often they received standard treatment. Healthcare professionals had the intention of treating patients individually, but the EPJ and information provided to patients were not easy to access. Relevance to clinical practice Visible information about the patient's whole pathway could improve healthcare professionals’ care and treatment. In addition, systematic feedback from patients’ could make it possible to adjust information, care and treatment to achieve a more coherent pathway. Particular attention needs to be paid to how electronic healthcare systems can underpin relational coordination in pathways.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirsten Kaptain & Marie‐Louise Ulsøe & Pia Dreyer, 2019. "Surgical perioperative pathways—Patient experiences of unmet needs show that a person‐centred approach is needed," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2214-2224, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2214-2224
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14817
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tonje Sibbern & Vibeke Bull Sellevold & Simen A Steindal & Craig Dale & Judy Watt‐Watson & Alfhild Dihle, 2017. "Patients’ experiences of enhanced recovery after surgery: a systematic review of qualitative studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1172-1188, May.
    2. Agneta Aasa & Malin Hovbäck & Carina M Berterö, 2013. "The importance of preoperative information for patient participation in colorectal surgery care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(11-12), pages 1604-1612, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anette Viftrup & Pia Dreyer & Lone Nikolajsen & Anna Holm, 2021. "Surgery cancellation: A scoping review of patients' experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 357-371, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monica E Pettersson & Joakim Öhlén & Febe Friberg & Lars‐Christer Hydén & Catarina Wallengren & Elisabeth Kenne Sarenmalm & Eva Carlsson, 2018. "Prepared for surgery – Communication in nurses' preoperative consultations with patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer after a person‐centred intervention," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2904-2916, July.
    2. Katja Schubert Samuelsson & Monika Egenvall & Inga Klarin & Johan Lökk & Ulf Gunnarsson & Marie Iwarzon, 2018. "The older patient's experience of the healthcare chain and information when undergoing colorectal cancer surgery according to the enhanced recovery after surgery concept," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1580-1588, April.
    3. Bettina Højberg Kirk & Ole De Backer & Malene Missel, 2019. "Transforming the experience of aortic valve disease in older patients: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1233-1241, April.
    4. Giulia Villa & Emanuele Galli & Vittoria Azzimonti & Marianna Doneda & Noemi Giannetta & Duilio Fiorenzo Manara, 2022. "Empowerment-Based Education in Urological Patients: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(4), pages 666-689, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2214-2224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.