IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v31y2022i4p666-689.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowerment-Based Education in Urological Patients: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Giulia Villa
  • Emanuele Galli
  • Vittoria Azzimonti
  • Marianna Doneda
  • Noemi Giannetta
  • Duilio Fiorenzo Manara

Abstract

Prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer are the three most frequently diagnosed urological cancers. Educational programs could teach patients to become experts in disease management. The aim of this scoping review was to explore the literature to identify the educational requirements and strategies for improving and implementing educational processes for urological patients undergoing surgery. We searched several databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. All adult patients undergoing urological educational interventions were included in the review. Of 3,197 initially identified articles, 42 were retained. Urological patients undergoing prostatectomy, cystectomy, and nephrectomy require cognitive, psychological, and functional support. For each level of support, several methods exist to provide support, including informational brochures, preoperative counseling, telephone support, online content, educational videos, support groups, individual stress management interventions, peer support, online interventions, partner support, and various educational programs that help the patient manage negative effects associated with the urological intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulia Villa & Emanuele Galli & Vittoria Azzimonti & Marianna Doneda & Noemi Giannetta & Duilio Fiorenzo Manara, 2022. "Empowerment-Based Education in Urological Patients: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(4), pages 666-689, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:666-689
    DOI: 10.1177/10547738211030389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547738211030389
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547738211030389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agneta Aasa & Malin Hovbäck & Carina M Berterö, 2013. "The importance of preoperative information for patient participation in colorectal surgery care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(11-12), pages 1604-1612, June.
    2. Burkert, Silke & Scholz, Urte & Gralla, Oliver & Roigas, Jan & Knoll, Nina, 2011. "Dyadic planning of health-behavior change after prostatectomy: A randomized-controlled planning intervention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(5), pages 783-792, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monica E Pettersson & Joakim Öhlén & Febe Friberg & Lars‐Christer Hydén & Catarina Wallengren & Elisabeth Kenne Sarenmalm & Eva Carlsson, 2018. "Prepared for surgery – Communication in nurses' preoperative consultations with patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer after a person‐centred intervention," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2904-2916, July.
    2. Kirsten Kaptain & Marie‐Louise Ulsøe & Pia Dreyer, 2019. "Surgical perioperative pathways—Patient experiences of unmet needs show that a person‐centred approach is needed," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2214-2224, June.
    3. Szczuka, Zofia & Kulis, Ewa & Boberska, Monika & Banik, Anna & Kruk, Magdalena & Keller, Jan & Knoll, Nina & Scholz, Urte & Abraham, Charles & Luszczynska, Aleksandra, 2021. "Can individual, dyadic, or collaborative planning reduce sedentary behavior? A randomized controlled trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    4. Kulis, Ewa & Szczuka, Zofia & Banik, Anna & Siwa, Maria & Boberska, Monika & Knoll, Nina & Radtke, Theda & Scholz, Urte & Rhodes, Ryan E. & Luszczynska, Aleksandra, 2022. "Insights into effects of individual, dyadic, and collaborative planning interventions on automatic, conscious, and social process variables," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    5. Keller, Jan & Fleig, Lena & Hohl, Diana Hilda & Wiedemann, Amelie U. & Burkert, Silke & Luszczynska, Aleksandra & Knoll, Nina, 2017. "Which characteristics of planning matter? Individual and dyadic physical activity plans and their effects on plan enactment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 53-62.
    6. Katja Schubert Samuelsson & Monika Egenvall & Inga Klarin & Johan Lökk & Ulf Gunnarsson & Marie Iwarzon, 2018. "The older patient's experience of the healthcare chain and information when undergoing colorectal cancer surgery according to the enhanced recovery after surgery concept," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1580-1588, April.
    7. Berli, Corina & Stadler, Gertraud & Inauen, Jennifer & Scholz, Urte, 2016. "Action control in dyads: A randomized controlled trial to promote physical activity in everyday life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 89-97.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:666-689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.