IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i7-8pe1580-e1588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The older patient's experience of the healthcare chain and information when undergoing colorectal cancer surgery according to the enhanced recovery after surgery concept

Author

Listed:
  • Katja Schubert Samuelsson
  • Monika Egenvall
  • Inga Klarin
  • Johan Lökk
  • Ulf Gunnarsson
  • Marie Iwarzon

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe how older patients experience the healthcare chain and information given before, during and after colorectal cancer surgery. Background Most persons with colorectal cancer are older than 70 years and undergo surgery with subsequent enhanced recovery programmes aiming to quickly restore preoperative function. However, adaptation of such programmes to suit the older patient has not been made. Design Qualitative descriptive study. Method Semi‐structured interviews were conducted on 16 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery at a Swedish University Hospital. The inductive content analysis was employed. Results During the period of primary investigation and diagnosis, a paucity of information regarding the disease and management, and lack of help in coping with the diagnosis of cancer and its impact on future life, leads to a feeling of vulnerability. During their stay in hospital, the patient's negative perception of the hospital environment, their need for support, and uncertainty and anxiety about the future are evident. After discharge, rehabilitation is perceived as lacking in structure and individual adaptation, leading to disappointment. Persistent difficulty with nutrition delays recovery, and confusion regarding division of responsibility between primary and specialist care leads to increased anxiety and feelings of vulnerability. Information on self‐care is perceived as inadequate. Furthermore, provided information is not always understood and therefore not useful. Conclusion Information before and after surgery must be tailored to meet the needs of older persons, considering the patient's knowledge and ability to understand. Furthermore, individual nutritional requirements and preoperative physical activity and status must be taken into account when planning rehabilitation. Relevance to clinical practice Patient information must be personalised and made understandable. This can improve self‐preparation and participation in the own recovery. Special needs must be addressed early and followed up.

Suggested Citation

  • Katja Schubert Samuelsson & Monika Egenvall & Inga Klarin & Johan Lökk & Ulf Gunnarsson & Marie Iwarzon, 2018. "The older patient's experience of the healthcare chain and information when undergoing colorectal cancer surgery according to the enhanced recovery after surgery concept," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1580-1588, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1580-e1588
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14328
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zenobia Chan & Carmen Kan & Patrick Lee & Isabel Chan & Joyce Lam, 2012. "A systematic review of qualitative studies: patients’ experiences of preoperative communication," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5‐6), pages 812-824, March.
    2. Agneta Aasa & Malin Hovbäck & Carina M Berterö, 2013. "The importance of preoperative information for patient participation in colorectal surgery care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(11-12), pages 1604-1612, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ji Yea Lee & Yeonsoo Jang & Sanghee Kim & Woo Jin Hyung, 2020. "Uncertainty and unmet care needs before and after surgery in patients with gastric cancer: A survey study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 427-435, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monica E Pettersson & Joakim Öhlén & Febe Friberg & Lars‐Christer Hydén & Catarina Wallengren & Elisabeth Kenne Sarenmalm & Eva Carlsson, 2018. "Prepared for surgery – Communication in nurses' preoperative consultations with patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer after a person‐centred intervention," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2904-2916, July.
    2. Kirsten Kaptain & Marie‐Louise Ulsøe & Pia Dreyer, 2019. "Surgical perioperative pathways—Patient experiences of unmet needs show that a person‐centred approach is needed," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2214-2224, June.
    3. Mei‐Ling Lin & Chuen‐Teng Huang & Ching‐Huey Chen, 2017. "Reasons for family involvement in elective surgical decision‐making in Taiwan: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1969-1977, July.
    4. Natalie Williams & Georgia Griffin & Victoria Farrell & Yvonne L. Hauck, 2020. "Gaining insight into the supportive care needs of women experiencing gynaecological cancer: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1684-1694, May.
    5. Giulia Villa & Emanuele Galli & Vittoria Azzimonti & Marianna Doneda & Noemi Giannetta & Duilio Fiorenzo Manara, 2022. "Empowerment-Based Education in Urological Patients: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(4), pages 666-689, May.
    6. Tonje Sibbern & Vibeke Bull Sellevold & Simen A Steindal & Craig Dale & Judy Watt‐Watson & Alfhild Dihle, 2017. "Patients’ experiences of enhanced recovery after surgery: a systematic review of qualitative studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1172-1188, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1580-e1588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.