IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i3-4p357-371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surgery cancellation: A scoping review of patients' experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Anette Viftrup
  • Pia Dreyer
  • Lone Nikolajsen
  • Anna Holm

Abstract

Aims and objectives To review the literature on patients’ experiences of surgery cancellation to gain knowledge of nursing care needs and identify gaps in evidence. Background Surgery cancellations are an ongoing challenge in healthcare systems with negative impacts on healthcare costs, hospital staff and patients. Most research addresses the reasons for cancellation and implementation of preventive interventions, but limited knowledge exists about patients’ experiences of cancellation. Design The scoping review was undertaken using the methodology recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute for Scoping Reviews and the Reporting Cheklist for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR). Methods A systematic search was conducted by two independent researchers in Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed and PsycINFO. A forward and backward citation search was performed in Scopus, and references in relevant studies were explored. The tool Covidence was applied to select, compare and discuss relevant articles. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for critical appraisal. Results Surgery cancellation is emotionally harmful with negative effects on patients. Four themes were identified: ‘Initial reactions to cancellation’, ‘Reactions during a new waiting period at home and during readmission to hospital’, ‘Information about cancellation’ and ‘The experience of new practical arrangements’. Patients whose surgery was cancelled experienced initial feelings such as anger, rejection and anxiety and physical/psychosomatic symptoms in the extended waiting period. Patients prefered early sufficient information about cancellation from the surgeon. The practical arrangements were stressfull for the patients. Conclusion Nursing care and identification of vulnerable patients are essential to prevent negative effects in the extended waiting period. Provision of timely, sufficient and professional information about cancellation from the surgeon is important. Further research assessing consequences of cancellation is needed. Relevance to clinical practice Patients would benefit if hospitals find systems to minimise cancellation, and healthcare professionals could systematically develop professional supportive interventions tailored to patients’ individual needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Anette Viftrup & Pia Dreyer & Lone Nikolajsen & Anna Holm, 2021. "Surgery cancellation: A scoping review of patients' experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 357-371, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:357-371
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15582
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirsten Kaptain & Marie‐Louise Ulsøe & Pia Dreyer, 2019. "Surgical perioperative pathways—Patient experiences of unmet needs show that a person‐centred approach is needed," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2214-2224, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:357-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.