IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i1-2p160-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interprofessional collaboration at transition of care: perspectives of child and family health nurses and midwives

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Psaila
  • Virginia Schmied
  • Cathrine Fowler
  • Sue Kruske

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine collaboration in the provision of universal health services for children and families in Australia from the perspective of midwives and child health and family health nurses. Background Collaboration is identified as a key concept contributing to families' smooth transition between maternity and child health services. However, evidence suggests that collaboration between services is often lacking. Few studies have explored how maternity and child health and family health services or professionals collaborate to facilitate a smooth transition. Design This study reports on data collected in phases 1 and 2 of a three‐phase mixed‐methods study investigating the feasibility of implementing a national approach to child health and family health services in Australia (Child Health: Researching Universal Services study). Methods In phase 1, consultations (via discussion groups, focus groups and teleconferences) were held with 45 midwives and 60 child health and family health nurses. Themes identified were used to develop phase 2 surveys. In phase 2, 1098 child health and family health nurses and 655 midwives returned surveys. Results Midwives and child health and family health nurses reported ‘some collaboration’. Midwives and child health and family health nurses indicated that collaboration was supported by having agreement on common goals and recognising and valuing the contributions of others. Organisational barriers such as poor communication and information transfer processes obstructed relationships. Good collaboration was reported more frequently when working with other professionals (such as allied health professionals) to support families with complex needs. Conclusion This study provides information on the nature and extent of collaboration from the perspective of midwives and child health and family health nurses providing universal health services for children and families. Relevance to clinical practice Both professional groups emphasised the impact of service disconnection on families. However, their ability to negotiate professional differences is affected by system constraints and differing perspectives of what constitutes collaboration. Developing the capacity to collaborate is essential to ensure smooth transition of care given ongoing changes to the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Psaila & Virginia Schmied & Cathrine Fowler & Sue Kruske, 2015. "Interprofessional collaboration at transition of care: perspectives of child and family health nurses and midwives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 160-172, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:1-2:p:160-172
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12635
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Virginia Schmied & Annie Mills & Sue Kruske & Lynn Kemp & Cathrine Fowler & Caroline Homer, 2010. "The nature and impact of collaboration and integrated service delivery for pregnant women, children and families," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3516-3526, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silke Boertien & Arie Franx & Danielle E. M. C. Jansen & Henk Akkermans & Marlou L. A. de Kroon, 2022. "Connecting Obstetric, Maternity, Pediatric and Preventive Child Health Care: A Comparative Prospective Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mie G. de Wolff & Julie Midtgaard & Marianne Johansen & Ane L. Rom & Susanne Rosthøj & Ann Tabor & Hanne K. Hegaard, 2021. "Effects of a Midwife-Coordinated Maternity Care Intervention (ChroPreg) vs. Standard Care in Pregnant Women with Chronic Medical Conditions: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Silke Boertien & Arie Franx & Danielle E. M. C. Jansen & Henk Akkermans & Marlou L. A. de Kroon, 2022. "Connecting Obstetric, Maternity, Pediatric and Preventive Child Health Care: A Comparative Prospective Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Quiroz-Saavedra, Rodrigo & Alfaro, Jaime & Rodríguez-Rivas, Matías E., 2023. "Perceptions of professionals about factors affecting the implementation of early childhood support systems: A case study evaluation from an ecological perspective," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Cathrine Fowler & Sharon Reid & Jeannie Minnis & Carolyn Day, 2014. "Experiences of mothers with substance dependence: Informing the development of parenting support," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(19-20), pages 2835-2843, October.
    5. Hannah Olley & Kim Psaila & Cathrine Fowler & Sue Kruske & Caroline Homer & Virginia Schmied, 2017. "‘Being the bridge and the beacon’: a qualitative study of the characteristics and functions of the liaison role in child and family health services in Australia," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 91-102, January.
    6. Elaine Bennett & Karen Berry & Theophilus I Emeto & Oliver K Burmeister & Jeanine Young & Linda Shields, 2017. "Attitudes to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender parents seeking health care for their children in two early parenting services in Australia," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(7-8), pages 1021-1030, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:1-2:p:160-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.