IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i15-16p2313-2322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Care for community‐dwelling frail older people: a practice nurse perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jill Bindels
  • Karen Cox
  • Guy Widdershoven
  • Onno CP van Schayck
  • Tineke A Abma

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate care programmes for community‐dwelling frail older people from a practice nurse perspective and gain a deeper understanding of their role within the programmes. Background In response to the increasing frail population, three regions in the Netherlands implemented care programmes, in which a proactive approach is used to identify frail older people in the community and provide them with the appropriate care and support. Design A constructivist grounded theory approach. Methods A formative process evaluation was performed, in which study participants were practice nurses (n = 23) focusing on the identification of and care for frail older people in primary care settings. Based on the principles of grounded theory, data were collected via semi‐structured interviews and focus groups and analysed. Results The practice nurses explain that ‘building a trusting relationship’ with the older person and ‘making connections’ between older people, family and other professionals are key elements of good care in the programmes. ‘Targeting the wrong audience’ and ‘providing good care’ reflect the doubts and feelings of insecurity the practice nurses have about the screening and selection procedures and their own role and expertise in the programme. Conclusion According to the experiences of practice nurses, a trusting relationship with the older people is necessary to provide good care. Practice nurses feel they should receive more support and education to conquer issues concerning social problems in frail older people. Moreover, practice nurses considered the screening and selection procedures to be unsuccessful in identifying frail older people who do need care. Relevance to clinical practice A trusting relationship should be given high priority in the care for community‐dwelling frail older people. To improve the care programmes, screening and selection procedures need adjustments. Practice nurses should receive more support in dealing with older people with psychosocial problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jill Bindels & Karen Cox & Guy Widdershoven & Onno CP van Schayck & Tineke A Abma, 2014. "Care for community‐dwelling frail older people: a practice nurse perspective," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(15-16), pages 2313-2322, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:15-16:p:2313-2322
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12513
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abma, Tineke A., 2005. "Responsive evaluation: Its meaning and special contribution to health promotion," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 279-289, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baur, Vivianne E. & Abma, Tineke A. & Widdershoven, Guy A.M., 2010. "Participation of marginalized groups in evaluation: Mission impossible?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 238-245, August.
    2. Jolley, Gwyneth, 2014. "Evaluating complex community-based health promotion: Addressing the challenges," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 71-81.
    3. Kouévi, T.A. & van Mierlo, B. & Leeuwis, C., 2013. "Learning about fishery management: Evaluation of a contextualized responsive evaluation approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Kouévi, A.T. & Van Mierlo, B. & Leeuwis, C. & Vodouhê, S.D., 2013. "The design of a contextualized responsive evaluation framework for fishery management in Benin," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 15-28.
    5. Bindels, J. & Cox, K. & Widdershoven, G. & van Schayck, C.P. & Abma, T.A., 2014. "Stimulating program implementation via a Community of Practice: A responsive evaluation of care programs for frail older people in the Netherlands," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 115-121.
    6. Gert Schout & Gideon De Jong, 2018. "The Weakening of Kin Ties: Exploring the Need for Life-World Led Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:15-16:p:2313-2322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.