IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jijmms/v2025y2025i1n3384629.html

Collective Aggregation Model Based on the Hybridization of the EVAMIX Method and the VMAVA+ Voting Method

Author

Listed:
  • Zoïnabo Savadogo
  • Hadarou Yiogo

Abstract

In today’s society, collective decision‐making is an essential part of the process. It involves making a choice, finding a consensus between several divergent or even conflicting opinions. Numerous group decision‐making methods have been developed, but some have shortcomings and controversial results. The EVAMIX method is a decision support method for use with a single decision‐maker. It has good properties and is already widely used to solve certain choice problems with a single decision‐maker. In this work, our aim is to contribute to collective decision‐making by proposing a collective choice model combining the EVAMIX method and the VMAVA + voting method, with good properties according to the literature. To do this, we developed the model from these two methods by hybridizing them, presented the desired properties that it verifies, and ended by studying its algorithmic complexity by first developing its algorithm. An application was then made on examples, and a comparison of the results obtained with those of some existing collective aggregation methods in the literature led to the conclusion that it provides satisfactory results.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoïnabo Savadogo & Hadarou Yiogo, 2025. "Collective Aggregation Model Based on the Hybridization of the EVAMIX Method and the VMAVA+ Voting Method," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2025(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jijmms:v:2025:y:2025:i:1:n:3384629
    DOI: 10.1155/ijmm/3384629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/ijmm/3384629
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/ijmm/3384629?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Tavana, Madjid, 2011. "An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 373-386, August.
    2. Ruffin-Benoît M. Ngoie & Selain K. Kasereka & Jean-Aimé B. Sakulu & Kyandoghere Kyamakya, 2024. "Mean-Median Compromise Method: A Novel Deepest Voting Function Balancing Range Voting and Majority Judgment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-31, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caetani, Alberto Pavlick & Ferreira, Luciano & Borenstein, Denis, 2016. "Development of an integrated decision-making method for an oil refinery restructuring in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 197-210.
    2. Ricardo, Alexandre & Figueira, José Rui & Tavares, Luís Valadares, 2024. "Integrating confidence and preservation of information in the preference elicitation process: A lexicographic order approach for inconsistent judgments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Rihab Khemiri & Khaoula Elbedoui-Maktouf & Bernard Grabot & Belhassen Zouari, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for managing performance and risk in integrated procurement-production planning," Post-Print hal-01758604, HAL.
    4. Roy, B. & Figueira, J.R. & Almeida-Dias, J., 2014. "Discriminating thresholds as a tool to cope with imperfect knowledge in multiple criteria decision aiding: Theoretical results and practical issues," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 9-20.
    5. Barros, Carlos Pestana & Wanke, Peter, 2015. "An analysis of African airlines efficiency with two-stage TOPSIS and neural networks," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 44, pages 90-102.
    6. Fernández, Eduardo & Figueira, José Rui & Navarro, Jorge, 2019. "An interval extension of the outranking approach and its application to multiple-criteria ordinal classification," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 189-198.
    7. Kadziński, Miłosz & Tervonen, Tommi & Rui Figueira, José, 2015. "Robust multi-criteria sorting with the outranking preference model and characteristic profiles," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 126-140.
    8. Jiménez, Antonio & Mateos, Alfonso & Sabio, Pilar, 2013. "Dominance intensity measure within fuzzy weight oriented MAUT: An application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 397-405.
    9. Fumin Deng & Yanjie Li & Huirong Lin & Jinrui Miao & Xuedong Liang, 2020. "A BWM-TOPSIS Hazardous Waste Inventory Safety Risk Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Tavares, L. Valadares, 2012. "An acyclic outranking model to support group decision making within organizations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 782-790.
    11. Krzysztof Zagrajek & Mariusz Kłos & Desire D. Rasolomampionona & Mirosław Lewandowski & Karol Pawlak & Łukasz Baran & Tomasz Barcz & Przemysław Kołaczyński & Wojciech Suchecki, 2023. "Investing in Distributed Generation Technologies at Polish University Campuses during the Energy Transition Era," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Maria Cerretta & Lidia Diappi, 2014. "Adaptive Evaluations in Complex Contexts: Introduction," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1 Suppl.), pages 5-22.
    13. Sun, Bingzhen & Ma, Weimin, 2015. "An approach to consensus measurement of linguistic preference relations in multi-attribute group decision making and application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 83-92.
    14. Desmond Eseoghene Ighravwe & Sunday Ayoola Oke, 2019. "An integrated approach of SWARA and fuzzy COPRAS for maintenance technicians’ selection factors ranking," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(6), pages 1615-1626, December.
    15. Zida Song & Quan Liu & Zhigen Hu, 2020. "Decision-Making Framework, Enhanced by Mutual Inspection for First-Stage Dam Construction Diversion Scheme Selection," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(2), pages 563-577, January.
    16. Mi, Xiaomei & Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang & Shen, Wenjing & Lev, Benjamin, 2019. "The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what's next?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 205-225.
    17. Sarah Ben Amor & Fateh Belaid & Ramzi Benkraiem & Boumediene Ramdani & Khaled Guesmi, 2023. "Multi-criteria classification, sorting, and clustering: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 771-793, June.
    18. Kreye, M.E. & Goh, Y.M. & Newnes, L.B. & Goodwin, P., 2012. "Approaches to displaying information to assist decisions under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 682-692.
    19. Morteza Yazdani & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2016. "New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 1097-1113, November.
    20. Avijit De & Sujit Das & Samarjit Kar, 2021. "Ranking of interval type 2 fuzzy numbers using correlation coefficient and Mellin transform," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(4), pages 1018-1048, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jijmms:v:2025:y:2025:i:1:n:3384629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/6396 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.