IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jijmms/v2025y2025i1n3031708.html

Performance Comparison of Various Imputation Methods for Missing Data Mechanisms (MAR, MCAR, and MNAR) in a Nonstationary Time Series

Author

Listed:
  • Chantha Wongoutong

Abstract

Handling missing data in a time series is necessary for forecasting as they can significantly impact representation and pose serious problems such as loss of efficiency and unreliable results. The key to resolving this problem is data imputation, i.e., replacing the missing values with synthetic ones. The aim of this study is to understand the various missingness regimes and apply data imputation methods accordingly. To this end, the performances of several widely used data imputation methods for a nonstationary univariate time series having both trend and seasonality were assessed. The performances of four imputation methods: mean value, last observation carried forward (LOCF), Kalman smoothing, and multivariate imputation by a chained equation (MICE) based on whether 10%, 20%, 30%, or 40% of the data were missing at random (MAR), missing completely at random (MCAR), or missing not at random (MNAR), were compared in terms of the root mean squared error (RMSE) and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values for each scenario tested. MICE performed the best in all of the test cases regardless of the whether the missing data were MAR, MCAR, or MNAR.

Suggested Citation

  • Chantha Wongoutong, 2025. "Performance Comparison of Various Imputation Methods for Missing Data Mechanisms (MAR, MCAR, and MNAR) in a Nonstationary Time Series," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2025(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jijmms:v:2025:y:2025:i:1:n:3031708
    DOI: 10.1155/ijmm/3031708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/ijmm/3031708
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/ijmm/3031708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Buuren, Stef & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Karin, 2011. "mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 45(i03).
    2. Maritza Mera-Gaona & Ursula Neumann & Rubiel Vargas-Canas & Diego M López, 2021. "Evaluating the impact of multivariate imputation by MICE in feature selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-28, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nisa Boukichou-Abdelkader & Miguel Ángel Montero-Alonso & Alberto Muñoz-García, 2022. "Different Routes or Methods of Application for Dimensionality Reduction in Multicenter Studies Databases," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Abhilash Bandam & Eedris Busari & Chloi Syranidou & Jochen Linssen & Detlef Stolten, 2022. "Classification of Building Types in Germany: A Data-Driven Modeling Approach," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Boonstra Philip S. & Little Roderick J.A. & West Brady T. & Andridge Rebecca R. & Alvarado-Leiton Fernanda, 2021. "A Simulation Study of Diagnostics for Selection Bias," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(3), pages 751-769, September.
    4. Rapp, Hannah & Fredrick, Stephanie & Nickerson, Amanda, 2025. "Cyber victimization reports between parents and children: an examination of agreement predictors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    5. Christopher J Greenwood & George J Youssef & Primrose Letcher & Jacqui A Macdonald & Lauryn J Hagg & Ann Sanson & Jenn Mcintosh & Delyse M Hutchinson & John W Toumbourou & Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &, 2020. "A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Norah Alyabs & Sy Han Chiou, 2022. "The Missing Indicator Approach for Accelerated Failure Time Model with Covariates Subject to Limits of Detection," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Simon Schmidbauer & Maria Becker & Sonja Haug, 2024. "Online Political Participation of Refugees in Germany: Analysis of a Survey in Bavaria," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.
    8. Eunsil Seok & Akhgar Ghassabian & Yuyan Wang & Mengling Liu, 2024. "Statistical Methods for Modeling Exposure Variables Subject to Limit of Detection," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 16(2), pages 435-458, July.
    9. Ida Kubiszewski & Kenneth Mulder & Diane Jarvis & Robert Costanza, 2022. "Toward better measurement of sustainable development and wellbeing: A small number of SDG indicators reliably predict life satisfaction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 139-148, February.
    10. Georges Steffgen & Philipp E. Sischka & Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa, 2020. "The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    11. Christopher Kath & Florian Ziel, 2018. "The value of forecasts: Quantifying the economic gains of accurate quarter-hourly electricity price forecasts," Papers 1811.08604, arXiv.org.
    12. J M van Niekerk & M C Vos & A Stein & L M A Braakman-Jansen & A F Voor in ‘t holt & J E W C van Gemert-Pijnen, 2020. "Risk factors for surgical site infections using a data-driven approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Stefkovics, Ádám & Krekó, Péter & Koltai, Júlia, 2024. "When reality knocks on the door. The effect of conspiracy beliefs on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and the moderating role of experience with the virus," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    14. Joost R. Ginkel, 2020. "Standardized Regression Coefficients and Newly Proposed Estimators for $${R}^{{2}}$$R2 in Multiply Imputed Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 185-205, March.
    15. Rydberg, Jason & DeZago, Luke, 2025. "Skepticism in science and punitive attitudes," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Gerko Vink & Laurence E. Frank & Jeroen Pannekoek & Stef Buuren, 2014. "Predictive mean matching imputation of semicontinuous variables," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(1), pages 61-90, February.
    17. Peter C. Austin, 2025. "Multiple imputation with competing risk outcomes," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 929-949, February.
    18. Tsai, Tsung-Han, 2016. "A Bayesian Approach to Dynamic Panel Models with Endogenous Rarely Changing Variables," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 595-620, September.
    19. Hung Tong & Cristina Tortora, 2022. "Model-based clustering and outlier detection with missing data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(1), pages 5-30, March.
    20. Siyu Han & Shixiang Yu & Mengya Shi & Makoto Harada & Jianhong Ge & Jiesheng Lin & Cornelia Prehn & Agnese Petrera & Ying Li & Flora Sam & Giuseppe Matullo & Jerzy Adamski & Karsten Suhre & Christian , 2025. "LEOPARD: missing view completion for multi-timepoint omics data via representation disentanglement and temporal knowledge transfer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jijmms:v:2025:y:2025:i:1:n:3031708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/6396 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.