IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v19y2010i10p1137-1138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IQWiG methods - a response to two critiques

Author

Listed:
  • J. Jaime Caro
  • Erik Nord

    (Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway)

  • Uwe Siebert

    (UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i.T., Austria)

  • Alistair Mcguire

    (London School of Economics, London, UK)

  • Maurice Mcgregor

    (McGill University, Montreal, Canada)

  • David Henry

    (University of Newcastle|ICES, Newcastle, Australia)

  • Gerard de Pouvourville

    (ESSEC Business School, Cergy, France)

  • Vincenzo Atella

    (University 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy)

  • Peter Kolominsky-Rabas

    (IQWiG, Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Jaime Caro & Erik Nord & Uwe Siebert & Alistair Mcguire & Maurice Mcgregor & David Henry & Gerard de Pouvourville & Vincenzo Atella & Peter Kolominsky-Rabas, 2010. "IQWiG methods - a response to two critiques," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(10), pages 1137-1138.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:19:y:2010:i:10:p:1137-1138
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.1658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/hec.1658
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nord, Erik & Richardson, Jeff & Street, Andrew & Kuhse, Helga & Singer, Peter, 1995. "Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: An Australian survey of health issues," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1429-1437, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Afschin Gandjour, 2012. "Presenting Germany’s drug pricing rule as a cost-per-QALY rule," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 103-107, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:19:y:2010:i:10:p:1137-1138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.