IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v9y2019i5p1064-1080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic‐related CO2 emissions analysis of Ordos Basin based on a refined STIRPAT model

Author

Listed:
  • Shuangxing Liu
  • Bo Peng
  • Qi Liu
  • Chao Fan

Abstract

Identifying the impact factors of CO2 emissions is the basis of economic‐related CO2 emission analysis. In this study, we used the Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology (STIRPAT) model to investigate the extent of influence of each impact factor on the CO2 emissions of Ordos Basin, a typical heavy industrial region and the largest coal production area of China. A new parameter, exhaust gas treatment costs ratio (R), was introduced into the STIRPAT model to examine the relationship between abatement investment and CO2 emissions. The impact factors that were positively associated with the CO2 emissions of Ordos Basin (and the corresponding coefficient values, from the largest to the smallest) were the population count (1.0449), property of secondary industry (0.8366), energy intensity (0.7672), GDP per capita (0.7598), property of tertiary industry (0.6978), and urbanization level (0.4641). The only negatively associated parameter was the exhaust gas treatment costs ratio, which had a coefficient value of −0.1339. In addition, the technological factors (i.e., energy intensity and exhaust gas treatment costs ratio) could be used as indicators of CO2 emission control. This study systematically investigated and discussed the impact factors of CO2 emissions in coal‐producing areas, to gain insight into the emissions’ characteristics and to lay a foundation for CO2 reduction in such regions. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuangxing Liu & Bo Peng & Qi Liu & Chao Fan, 2019. "Economic‐related CO2 emissions analysis of Ordos Basin based on a refined STIRPAT model," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 9(5), pages 1064-1080, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:9:y:2019:i:5:p:1064-1080
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1920
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.1920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abid Rashid Gill & Kuperan K. Viswanathan & Sallahuddin Hassan, 2017. "Is Environmental Kuznets Curve Still Relevant?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 156-165.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing, Jing & Yang, Yanlin & Tang, Zhonghua, 2021. "Assessing the influence of injection temperature on CO2 storage efficiency and capacity in the sloping formation with fault," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pasquale Pazienza & Caterina Lucia, 2020. "How does FDI in the “agricultural and fishing” sector affect methane emission? Evidence from the OECD countries," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 37(2), pages 441-462, July.
    2. Kurniawan, Robi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2018. "Coal consumption, urbanization, and trade openness linkage in Indonesia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 576-583.
    3. Ar'anzazu de Juan & Pilar Poncela & Vladimir Rodr'iguez-Caballero & Esther Ruiz, 2022. "Economic activity and climate change," Papers 2206.03187, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    4. Vasilii Erokhin & Tianming Gao & Anna Ivolga, 2020. "Structural Variations in the Composition of Land Funds at Regional Scales across Russia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-39, June.
    5. Ali Acaravci & Guray Akalin, 2017. "Environment economic Growth Nexus: A Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(5), pages 34-43.
    6. Mara Madaleno & Victor Moutinho, 2021. "Analysis of the New Kuznets Relationship: Considering Emissions of Carbon, Methanol, and Nitrous Oxide Greenhouse Gases—Evidence from EU Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Ratneswary Rasiah & Vinitha Guptan & Muzafar Shah Habibullah, 2018. "Evaluating the Impact of Financial and Economic Factors on Environmental Degradation: A Panel Estimation Study of Selected Asean Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 209-216.
    8. Eko Mahar Diputra & Jungho Baek, 2018. "Is Growth Good or Bad For the Environment in Indonesia?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(1), pages 1-4.
    9. José-María Montero & Gema Fernández-Avilés & Tiziana Laureti, 2021. "A Local Spatial STIRPAT Model for Outdoor NO x Concentrations in the Community of Madrid, Spain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-33, March.
    10. Zoubida Mahcane & Mayou Abdellah & Mohamed Zergoune & Miloud Lacheheb, 2019. "Land Degradation and Economic Development in Algeria," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 137-142.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:9:y:2019:i:5:p:1064-1080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.