IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v12y1995i1p25-39.html

Context†Dependence of Auditors' Interpretations of the SFAS No. 5 Probability Expressions

Author

Listed:
  • TAREK AMER
  • KARL HACKENBRACK
  • MARK NELSON

Abstract

. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 5 requires accrual of contingent losses which are deemed probable. This disclosure criterion is intended to be applied uniformly across a variety of contexts. We performed an experiment which examined whether audit managers' interpretations of the SFAS No. 5 probability expressions are influenced by one contextual feature, event base rate. Counter to the intention of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), interpretations of the expression probable were positively associated with event base rate. Résumé. Le SFAS no 5 exige l'imputation à l'exercice des pertes éventuelles qui sont jugées «probables». La règle ainsi établie veut que ce critère de présentation d'information soit appliqué uniformément dans des contextes très divers. Les auteurs procèdent à une expérience dans le cadre de laquelle ils examinent si la façon dont les responsables de mission interprètent la gamme de probabilités, au sens du SFAS no 5, est influencée par une caractéristique contextuelle, la fréquence relative de l'événement. Contrairement au résultat visé par le FASB, les interprétations du terme «probable» sont en relation positive avec la fréquence relative de l'événement.

Suggested Citation

  • Tarek Amer & Karl Hackenbrack & Mark Nelson, 1995. "Context†Dependence of Auditors' Interpretations of the SFAS No. 5 Probability Expressions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 25-39, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:12:y:1995:i:1:p:25-39
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00479.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00479.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00479.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Banks, Dw & Kinney, Wr, 1982. "Loss Contingency Reports And Stock-Prices - An Empirical-Study," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(1), pages 240-254.
    2. Frost, Ca, 1991. "Loss Contingency Reports And Stock-Prices - A Replication And Extension Of Banks And Kinney," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 157-169.
    3. Joyce, Ej & Biddle, Gc, 1981. "Are Auditors Judgments Sufficiently Regressive," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 323-349.
    4. Schultz, Jj & Reckers, Pmj, 1981. "The Impact Of Group Processing On Selected Audit Disclosure Decisions," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 482-501.
    5. Kenneth E. Harrison & Lawrence A. Tomassini, 1989. "Judging the probability of a contingent loss: An empirical study," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 642-648, March.
    6. Holt, Doris L., 1987. "Auditors and base rates revisited," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 571-578, October.
    7. Swieringa, R & Gibbins, M & Larsson, L & Sweeney, Jl, 1976. "Experiments In Heuristics Of Human Information-Processing," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14, pages 159-187.
    8. Kida, T, 1984. "The Impact Of Hypothesis-Testing Strategies On Auditors Use Of Judgment Data," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(1), pages 332-340.
    9. Lewis, Bl, 1980. "Expert Judgment In Auditing - An Expected Utility Approach," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(2), pages 594-602.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Solomon, Ira & Trotman, Ken T., 2003. "Experimental judgment and decision research in auditing: the first 25 years of AOS," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 395-412, May.
    2. K. Raghunandan, 1993. "Predictive Ability of Audit Qualifications for Loss Contingencies," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 612-634, March.
    3. Du, Ning & Stevens, Kevin T. & McEnroe, John E., 2011. "Improving consistency in interpreting SFAS 5 probability phrases," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 67-70.
    4. Joseph Aharony & Amihud Dotan, 2004. "A Comparative Analysis of Auditor, Manager and Financial Analyst Interpretations of SFAS 5 Disclosure Guidelines," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3‐4), pages 475-504, April.
    5. K. Raghunandan & Richard A. Grimlund & Albert Schepanski, 1991. "Auditor evaluation of loss contingencies," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 549-569, March.
    6. Stuart, Iris & Shin, Yong-Chul & Cram, Donald P. & Karan, Vijay, 2013. "Review of choice-based, matched, and other stratified sample studies in auditing research," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 88-113.
    7. T. S. Amer & Phil Drake, 2005. "Qualitative Expressions of Magnitude: The AuditorÕs Responsibility," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 20(1), pages 29-36.
    8. Marc Badia & Miguel Duro & Bjorn N. Jorgensen & Gaizka Ormazabal & Hans B. Christensen, 2020. "The Informational Effects of Tightening Oil and Gas Disclosure Rules," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1720-1755, September.
    9. Koku, Paul Sergius & Qureshi, Anique A. & Akhigbe, Aigbe, 2001. "The effects of news on initial corporate lawsuits," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 49-55, July.
    10. Stocks, Morris H. & Harrell, Adrian, 1995. "The impact of an increase in accounting information level on the judgment quality of individuals and groups," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(7-8), pages 685-700.
    11. Sadok Mansour, 2007. "Modelisation Du Risque Dans Les Methodologies D'Audit : Apport Des De La Psychometrie," Post-Print halshs-00543217, HAL.
    12. Petersen, Knut & Patzke, Henning, 1986. "Individuelles Informationsverhalten als Gegenstand des "Behavioral Accounting": Eine Meta-Analyse der empirischen Forschung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 177, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    13. Mario J. Maletta, 1993. "An Examination of Auditors' Decisions to Use Internal Auditors as Assistants: The Effect of Inherent Risk," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 508-525, March.
    14. Philip R. Beaulieu, 1994. "Utilisation par les prêteurs commerciaux de l'information comptable en interaction avec la crédibilité de la source," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 587-623, March.
    15. Philip R. Beaulieu, 1994. "Commercial Lenders' Use of Accounting Information in Interaction with Source Credibility," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 557-585, March.
    16. Marc J. Leclere, 1999. "The Interpretation of Coefficients in N†Chotomous Qualitative Response Models," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 711-747, December.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3528 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Ruhnke, Klaus, 2023. "Empirical research frameworks in a changing world: The case of audit data analytics," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    19. Jim Psaros, 2007. "Do principles‐based accounting standards lead to biased financial reporting? An Australian experiment," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 47(3), pages 527-550, September.
    20. Yingwen Deng & Ole‐Kristian Hope & Cyndia Wang & Min Zhang, 2022. "Capital market liberalization and auditors' accounting adjustments: Evidence from a quasi‐experiment," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1-2), pages 215-248, January.
    21. Asay, H. Scott & Libby, Robert & Rennekamp, Kristina, 2018. "Firm performance, reporting goals, and language choices in narrative disclosures," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 380-398.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:12:y:1995:i:1:p:25-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.