IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v7y2011i1p1-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual and Group Based Parenting for Improving Psychosocial Outcomes for Teenage Parents and Their Children

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Barlow
  • Nadja Smailagic
  • Cathy Bennett
  • Nick Huband
  • Hannah Jones
  • Esther Coren

Abstract

Adolescent parents face a range of problems. They are often from very deprived backgrounds; they can experience a range of mental health problems and a lack of social support; they often lack knowledge about child development and effective parenting skills, and they have developmental needs of their own. Possibly for these reasons, the children of teenage parents often have poor outcomes. A range of interventions are being used to promote the well‐being of teenage parents and their children. Parenting programmes have been found to be effective in improving psychosocial health in parents more generally (including reducing anxiety and depression, and improving self‐esteem), alongside a range of developmental outcomes for children. This review therefore investigated the impact of parenting programmes aimed specifically at teenage parents on outcomes for both them and their children. The findings are based on eight studies measuring a variety of outcomes, using a range of standardised measures. It was possible to combine results (meta‐analysis) for nine comparisons. Results from four of these meta‐analyses suggest that parenting programmes may be effective in improving parent responsiveness to the child, and parent child interaction, both post‐intervention and at follow‐up. Infant responsiveness to the mother also showed improvement at follow‐up. The results of the other five meta‐analyses we carried out were inconclusive. Further rigorous research is needed that provides both short‐ and long‐term follow‐up of the children of teenage parents, and that assesses the benefits of parenting programmes for young fathers as well as young mothers. Abstract Background Parenting programmes are a potentially important means of supporting teenage parents and improving outcomes for their children, and parenting support is a priority across most Western countries. This review updates the previous version published in 2001. Objectives To examine the effectiveness of parenting programmes in improving psychosocial outcomes for teenage parents and developmental outcomes in their children. Search strategy We searched to find new studies for this updated review in January 2008 and May 2010 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ASSIA, CINAHL, DARE, ERIC, PsyclNFO, Sociological Abstracts and Social Science Citation Index. The National Research Register (NRR) was last searched in May 2005 and UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio Database in May 2010. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials assessing short‐term parenting interventions aimed specifically at teenage parents and a control group (no‐treatment, waiting list or treatment‐as‐usual). Data collection and analysis We assessed the risk of bias in each study. We standardised the treatment effect for each outcome in each study by dividing the mean difference in post‐intervention scores between the intervention and control groups by the pooled standard deviation. Main results We included eight studies with 513 participants, providing a total of 47 comparisons of outcome between intervention and control conditions. Nineteen comparisons were statistically significant, all favouring the intervention group. We conducted nine meta‐analyses using data from four studies in total (each meta‐analysis included data from two studies). Four meta‐analyses showed statistically significant findings favouring the intervention group for the following outcomes: parent responsiveness to the child post‐intervention (SMD ‐0.91, 95% CI ‐1.52 to ‐0.30, P = 0.04); infant responsiveness to mother at follow‐up (SMD ‐0.65, 95% CI ‐1.25 to ‐0.06, P = 0.03); and an overall measure of parent‐child interactions post‐intervention (SMD ‐0.71, 95% CI ‐1.31 to ‐0.11, P = 0.02), and at follow‐up (SMD ‐0.90, 95% CI ‐1.51 to ‐0.30, P = 0.004). The results of the remaining five meta‐analyses were inconclusive. Authors' conclusions Variation in the measures used, the included populations and interventions, and the risk of bias within the included studies limit the conclusions that can be reached. The findings provide some evidence to suggest that parenting programmes may be effective in improving a number of aspects of parent‐child interaction both in the short‐ and long‐term, but further research is now needed. Plain language summary Parenting programmes for teenage parents and their children Adolescent parents face a range of problems. They are often from very deprived backgrounds; they can experience a range of mental health problems and a lack of social support; they often lack knowledge about child development and effective parenting skills, and they have developmental needs of their own. Possibly for these reasons, the children of teenage parents often have poor outcomes. A range of interventions are being used to promote the well‐being of teenage parents and their children. Parenting programmes have been found to be effective in improving psychosocial health in parents more generally (including reducing anxiety and depression, and improving self‐esteem), alongside a range of developmental outcomes for children. This review therefore investigated the impact of parenting programmes aimed specifically at teenage parents on outcomes for both them and their children. The findings are based on eight studies measuring a variety of outcomes, using a range of standardised measures. It was possible to combine results (meta‐analysis) for nine comparisons. Results from four of these meta‐analyses suggest that parenting programmes may be effective in improving parent responsiveness to the child, and parent‐child interaction, both post‐intervention and at follow‐up. Infant responsiveness to the mother also showed improvement at follow‐up. The results of the other five meta‐analyses we carried out were inconclusive. Further rigorous research is needed that provides both short‐ and long‐term follow‐up of the children of teenage parents, and that assesses the benefits of parenting programmes for young fathers as well as young mothers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Barlow & Nadja Smailagic & Cathy Bennett & Nick Huband & Hannah Jones & Esther Coren, 2011. "Individual and Group Based Parenting for Improving Psychosocial Outcomes for Teenage Parents and Their Children," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 1-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:7:y:2011:i:1:p:1-77
    DOI: 10.4073/csr.2011.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2011.2
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4073/csr.2011.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McDonell, James R. & Limber, Susan P. & Connor-Godbey, Jennifer, 2007. "Pathways Teen Mother Support Project: Longitudinal findings," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 840-855, July.
    2. J. Pevalin, David, 2003. "Outcomes in childhood and adulthood by mother’s age at birth: evidence from the 1970 British Cohort Study," ISER Working Paper Series 2003-31, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morris, Heather & O'Connor, Amanda & Cummins, Jonathon & Valentine, Cathie & Dwyer, Andrea & Goodyear, Melinda & Skouteris, Helen, 2019. "A pilot efficacy study of Parents Building Solutions: A universal parenting program using co-design and strength-based approaches," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Chiara Ionio & Eleonora Mascheroni & Gianluca Lista & Caterina Colombo & Giulia Ciuffo & Marta Landoni & Irene Daniele & Merideth Gattis, 2022. "Monochorionic Twins and the Early Mother-Infant Relationship: An Exploratory Observational Study of Mother-Infant Interaction in the Post-Partum Period," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiradate Thasayaphan, 2011. "School-based Management Framework and Education Efficiency," Applied Economics Journal, Kasetsart University, Faculty of Economics, Center for Applied Economic Research, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Jessica Harding & Jean Knab & Susan Zief & Kevin Kelly & Diana McCallum, "undated". "A Systematic Review of Programs to Promote Aspects of Teen Parents’ Self-Sufficiency: Supporting Educational Outcomes and Healthy Birth Spacing," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 05e656f1b4a54dae83654795b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Harsha Aturupane & Paul Glewwe & Suzanne Wisniewski, 2013. "The impact of school quality, socioeconomic factors, and child health on students’ academic performance: evidence from Sri Lankan primary schools," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 2-37, February.
    4. Devon Gorry, 2023. "Consequences of Teenage Childbearing on Child Outcomes in the United States," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 225-254, January.
    5. Shaw, Mary & Lawlor, Debbie A. & Najman, Jake M., 2006. "Teenage children of teenage mothers: Psychological, behavioural and health outcomes from an Australian prospective longitudinal study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2526-2539, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:7:y:2011:i:1:p:1-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.