IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v21y2025i1ne70024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence and Gap Map of Whole‐School Interventions Promoting Mental Health and Preventing Risk Behaviours in Adolescence: Programme Component Mapping Within the Health‐Promoting Schools Framework: An evidence and gap map

Author

Listed:
  • Roshini Balasooriya Lekamge
  • Ria Jain
  • Jenny Sheen
  • Pravik Solanki
  • Yida Zhou
  • Lorena Romero
  • Margaret M. Barry
  • Leo Chen
  • Md Nazmul Karim
  • Dragan Ilic

Abstract

Adolescence is a vulnerable period for the onset of mental disorders and risk behaviours. Whole‐school interventions hold vast potential in improving mental health and preventing risk behaviours in this developmentally‐sensitive cohort. Modelled on the World Health Organisation's Health‐Promoting Schools Framework, whole‐school interventions aspire for change across eight domains: (i) school curriculum, (ii) school social‐emotional environment, (iii) school physical environment, (iv) school governance and leadership, (v) school policies and resources, (vi) school and community partnerships, (vii) school health services and (viii) government policies and resources. Through embodying a systems‐based approach and involving the key stakeholders in an adolescent's life, including their peers, parents and teachers, whole‐school interventions are theoretically more likely than other forms of school‐based approaches to improve adolescent mental health and prevent risk behaviours. However, vague operationalisation of what is to be implemented, how and by whom presents challenges for stakeholders in identifying concrete actions for the eight domains and thus in realising the potential of the Framework. Mapping how whole‐school interventions operationalise the eight domains enables appraisal of current practice against the recommendations of the Health‐Promoting Schools Framework. This facilitates identification of critical evidence gaps in need of research, with the aim of fostering optimal translation of the Framework into practice to promote mental health and prevent risk behaviours in adolescence. Our EGM's objective was to map how randomised controlled trials of whole‐school interventions promoting mental health and preventing risk behaviours in adolescence addressed the eight domains of a whole‐school approach. Our EGM was conducted in accordance with a pre‐registered protocol (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023491619). Eight scientific databases were searched: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid PsycINFO, Ovid Emcare, CINAHL, ERIC, CENTRAL and Scopus. Expert‐recommended sources of the grey literature were also searched, including the Blueprints for Healthy Youth Development registry of evidence‐based positive youth development programmes and the SAMHSA Evidence‐Based Practice Resource Centre. To be included in our EGM, studies had to involve randomised controlled trials or cluster randomised controlled trials comprising students aged 12 to 18. Interventions had to demonstrate a whole‐school approach promoting mental health and/or preventing risk behaviours, including at least one program component addressing each of the curriculum‐, ethos and environment‐, and community‐levels of a whole‐school approach. Studies had to include an active or inactive comparator. Studies had to report on at least one of the mental health and/or risk behaviour outcomes detailed in the WHO‐UNICEF Helping Adolescents Thrive Initiative, which includes positive mental health, mental disorders, mental health literacy, substance use, bullying and aggression. Two independent reviewers screened search results, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer on the research team. Risk‐of‐bias assessments were completed by two independent reviewers for each included study using the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer on the research team. Data extraction for each included study was completed independently by two reviewers, in accordance with a prespecified template. Data extraction included study characteristics and intervention components, the latter of which was mapped against the eight domains of a whole‐school approach. 12, 897 records were identified from the searches. A total of 28 studies reported in 58 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The majority of interventions implemented by studies classified as either substance use prevention (10 of 28 studies) or multiple risk behaviour interventions (8 of 28 studies). The majority of studies involved students in lower secondary school grade levels, with only 5 of 28 studies targeting students in grades 10 to 12. The majority of studies were set in high‐income countries, with minimal representation of low‐ and middle‐income countries (5 of 28 studies). The interventions implemented by studies ranged from 9 weeks to 3 years in duration. Though 100% of studies involved students in the evaluation stage and 61% in the implementation of intervention strategies, only 39% involved students in the planning and 29% in the design of whole‐school interventions. Significant variability existed in how frequently whole‐school interventions addressed each of the eight domains, ranging from 7% to 100%. This included 100% of interventions implemented by studies addressing the school curriculum domain, 64% the school social‐emotional environment domain, 46% the school physical environment domain, 50% the school governance and leadership domain, 61% the school policies and resources domain, 93% the school and community partnerships domain, 29% the school health services domain and 7% the government policies and resources domain. Despite different intervention foci, there was a clear overlap in whole‐school intervention strategies within each domain. Our EGM identifies several critical foci for future research. These include the need to investigate (i) whether certain domains of a whole‐school approach are critical to intervention success; (ii) whether addressing more domains translates to greater impact; and (iii) the relative effectiveness of common intervention strategies within each domain to enable the most effective to be prioritised. Our EGM identifies the need for greater investment in older adolescent populations and those from low‐ and middle‐income countries. Finally, we encourage stakeholders including researchers, schools, public health and policy makers to consider four crucial factors in the design and planning of whole‐school interventions and to investigate their potential impact on intervention success. These include: (i) the provision of training and support mechanisms for those implementing interventions; (ii) the decision between single‐issue versus multiple‐issue prevention programs; (iii) the optimal intervention duration; and (iv) the involvement of adolescents in the design and planning of whole‐school interventions to ensure that interventions reflect their real‐world needs, preferences and interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Roshini Balasooriya Lekamge & Ria Jain & Jenny Sheen & Pravik Solanki & Yida Zhou & Lorena Romero & Margaret M. Barry & Leo Chen & Md Nazmul Karim & Dragan Ilic, 2025. "Evidence and Gap Map of Whole‐School Interventions Promoting Mental Health and Preventing Risk Behaviours in Adolescence: Programme Component Mapping Within the Health‐Promoting Schools Framework: An ," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:21:y:2025:i:1:n:e70024
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.70024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.70024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merzel, C. & D'Afflitti, J., 2003. "Reconsidering community-based health promotion: Promise, performance, and potential," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(4), pages 557-574.
    2. Susan H. Spence & Michael G. Sawyer & Jeanie Sheffield & George Patton & Lyndal Bond & Brian Graetz & Debra Kay, 2014. "Does the Absence of a Supportive Family Environment Influence the Outcome of a Universal Intervention for the Prevention of Depression?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Shannon Kugley & Anne Wade & James Thomas & Quenby Mahood & Anne‐Marie Klint Jørgensen & Karianne Hammerstrøm & Nila Sathe, 2017. "Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-73.
    4. Kuller, L.H. & Merzel, C.R., 2003. "On reconsidering community-based health promotion [3] (multiple letters)," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(8), pages 1201-1202.
    5. Torill Bogsnes Larsen & Helga Bjørnøy Urke & Sara Madeleine Kristensen & Frida Kathrine Sofie Mathisen, 2023. "Caring Climate and Support, Mental Health, and Academic Adjustment: Effects from a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Upper Secondary Schools in Norway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Perry, C.L. & Stigler, M.H. & Arora, M. & Reddy, K.S., 2009. "Preventing tobacco use among young people in India: Project MYTRI," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(5), pages 899-906.
    7. Camilla Thørring Bonnesen & Lau Caspar Thygesen & Naja Hulvej Rod & Mette Toftager & Katrine Rich Madsen & Marie Pil Jensen & Johanne Aviaja Rosing & Stine Kjær Wehner & Pernille Due & Rikke Fredenslu, 2023. "Preventing Stress among High School Students in Denmark through the Multicomponent Healthy High School Intervention—The Effectiveness at First Follow-Up," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Foshee, V.A. & Bauman, K.E. & Arriaga, X.B. & Helms, R.W. & Koch, G.G. & Linder, G.F., 1998. "An evaluation of safe dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(1), pages 45-50.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristie L. Ebi, 2011. "Resilience to the Health Risks of Extreme Weather Events in a Changing Climate in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Reid, Kaydian S. & Sekhobo, Jackson P. & Gantner, Leigh A. & Holbrook, MaryEllen K. & Allsopp, Marie & Whalen, Linda B. & Koren-Roth, Amy, 2018. "A mixed-method evaluation of the New York State Eat Well Play Hard Community Projects: Building local capacity for sustainable childhood obesity prevention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 79-88.
    3. Mariano Kanamori & Mario De La Rosa & Cho-Hee Shrader & Cesar Munayco & Susanne Doblecki-Lewis & Guillermo Prado & Steven Safren & Mary Jo Trepka & Kayo Fujimoto, 2019. "Progreso en Salud: Findings from Two Adapted Social Network HIV Risk Reduction Interventions for Latina Seasonal Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Andrew Osehi Enaifoghe & Cotties Toyin Adetiba, 2019. "Understanding Dynamic Engagement of Community in Local Governance, Enhancing Grassroots Development in South Africa," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 10(1), pages 22-32.
    5. Huan-Cheng Chang & Ting-Huan Chang & Hsiao-Yen Kang & Yu-Wei Chen & Sheng-Pyng Chen & Mei-Chin Wang & Jersey Liang, 2022. "Retention in Community Health Screening among Taiwanese Adults: A 9-Year Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Lara Stauvermann & Meike Rau & Vivian Meyer & Isabella Sasso & Michael Feldhaus & Karsten Speck, 2025. "PROTOCOL: School Absenteeism Among Children and Young People With Disabilities: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), March.
    7. Stanley, Nicky & Ellis, Jane & Farrelly, Nicola & Hollinghurst, Sandra & Downe, Soo, 2015. "Preventing domestic abuse for children and young people: A review of school-based interventions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 120-131.
    8. Sanjeev Sharma & Renu Popli & Sajjan Singh & Gunjan Chhabra & Gurpreet Singh Saini & Maninder Singh & Archana Sandhu & Ashutosh Sharma & Rajeev Kumar, 2024. "The Role of 6G Technologies in Advancing Smart City Applications: Opportunities and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-53, August.
    9. Howard White & Bianca Albers & Marie Gaarder & Hege Kornør & Julia Littell & Zack Marshall & Christine Mathew & Terri Pigott & Birte Snilstveit & Hugh Waddington & Vivian Welch, 2020. "Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    10. Colleen M. Fisher & Michael G. Lee & Mary E. Boudreau, 2014. "Using Mixed-Method Assessment to Advance Adolescent HIV Prevention," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 23(5), pages 490-513, October.
    11. Martin Polak & Norbert Tanzer & Per Carlbring, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Effects of virtual reality exposure therapy versus in vivo exposure in treating social anxiety disorder in adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    12. Chris O'Leary & Rob Ralphs & Jennifer Stevenson & Andrew Smith & Jordan Harrison & Zsolt Kiss & Harry Armitage, 2024. "The effectiveness of abstinence‐based and harm reduction‐based interventions in reducing problematic substance use in adults who are experiencing homelessness in high income countries: A systematic re," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    13. Heather MacDonald & Cozette Comer & Margaret Foster & Patrick R. Labelle & Scott Marsalis & Kate Nyhan & Zahra Premji & Morwenna Rogers & Ryan Splenda & Claire Stansfield & Sarah Young, 2024. "Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), September.
    14. Eduardo González‐Cabañes & Trinidad Garcia & Catherine Chase & Jose Carlos Núñez, 2023. "PROTOCOL: Problem solving before instruction (PS‐I) to promote learning and motivation in child and adult students," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    15. Ajay Kumar & Sushil Kumar & Komal & Nirala Ramchiary & Pardeep Singh, 2021. "Role of Traditional Ethnobotanical Knowledge and Indigenous Communities in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    16. Kylie Burke & Cassandra K. Dittman & Elana J. Forbes & Elizabeth Eggins, 2021. "PROTOCOL: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating the impact of parenting programmes for parents of adolescents (10–18 years) on adolescent mental health outco," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), March.
    17. Andrej Belak & Zuzana Dankulincova Veselska & Andrea Madarasova Geckova & Jitse P. van Dijk & Sijmen A. Reijneveld, 2017. "How Well Do Health-Mediation Programs Address the Determinants of the Poor Health Status of Roma? A Longitudinal Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Hugh Waddington & Ada Sonnenfeld & Juliette Finetti & Marie Gaarder & Denny John & Jennifer Stevenson, 2019. "Citizen engagement in public services in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A mixed‐methods systematic review of participation, inclusion, transparency and accountability (PITA) initiatives," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1-2), June.
    19. Julie Birkenmaier & Brandy Maynard & Hannah Shanks & Harly Blumhagen, 2023. "PROTOCOL: Medical‐financial partnerships for improving financial and health outcomes for lower‐income Americans: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    20. Smylie, Janet & Kirst, Maritt & McShane, Kelly & Firestone, Michelle & Wolfe, Sara & O'Campo, Patricia, 2016. "Understanding the role of Indigenous community participation in Indigenous prenatal and infant-toddler health promotion programs in Canada: A realist review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 128-143.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:21:y:2025:i:1:n:e70024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.