IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v16y2020i1ne1079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PROTOCOL: Adult/child ratio and group size in early childhood education or care to promote the development of children aged 0–5 years: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Nina T. Dalgaard
  • Anja Bondebjerg
  • Rasmus Klokker
  • Bjørn C. A. Viinholt
  • Jens Dietrichson

Abstract

This is the protocol for a Campbell review. The objectives are as follows: To synthesize data from studies to assess the impact of adult/child ratio and group size in ECEC on measures of process characteristics of quality of care and on child outcome measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina T. Dalgaard & Anja Bondebjerg & Rasmus Klokker & Bjørn C. A. Viinholt & Jens Dietrichson, 2020. "PROTOCOL: Adult/child ratio and group size in early childhood education or care to promote the development of children aged 0–5 years: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:16:y:2020:i:1:n:e1079
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1079
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward K. Y. Chen, 1979. "Summary and Implications," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Hyper-growth in Asian Economies, chapter 9, pages 179-186, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Michal Perlman & Brooke Fletcher & Olesya Falenchuk & Ashley Brunsek & Evelyn McMullen & Prakesh S Shah, 2017. "Child-Staff Ratios in Early Childhood Education and Care Settings and Child Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nina T. Dalgaard & Anja Bondebjerg & Rasmus Klokker & Bjørn C. A. Viinholt & Jens Dietrichson, 2022. "Adult/child ratio and group size in early childhood education or care to promote the development of children aged 0–5 years: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. Joseph Hotz & Mo Xiao, 2011. "The Impact of Regulations on the Supply and Quality of Care in Child Care Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(5), pages 1775-1805, August.
    2. Kristina Reineke, 2020. "The Influence of Digitization on the Emotional Exhaustion of Employees: The Moderating Role of Traditional Job Resources and Age," Working Papers Dissertations 62, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    3. V. Joseph Hotz & Mo Xiao, 2005. "The Impact of Minimum Quality Standards on Firm Entry, Exit and Product Quality: The Case of the Child Care Market," Working Papers 05-28, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    4. Amber Chen, 2021. "Exploration of implementation practices of Montessori education in mainland China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Thomas, Johanna M., 2017. "Early truancy evaluation: Replication of an evaluation using a regression discontinuity design," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 150-160.
    6. Doris Bergen Sponseller & Joel S. Fink, 1982. "Public Policy Toward Children: Identifying the Problems," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 461(1), pages 14-20, May.
    7. Orli Bobek & Adiv Gal & David Saltz & Uzi Motro, 2018. "Effect of nest-site microclimatic conditions on nesting success in the Lesser Kestrel (Falco naumanni)," Discussion Paper Series dp721, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    8. Raphael M. Herr & Katharina Diehl & Sven Schneider & Nina Osenbruegge & Nicole Memmer & Steffi Sachse & Stephanie Hoffmann & Benjamin Wachtler & Max Herke & Claudia R. Pischke & Anna Novelli & Jennife, 2021. "Which Meso-Level Characteristics of Early Childhood Education and Care Centers Are Associated with Health, Health Behavior, and Well-Being of Young Children? Findings of a Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Naja Ferjan Ramírez & Kaveri K. Sheth & Patricia K. Kuhl, 2021. "The Effects of Age, Dosage, and Poverty on Second Language Learning through SparkLing TM in Infant Education Centers in Madrid, Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Dote, Grace, 1982. "Economic Research Of Interest To Agriculture, 1979-1981," Economic Research of Interest to Agriculture 7291, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    11. William Gormley JR, 1999. "Regulating Child Care Quality," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 563(1), pages 116-129, May.
    12. Nina T. Dalgaard & Anja Bondebjerg & Rasmus Klokker & Bjørn C. A. Viinholt & Jens Dietrichson, 2022. "Adult/child ratio and group size in early childhood education or care to promote the development of children aged 0–5 years: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    13. Thomas, Johanna M. & Lemieux, Catherine M. & Rhodes, Judith L.F. & Vlosky, Denese Ashbaugh, 2011. "Early truancy intervention: Results of an evaluation using a regression discontinuity design," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1563-1572, September.
    14. David M. Blau & Alison P. Hagy, 1998. "The Demand for Quality in Child Care," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(1), pages 104-146, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:16:y:2020:i:1:n:e1079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.