IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v8y2021i1d10.1057_s41599-021-00934-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploration of implementation practices of Montessori education in mainland China

Author

Listed:
  • Amber Chen

    (Qingdao University)

Abstract

This descriptive research work highlights the implementation practices of Montessori education in mainland China and the concerns over Montessori education’s localization in mainland China. Localization can be understood as the adaptive process Montessori education undergoes in order to fit within Chinese culture. Two hundred and ten in-service Montessori teachers and administrators in China were surveyed to discover information concerning implementation practices in the following areas: mixed-aged classrooms, whether classrooms were co-teaching, student-to-teacher ratios, and morning and afternoon work cycles. The study found that the majority of classrooms were mixed-aged, reflecting high-fidelity Montessori practices. However, it also found that classrooms are co-teaching, have lower student–teacher ratios, and shortened work cycles, reflecting a departure from high-fidelity Montessori implementation. While localization should be considered to safeguard Montessori education’s sustainability, Chinese Montessori educators should also reflect on these findings as high implementation fidelity has been linked to better student outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Amber Chen, 2021. "Exploration of implementation practices of Montessori education in mainland China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:8:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-021-00934-3
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-021-00934-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-021-00934-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-021-00934-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michal Perlman & Brooke Fletcher & Olesya Falenchuk & Ashley Brunsek & Evelyn McMullen & Prakesh S Shah, 2017. "Child-Staff Ratios in Early Childhood Education and Care Settings and Child Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina T. Dalgaard & Anja Bondebjerg & Rasmus Klokker & Bjørn C. A. Viinholt & Jens Dietrichson, 2020. "PROTOCOL: Adult/child ratio and group size in early childhood education or care to promote the development of children aged 0–5 years: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), March.
    2. Raphael M. Herr & Katharina Diehl & Sven Schneider & Nina Osenbruegge & Nicole Memmer & Steffi Sachse & Stephanie Hoffmann & Benjamin Wachtler & Max Herke & Claudia R. Pischke & Anna Novelli & Jennife, 2021. "Which Meso-Level Characteristics of Early Childhood Education and Care Centers Are Associated with Health, Health Behavior, and Well-Being of Young Children? Findings of a Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Naja Ferjan Ramírez & Kaveri K. Sheth & Patricia K. Kuhl, 2021. "The Effects of Age, Dosage, and Poverty on Second Language Learning through SparkLing TM in Infant Education Centers in Madrid, Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Nina T. Dalgaard & Anja Bondebjerg & Rasmus Klokker & Bjørn C. A. Viinholt & Jens Dietrichson, 2022. "Adult/child ratio and group size in early childhood education or care to promote the development of children aged 0–5 years: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:8:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-021-00934-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.