IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/amposc/v61y2017i4p820-835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics of Policymaking: Stepping Back to Leap Forward, Stepping Forward to Keep Back

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Buisseret
  • Dan Bernhardt

Abstract

We study dynamic policymaking when today's policy agreement becomes tomorrow's status quo, agents account for the consequences of today's policies for future policy outcomes, and there is uncertainty about who will hold future political power to propose and veto future policy changes. Today's agenda setter holds back from fully exploiting present opportunities to move policy toward her ideal point whenever future proposer and veto players are likely to be aligned either in favor of reform or against it. Otherwise, agenda setters advance their short‐run interests. Optimal proposals can vary discontinuously and nonmonotonically with political fundamentals.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Buisseret & Dan Bernhardt, 2017. "Dynamics of Policymaking: Stepping Back to Leap Forward, Stepping Forward to Keep Back," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(4), pages 820-835, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:61:y:2017:i:4:p:820-835
    DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12301
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajps.12301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gersbach, Hans & Jackson, Matthew O. & Muller, Philippe & Tejada, Oriol, 2023. "Electoral competition with costly policy changes: A dynamic perspective," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    2. Per F Andersson & Johannes Lindvall, 2018. "Crises, investments, and political institutions," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 30(4), pages 410-430, October.
    3. Aurélie Cassette & Etienne Farvaque, 2019. "Sticky decentralization? Evidence from the French school reform," Economics Working Paper from Condorcet Center for political Economy at CREM-CNRS 2019-03-ccr, Condorcet Center for political Economy.
    4. Zapal, Jan, 2020. "Simple Markovian equilibria in dynamic spatial legislative bargaining," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Morelli, Massimo & Osnabrügge, Moritz & Vannoni, Matia, 2020. "Legislative Activity and Private Benefits: A Natural Experiment in New Zealand," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 565-570, July.
    6. Gersbach, Hans & Muller, Philippe & Tejada, Oriol, 2019. "Costs of change and political polarization," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Blumenthal, Benjamin, 2022. "Policymaking under Influence," SocArXiv 7uw3j, Center for Open Science.
    8. Lee, Barton E., 2022. "Gridlock, leverage, and policy bundling," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Hülya Eraslan & Kirill S. Evdokimov & Jan Zápal, 2022. "Dynamic Legislative Bargaining," Springer Books, in: Emin Karagözoğlu & Kyle B. Hyndman (ed.), Bargaining, chapter 0, pages 151-175, Springer.
    10. Austen-Smith, David & Dziuda, Wioletta & Harstad, Bård & Loeper, Antoine, 2019. "Gridlock and inefficient policy instruments," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(4), November.
    11. Gleason Judd & Lawrence S. Rothenberg, 2020. "Flexibility or Stability? Analyzing Proposals to Reform the Separation of Powers," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 309-324, April.
    12. Vincent Anesi & Peter Buisseret, 2023. "Collective screening," Discussion Papers 2023-01, Nottingham Interdisciplinary Centre for Economic and Political Research (NICEP).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:61:y:2017:i:4:p:820-835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5907 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.