IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/accper/v17y2018i2p275-305.html

Environmental and Social Matters in Mandatory Corporate Reporting: An Academic Note

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Schneider
  • Giovanna Michelon
  • Mari Paananen

Abstract

This note provides an overview of mandatory corporate reporting for environmental and social matters in Canada, the United States and the EU. When researchers and educators consider reporting on these matters, they often look to voluntary corporate reporting. However, we argue that a lot of related information exists in companies’ mandatory reports, either in the disclosures dictated by securities regulators, or via other required channels. Our objective is threefold. First, to describe what currently exists regarding mandatory reporting on environmental and social matters (to inform). Second, to discuss several of the current ongoing debates regarding such reporting (to encourage discourse). Third, to encourage research into the mandatory reporting of environmental and social matters. Questions environnementales et sociales dans l'information obligatoire communiquée par l'entreprise : un bref essai Résumé Les auteurs proposent un survol de la communication par les entreprises d'information obligatoire relative aux questions environnementales et sociales au Canada, aux États‐Unis et dans les pays de l'UE. Les chercheurs et les formateurs qui s'intéressent à la communication d'information sur ces sujets se concentrent souvent sur l'information facultative communiquée par les entreprises. Or, de l'avis des auteurs, les déclarations obligatoires des sociétés contiennent bon nombre de renseignements apparentés, soit dans les informations qu'exigent les autorités de réglementation des valeurs mobilières soit dans d'autres informations dont la communication leur est imposée. Les auteurs poursuivent un triple objectif : premièrement, décrire en quoi consiste actuellement l'information obligatoire relative aux questions environnementales et sociales (dans le but d'informer) ; deuxièmement, analyser plusieurs des débats dont fait actuellement l'objet la communication de cette information (afin de favoriser les échanges de vues) ; troisièmement, stimuler la recherche dans le domaine de l'information obligatoire relative aux questions environnementales et sociales.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Schneider & Giovanna Michelon & Mari Paananen, 2018. "Environmental and Social Matters in Mandatory Corporate Reporting: An Academic Note," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 275-305, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:accper:v:17:y:2018:i:2:p:275-305
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3838.12173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12173
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3838.12173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O'Dwyer, Brendan & Owen, David L., 2005. "Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: a critical evaluation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 205-229.
    2. Barbu, Elena M. & Dumontier, Pascal & Feleagă, Niculae & Feleagă, Liliana, 2014. "Mandatory Environmental Disclosures by Companies Complying with IASs/IFRSs: The Cases of France, Germany, and the UK," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 231-247.
    3. Mia Kaspersen & Thomas Riise Johansen, 2016. "Changing Social and Environmental Reporting Systems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 731-749, June.
    4. Hannes Hofmann & Martin C. Schleper & Constantin Blome, 2018. "Conflict Minerals and Supply Chain Due Diligence: An Exploratory Study of Multi-tier Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 115-141, January.
    5. Campbell, Katherine & Sefcik, Stephan E. & Soderstrom, Naomi S., 1998. "Site uncertainty, allocation uncertainty, and superfund liability valuation," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4-5), pages 331-366.
    6. Thomas E. Schneider, 2011. "Is Environmental Performance a Determinant of Bond Pricing? Evidence from the U.S. Pulp and Paper and Chemical Industries," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1537-1561, December.
    7. Matthew Wegener & Réal Labelle, 2017. "Value Relevance of Environmental Provisions Pre‐ and Post‐IFRS," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 139-168, September.
    8. Clarkson, Peter M. & Li, Yue & Richardson, Gordon D. & Vasvari, Florin P., 2008. "Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(4-5), pages 303-327.
    9. Thomas Schneider & Giovanna Michelon & Michael Maier, 2017. "Environmental liabilities and diversity in practice under international financial reporting standards," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 378-403, February.
    10. Christensen, Hans B. & Floyd, Eric & Liu, Lisa Yao & Maffett, Mark, 2017. "The real effects of mandated information on social responsibility in financial reports: Evidence from mine-safety records," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 284-304.
    11. Islam, Muhammad Azizul & van Staden, Chris J., 2018. "Social movement NGOs and the comprehensiveness of conflict mineral disclosures: evidence from global companies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-19.
    12. Barth, Me & Mcnichols, Mf, 1994. "Estimation And Market Valuation Of Environmental Liabilities Relating To Superfund Sites," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32, pages 177-209.
    13. Derek Johnston & Steve Rock, 2005. "Earnings Management to Minimize Superfund Clean†up and Transaction Costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 617-642, September.
    14. repec:hal:journl:halshs-01319288 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Elena Barbu & Pascal Dumontier & Niculae Feleagă & Liliana Feleagă, 2014. "Mandatory Environmental Disclosures by Companies Complying with IASs/IFRSs: The Cases of France, Germany, and the UK," Post-Print halshs-01025802, HAL.
    16. Giovanna Michelon & Saverio Bozzolan & Sergio Beretta, 2015. "Board monitoring and internal control system disclosure in different regulatory environments," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(1), pages 138-164, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simona Fiandrino & Alberto Tonelli, 2021. "A Text-Mining Analysis on the Review of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive: Bringing Value Creation for Stakeholders into Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsang, Albert & Frost, Tracie & Cao, Huijuan, 2023. "Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    2. Jane Andrew & Max Baker, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: The Last 40 Years and a Path to Sharing Future Insights," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(1), pages 35-65, March.
    3. Haozhe Song & Gunnar Rimmel, 2025. "Debtholders' reaction to sustainability reporting regulations: International evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 88-115, January.
    4. Jonathan Maurice, 2019. "When environmental accounting choices are not only opportunistic: the case of environmental accounting provisions [Quand les choix comptables liés à l’environnement ne sont pas qu’opportunistes : cas des provisions comptables environnementales]," Post-Print hal-02128271, HAL.
    5. Florence Depoers & Tiphaine Jérôme, 2017. "Environmental expenditure disclosure strategies in a regulated context [Stratégies de publication des dépenses environnementales dans un cadre réglementaire]," Post-Print hal-01576195, HAL.
    6. Radhakrishnan, Suresh & Tsang, Albert & Liu, Rubing, 2018. "A Corporate Social Responsibility Framework for Accounting Research," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 274-294.
    7. Matthew Wegener & Réal Labelle, 2017. "Value Relevance of Environmental Provisions Pre‐ and Post‐IFRS," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 139-168, September.
    8. Zhihua Cheng & Feng Wang & Christine Keung & Yongxiu Bai, 2017. "Will Corporate Political Connection Influence the Environmental Information Disclosure Level? Based on the Panel Data of A-Shares from Listed Companies in Shanghai Stock Market," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 209-221, June.
    9. Patricia Milanés Montero & Esteban Pérez Calderón & Ana Isabel Lourenço Dias, 2020. "Transparency of Financial Reporting on Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowances: The Influence of Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Fayez A. Elayan & Kareen Brown & Jennifer Li & Yijia Chen, 2021. "The Market Response to Mandatory Conflict Mineral Disclosures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 13-42, February.
    11. Shu Hu & Chen Zhang & Yuanpu Ji & Chao Zhang, 2024. "Does environmental information disclosure tone affect corporate green innovation in China? Based on the institutional perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 12239-12282, May.
    12. Martínez-Ferrero, Jennifer & García-Sánchez, Isabel-María, 2017. "Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 102-118.
    13. Geert Braam & Florian Habermann & Sam Drissen, 2025. "CSR Decoupling and Assurance of CSR Reports: Do Combinations of Level, Scope, and Assurance Provider Matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 8065-8081, November.
    14. Lu Zhang & Yuan George Shan & Millicent Chang, 2021. "Can CSR Disclosure Protect Firm Reputation During Financial Restatements?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 157-184, September.
    15. Mădălina Dumitru & Justyna Dyduch & Raluca-Gina Gușe & Joanna Krasodomska, 2017. "Corporate Reporting Practices in Poland and Romania – An Ex-ante Study to the New Non-financial Reporting European Directive," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 279-304, September.
    16. Miao Yu & Ziyao San & Dan Shi & Albert Tsang, 2025. "Analyst forecasts worldwide: The impact of ESG information from diverse sources and regulatory mandates," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 25(2), June.
    17. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    18. Katharina Hombach & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2019. "Shaping Corporate Actions Through Targeted Transparency Regulation: A Framework and Review of Extant Evidence," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 71(2), pages 137-168, May.
    19. Denis Cormier & Marie-Josée Ledoux & Michel Magnan, 2010. "The Informational Contribution of Social and Environmental Disclosures for Investors," Post-Print hal-00481571, HAL.
    20. Aline Grahn, 2025. "Greenhouse Gas Disclosure: Evidence from Private Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 177-194, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:accper:v:17:y:2018:i:2:p:275-305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3838 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.