IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/quageo/v37y2018i2p7-15n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

City Resilience vs. Resilient City: Terminological Intricacies and Concept Inaccuracies

Author

Listed:
  • Mierzejewska Lidia

    (Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland)

  • Wdowicka Magdalena

    (Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

The concept of resilience has in recent years been one of the more commonly used urban development concepts. In the social sciences, the term is understood as a dynamic process that reflects a relatively good adaptation, irrespective of the hazards or traumatic experiences. It is linked with the concepts of risk, vulnerability and positive adaptation. The concept of resilience as used in the social sciences has been adapted by other disciplines, including research on the city, where the term is ambiguously and sometimes inconsistently defined. The aim of this study is to explain the term resilience, its reference to the city and to clear up ambiguities of the terminology related to the two lines of research on resilience in relation to the city as presented by the relevant literature: city resilience and the resilient city. Analyses show that both these terms, despite their widespread application, are at present imprecisely defined in the relevant literature and generally speaking used interchangeably, which makes their precise application difficult. In addition, the assumption that city resilience can be treated as a process that leads to a desired state of the resilient city, has not been confirmed. The correctness of the application of the second of these concepts (the resilient city) raises doubts, because it will probably never be possible to develop a city not vulnerable or fully resistant to various types of development perturbations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mierzejewska Lidia & Wdowicka Magdalena, 2018. "City Resilience vs. Resilient City: Terminological Intricacies and Concept Inaccuracies," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 37(2), pages 7-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:37:y:2018:i:2:p:7-15:n:9
    DOI: 10.2478/quageo-2018-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/quageo-2018-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abid Mehmood, 2016. "Of resilient places: planning for urban resilience," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 407-419, February.
    2. James Harrigan & Philippe Martin, 2002. "Terrorism and the resilience of cities," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 8(Nov), pages 97-116.
    3. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/9286 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Andy Pike & Stuart Dawley & John Tomaney, 2010. "Resilience, adaptation and adaptability," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 3(1), pages 59-70.
    5. Ron Martin & Peter Sunley & Ben Gardiner & Peter Tyler, 2016. "How Regions React to Recessions: Resilience and the Role of Economic Structure," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 561-585, April.
    6. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/9286 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/9286 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Timothy Beatley & Peter Newman, 2013. "Biophilic Cities Are Sustainable, Resilient Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Barnett, Jon, 2001. "Adapting to Climate Change in Pacific Island Countries: The Problem of Uncertainty," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 977-993, June.
    10. Susan L. Cutter & Bryan J. Boruff & W. Lynn Shirley, 2003. "Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 84(2), pages 242-261, June.
    11. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/9286 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Chukwumerije Okereke & Harriet Bulkeley & Heike Schroeder, 2009. "Conceptualizing Climate Governance Beyond the International Regime," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 9(1), pages 58-78, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maomao Zhang & Weigang Chen & Kui Cai & Xin Gao & Xuesong Zhang & Jinxiang Liu & Zhiyuan Wang & Deshou Li, 2019. "Analysis of the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Urban Resilience and Its Influencing Factors: A Case Study of 56 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tapio Riepponen & Mikko Moilanen & Jaakko Simonen, 2023. "Themes of resilience in the economics literature: A topic modeling approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 326-356, April.
    2. Kurikka, Heli & Grillitsch, Markus, 2020. "Resilience in the periphery: What an agency perspective can bring to the table," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/7, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    3. Alessia Arcidiacono & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2022. "Decentralisation and Resilience: A Multidimensional Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Alexandru Pavel & Bogdan Andrei Moldovan & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2020. "Urban or Rural: Does It Make A Difference for Economic Resilience? A Modelling Study on Economic and Cultural Geography in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-39, May.
    5. Ascani, Andrea & Faggian, Alessandra & Montresor, Sandro & Palma, Alessandro, 2021. "Mobility in times of pandemics: Evidence on the spread of COVID19 in Italy's labour market areas," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 444-454.
    6. Seoyoung Yu & Donghyun Kim, 2021. "Changes in Regional Economic Resilience after the 2008 Global Economic Crisis: The Case of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Yi Chen & Zhicong Ye & Hui Liu & Ruishan Chen & Zhenhuan Liu & Hui Liu, 2021. "A GIS-Based Approach for Flood Risk Zoning by Combining Social Vulnerability and Flood Susceptibility: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Luciana Lazzeretti & Stefania Oliva & Niccolò Innocenti, 2019. "Exploring the role of industrial structure for regional economic resilience," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1917, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised May 2019.
    9. Giulia Urso & Marco Modica & Alessandra Faggian, 2019. "Resilience and Sectoral Composition Change of Italian Inner Areas in Response to the Great Recession," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Canfei He & Hantian Sheng, 2024. "Governance capacity, related variety and regional economic resilience under the COVID-19 epidemic: evidence from China," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(1), pages 291-321, June.
    11. Kelly Bergstrand & Brian Mayer & Babette Brumback & Yi Zhang, 2015. "Assessing the Relationship Between Social Vulnerability and Community Resilience to Hazards," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 391-409, June.
    12. Pedro Sánchez-Zamora & Rosa Gallardo-Cobos, 2019. "Diversity, Disparity and Territorial Resilience in the Context of the Economic Crisis: An Analysis of Rural Areas in Southern Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Dan He & Yahua Tang & Luyan Wang & Muhammad Mohsin, 2023. "Can increasing technological complexity help strengthen regional economic resilience?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4043-4070, December.
    14. Elias Giannakis & Christos T. Papadas, 2021. "Spatial Connectivity and Regional Economic Resilience in Turbulent Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-12, October.
    15. Alessandra de Renzis & Alessandra Faggian & Giulia Urso, 2022. "Distant but Vibrant Places. Local Determinants of Adaptability to Peripherality," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(5), pages 483-501, December.
    16. Xin Mai & Roger C. K. Chan, 2020. "Detecting the intellectual pathway of resilience thinking in urban and regional studies: A critical reflection on resilience literature," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 876-889, September.
    17. Leslie Gillespie‐Marthaler & Katherine Nelson & Hiba Baroud & Mark Abkowitz, 2019. "Selecting Indicators for Assessing Community Sustainable Resilience," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(11), pages 2479-2498, November.
    18. Jurgita Bruneckiene & Irena Pekarskiene & Oksana Palekiene & Zaneta Simanaviciene, 2019. "An Assessment of Socio-Economic Systems’ Resilience to Economic Shocks: The Case of Lithuanian Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, January.
    19. Hossam Hewidy & Susa Eräranta, 2025. "Bridging the gap: Exploring urban resilience and sustainability in Finnish regional development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 794-810, February.
    20. Kaiming Cheng & Xinyu Wang & Shucheng Liu & Yanjie Zhuang, 2024. "Spatial differences and dynamic evolution of economic resilience: from the perspective of China’s eight comprehensive economic zones," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1-33, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:37:y:2018:i:2:p:7-15:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.