IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v18y2024i1p2196-2210n1029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ESG Risks and Financial Performance. Analysis of Romanian-Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Vezeteu Cosmin-Dănuț

    (Transilvania University of Brașov, Brașov, Romania)

  • Stănciulescu Raluca-Ioana

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The term “sustainability” is often used interchangeably with the acronym ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance). This happens as investors trust ESG scores to provide an accurate measurement of a company's sustainability performance. The traditional approach for evaluating sustainability performance involves analysing the scores for a given company, for each of the 3 ESG pillars: Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance. Moreover, most studies show that these scores are positively correlated with financial performance. While this approach is rather straightforward, usually it is not exhaustive and fails to capture the risks behind a company's exposure to material ESG issues and its management. Therefore, this study proposes an approach based on material ESG risk, exposure and management scores. Particularly, this paper focuses on the sector-wide analysis of ESG risk scores and their correlation with financial performance, for Romanian-listed companies, using the most recent data from one of the largest ESG rating provider. The methods employed are data analysis & visualization and correlation analysis. The results reveal, on average, a year-on-year decrease of the ESG Risk Score for the selected companies, along with increased exposure to material ESG risks, yet better management of these risks. Interestingly, the results do not show a significant correlation between the selected ESG variables and financial performance, measured by ROE, ROA and Tobin's Q, though a significant positive correlation between the Exposure and Management scores and firm size, measured by Market Cap, is found. Although there are limitations to this paper, for example, related to sample size or timeframe, it provides valuable insights on both the sustainability performance of Romanian-listed companies and, more broadly, its relationship with financial performance from a regional perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Vezeteu Cosmin-Dănuț & Stănciulescu Raluca-Ioana, 2024. "ESG Risks and Financial Performance. Analysis of Romanian-Listed Companies," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 2196-2210.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:2196-2210:n:1029
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2024-0184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2024-0184
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2024-0184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michał Baran & Aneta Kuźniarska & Zbigniew J. Makieła & Anna Sławik & Magdalena M. Stuss, 2022. "Does ESG Reporting Relate to Corporate Financial Performance in the Context of the Energy Sector Transformation? Evidence from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Bjorg Jonsdottir & Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson & Lara Johannsdottir & Stefan Wendt, 2022. "Barriers to Using ESG Data for Investment Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Samuel Drempetic & Christian Klein & Bernhard Zwergel, 2020. "The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 333-360, November.
    4. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    5. Rajna Gibson Brandon & Philipp Krueger & Peter Steffen Schmidt, 2021. "ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(4), pages 104-127, October.
    6. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    7. Elisabeth Albertini, 2013. "Does Environmental Management Improve Financial Performance? A Meta-Analytical Review," Post-Print halshs-01887802, HAL.
    8. Aaron K. Chatterji & Rodolphe Durand & David I. Levine & Samuel Touboul, 2016. "Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1597-1614, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Louis T.W. & Cheong, Tsun Se & Wojewodzki, Michal & Chui, David, 2025. "The effect of ESG divergence on the financial performance of Hong Kong-listed firms: An artificial neural network approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    2. Muck, Matthias & Schmidl, Thomas, 2024. "Comparing ESG score weighting approaches and stock performance differentiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    3. Cini, Federico & Ferrari, Annalisa, 2025. "Towards the estimation of ESG ratings: A machine learning approach using balance sheet ratios," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PB).
    4. Bassen, Alexander & Kordsachia, Othar & Lopatta, Kerstin & Tan, Weiqiang, 2025. "Revenue alignment with the EU taxonomy regulation in developed markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Sun, Chenwei & Jin, Justin & Nainar, Khalid & Lobo, Gerald, 2024. "Does firms’ corporate social responsibility reduce crime?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PC).
    6. Rabab Abouarab & Tapas Mishra & Simon Wolfe, 2025. "Spotting Portfolio Greenwashing in Environmental Funds," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(4), pages 811-839, April.
    7. Andre Höck & Tobias Bauckloh & Maurice Dumrose & Christian Klein, 2023. "ESG criteria and the credit risk of corporate bond portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(7), pages 572-580, December.
    8. Davide Lauria & W. Brent Lindquist & Stefan Mittnik & Svetlozar T. Rachev, 2025. "Environmental, Social and Governance-Valued Portfolio Optimization and Dynamic Asset Pricing," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-33, March.
    9. Juris Dobrick & Christian Klein & Bernhard Zwergel, 2025. "ESG as risk factor," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(1), pages 44-70, February.
    10. Horn, Matthias & Oehler, Andreas, 2024. "Constructing stock portfolios by sorting on ESG ratings: Does the rating provider matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    11. Wen, Limin & Li, Junxue & Sheng, Jiliang & Zhang, Yi, 2025. "Active portfolio management in the face of ESG uncertainty: An agile framework for adaptive investment strategies," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(PA).
    12. Andreas Dimmelmeier, 2024. "Expanding the politics of measurement in sustainable finance: Reconceptualizing environmental, social and governance information as infrastructure," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(5), pages 761-781, August.
    13. Staněk Gyönyör, Lucie & Horváth, Matúš, 2024. "Does ESG affect stock market dependence? An empirical exploration of S&P 1200 companies shows the divergent nature of E–S–G pillars," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    14. Matthias Horn, 2023. "The Influence of ESG Ratings On Idiosyncratic Stock Risk: The Unrated, the Good, the Bad, and the Sinners," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 415-442, September.
    15. Liu, Xiangqiang & Yang, Qingqing & Wei, Kai & Dai, Peng-Fei, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    16. Ajithakumari Vijayappan Nair Biju & Snehith Jacob Kodiyatt & P. P. Nithi Krishna & Geetha Sreelekshmi, 2023. "ESG sentiments and divergent ESG scores: suggesting a framework for ESG rating," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(12), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Falko Paetzold & Timo Busch & Sebastian Utz & Anne Kellers, 2022. "Between impact and returns: Private investors and the sustainable development goals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3182-3197, November.
    18. Valeria D’Amato & Rita D’Ecclesia & Susanna Levantesi, 2022. "ESG score prediction through random forest algorithm," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 347-373, June.
    19. Rekha Pillai & Md. Aminul Islam & S. Sreejith & Husam Aldin Al-Malkawi, 2025. "Comparative analysis of environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings: do sectors and regions differ?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 29(1), pages 69-109, March.
    20. Francesco Cesarone & Manuel Luis Martino & Federica Ricca & Andrea Scozzari, 2023. "Managing ESG Ratings Disagreement in Sustainable Portfolio Selection," Papers 2312.10739, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:2196-2210:n:1029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.