IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v18y2024i1p1602-1612n1011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farm Carbon Footprint Measurement Frameworks Based on the Digitization and Environmental Sustainability Paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Pătărlăgeanu Simona Roxana

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania AGRIDATA – Center for Research, Innovation, Extension and Technological Transfer)

  • Constantin Marius

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania AGRIDATA – Center for Research, Innovation, Extension and Technological Transfer)

  • Dinu Mihai

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania AGRIDATA – Center for Research, Innovation, Extension and Technological Transfer)

  • Petrescu Irina Elena

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania AGRIDATA – Center for Research, Innovation, Extension and Technological Transfer)

  • Deaconu Elena Mădălina

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania AGRIDATA – Center for Research, Innovation, Extension and Technological Transfer)

Abstract

The use of digital technology in agriculture, such as sensors, satellites, and artificial intelligence, for developing sustainable agriculture and controlling the impacts of climate change, has been enhanced under the European Green Deal. Given the environmental exigencies, the agricultural sector must adapt to new technologies that ensure the sustainable development of the whole agri-food sector. This paper emphasizes the importance of measuring carbon footprints in agriculture as a tool for further improving the sustainability of the sector. Specifically, the research addresses the importance of sustainable technologies and practices, including agriculture, circular economy, and conservation agriculture, which play an important role in reducing carbon emissions from the agricultural sector. Thus, in the framework of the European Green Deal and digitalization, a bibliographic analysis was carried out using the Web of Science database to review the scientific interest on carbon footprint generated by farms. The aim of the paper is to tackle the significance given by the scientific community on the carbon footprint of farms in order to enhance the development of a comprehensive set of measures that can incorporate the sector’s social and environmental responsibility, and ensure further the right path towards a sustainable future without affecting the profitability of the small farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Pătărlăgeanu Simona Roxana & Constantin Marius & Dinu Mihai & Petrescu Irina Elena & Deaconu Elena Mădălina, 2024. "Farm Carbon Footprint Measurement Frameworks Based on the Digitization and Environmental Sustainability Paradigm," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1602-1612.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:1602-1612:n:1011
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2024-0133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2024-0133
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2024-0133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2017. "Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 1053-1070, May.
    2. Małgorzata Holka & Jolanta Kowalska & Magdalena Jakubowska, 2022. "Reducing Carbon Footprint of Agriculture—Can Organic Farming Help to Mitigate Climate Change?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Oleksandr Faichuk & Lesia Voliak & Taras Hutsol & Szymon Glowacki & Yuriy Pantsyr & Sergii Slobodian & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Zofia Gródek-Szostak, 2022. "European Green Deal: Threats Assessment for Agri-Food Exporting Countries to the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    4. William W. Hood & Concepción S. Wilson, 2001. "The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(2), pages 291-314, October.
    5. Andreea Apetrei & José Luis Sánchez-García & Juan Sapena, 2019. "The controversial link between entrepreneurial activity and inequality," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 485-502, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehdi Amirkhani & Igor Martek & Mark B. Luther, 2021. "Mapping Research Trends in Residential Construction Retrofitting: A Scientometric Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Nini Johana Marín-Rodríguez & Juan David González-Ruíz & Sergio Botero, 2025. "Towards New Strategies for Investing: Insights on Sustainable Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)," World, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Mehmet Karakus & Muhammet Usak & Alpay Ersozlu, 2021. "Emotions in Learning, Teaching, and Leadership: A Bibliometric Review of Asian Literature (1990–2018)," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    4. Sahil & Sandeep Kumar Sood, 2021. "Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in ICT-based disaster management literature," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 103-132, February.
    5. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    6. Jeong, Yujin & Park, Inchae & Yoon, Byungun, 2019. "Identifying emerging Research and Business Development (R&BD) areas based on topic modeling and visualization with intellectual property right data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 655-672.
    7. Prodhan Mahbub Ibna Seraj & Blanka Klimova & Rubina Khan, 2024. "Visualizing Research Trends in English Language Teaching (ELT) From 2013 to 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    8. Zhengyao Liu & Jing Huang & Yonghong Li & Xiaokang Liu & Fei Qiang & Yiping He, 2025. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Geological Hazards Monitoring Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Zuzanna Klos-Adamkiewicz & Sylwia Kowalska, 2024. "Assessment of the Transport Accessibility of the City's Bicycle Rental System in Szczecin - GIS-Based Analysis," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 474-490.
    10. Cai, Ya-Jun & Lo, Chris K.Y., 2020. "Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: A systematic review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    11. Charlie Karlsson & Björn Hammarfelt, 2025. "Correction: The growth and development of Nordic regional science research 1982–2022: bibliometric evidence from thirteen regional science journals," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(2), pages 1-1, June.
    12. Rosa Lombardi & Raffaele Trequattrini & Federico Schimperna & Myriam Cano-Rubio, 2021. "The Impact of Smart Technologies on theManagement and Strategic Control: A Structured Literature Review," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(suppl. 1), pages 11-30.
    13. Gregorio González-Alcaide, 2021. "Bibliometric studies outside the information science and library science field: uncontainable or uncontrollable?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6837-6870, August.
    14. Ying Guo & Xiantao Xiao, 2022. "Author-level altmetrics for the evaluation of Chinese scholars," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(2), pages 973-990, February.
    15. Maria Tunberg & Alistair R. Anderson, 2020. "Growing a small firm; experiences and managing difficult processes," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1445-1463, December.
    16. repec:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:specialb:p:721-737 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Fellnhofer, Katharina & Sornette, Didier, 2022. "Embracing The Intuitive-Analytical Paradox? How Intuitive And Analytical Decision-Making Drive Paradoxes In Simple And Complex Environments," OSF Preprints evjd6, Center for Open Science.
    18. Lin Hu & Qinghai Chen & Tingting Yang & Chuanjian Yi & Jing Chen, 2024. "Visualization and Analysis of Hotspots and Trends in Seafood Cold Chain Logistics Based on CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and RStudio Bibliometrix," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Luca Brunelli & Emiliano Borri & Anna Laura Pisello & Andrea Nicolini & Carles Mateu & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2024. "Thermal Energy Storage in Energy Communities: A Perspective Overview through a Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-27, July.
    20. Simon Zaby, 2019. "Science Mapping of the Global Knowledge Base on Microfinance: Influential Authors and Documents, 1989–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-21, July.
    21. Paul Donner, 2021. "Validation of the Astro dataset clustering solutions with external data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1619-1645, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:1602-1612:n:1011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.