IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/otamic/v17y2025i1p110-120n1007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government’s motives and investor’s commitment in public-private partnership procurement system adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Ojelabi Rapheal Abiodun

    (Department of Building Technology, Covenant University. Km 10, Idiroko Road, Cannanland, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria)

  • Amusan Lekan

    (Department of Building Technology, Covenant University. Km 10, Idiroko Road, Cannanland, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria)

  • Adewolu Adeoye Olugbenga

    (Department of Architecture, Belles University of Technology. Km 8, Idiroko Road, Benja Village, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria)

  • Olanipekun Oladeji Olubunmi

    (Project and Property Development Department, Ecobank Nigeria Limited, Victoria Island, Lagos State, Nigeria)

Abstract

The study examined the government’s motives in adopting public–private procurement (PPP) and its relationship with the private investor’s service commitment to infrastructure delivery. The study adopted a quantitative research method with a survey conducted using a structured questionnaire targeted at 384 respondents selected through random sampling. The data were analysed using mean, percentile and Pearson correlation statistical tools. The study identified 17 key motives responsible for the government adopting PPP in socio-economic infrastructure delivery. These motives were factored into three main groups: public infrastructure maintenance, financial and economic benefits; improved discipline in the contractual relationship and predictable path in infrastructure delivery and integration of innovative approach in enhancing infrastructure delivery. Therefore, the relationships between the three factored government’s motives and investor’s commitments, including finance, management, technical and operational services in PPP, were tested using the Pearson correlation statistical tool. The results showed that the motive for public infrastructure maintenance, financial and economic benefits of the government in PPP showed a significant relationship with the four services commitment of private partners. Also, the government’s motive for improved discipline in the contractual relationship and predictable path in infrastructure delivery showed significant relationships with technical, finance and management commitments of investors. Lastly, the government’s motive for the integration of innovative approaches in enhancing infrastructure delivery showed a significant relationship with only technical commitment. The outcome indicates that factors measuring government motive and investor's services commitment are mutually dependent and critical in ensuring a sustained relationship among stakeholders in a PPP arrangement for infrastructure procurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Ojelabi Rapheal Abiodun & Amusan Lekan & Adewolu Adeoye Olugbenga & Olanipekun Oladeji Olubunmi, 2025. "Government’s motives and investor’s commitment in public-private partnership procurement system adoption," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 110-120.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:110-120:n:1007
    DOI: 10.2478/otmcj-2025-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2025-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/otmcj-2025-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julie Hermans & Hendrik Slabbinck & Johanna Vanderstraeten & Jacqueline Brassey & Marcus Dejardin & Dendi Ramdani & Arjen Van Witteloostuijn, 2017. "The Power Paradox: Implicit and Explicit Power Motives, and the Importance Attached to Prosocial Organizational Goals in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, November.
    2. Han Xu, 2023. "Does government support affect private partners’ profitability in public–private partnerships? Evidence from China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Roehrich, Jens K. & Lewis, Michael A. & George, Gerard, 2014. "Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 110-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio & Shashi,, 2019. "Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 172-194.
    3. Livio Cricelli & Serena Strazzullo, 2021. "The Economic Aspect of Digital Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Guangbin Wang & Yingxia Xue & Mirosław Jan Skibniewski & Jiule Song & Hao Lu, 2018. "Analysis of Private Investors Conduct Strategies by Governments Supervising Public-Private Partnership Projects in the New Media Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Radityo Putro Handrito & Hendrik Slabbinck & Johanna Vanderstraeten, 2023. "Stuck in short-term, daily operations, or not?: Unraveling SME’s long-term orientation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1723-1745, December.
    6. Cao, Fuguo & Li, Runyu & Guo, Shaobo, 2024. "Rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships in China: A sustainable public procurement perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Wen, Tianzuo & Qiang, Wei & Liu, Xingjian, 2022. "Exploring the geography of urban comprehensive development in mainland Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Katharina Spraul & Julia Thaler, 2020. "Partnering for good? An analysis of how to achieve sustainability-related outcomes in public–private partnerships," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 485-511, July.
    9. Gordon Dugle & Stephen Debar Kpinpuo & Benjamin Baisie Ghartey, 2021. "From paper to practice: an exploratory study of policy making and implementation in alternative forms of healthcare public‐private partnership in Ghana," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 866-884, May.
    10. Achard, Paola Olimpia & Di Berardino, Antonina, 2018. "Public Private Partnerships: Strategic Assets and Managerial Models," 29th European Regional ITS Conference, Trento 2018 184925, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    11. Daan Kolkman & Gwendolyn K Lee & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2024. "Data science and automation in the process of theorizing: Machine learning’s power of induction in the co-duction cycle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-30, November.
    12. Nachemson-Ekwall , Sophie, 2019. "A Swedish market for sustainability-related and socially labelled bonds. Institutional investors as drivers," SSE Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2019:3, Stockholm School of Economics.
    13. Lauri Koskela & John Rooke & Mohan Siriwardena, 2016. "Evaluation of the Promotion of Through-Life Management in Public Private Partnerships for Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Haitham Nobanee & Maryam Alhajjar & Ghada Abushairah & Safaa Al Harbi, 2021. "Reputational Risk and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis of Relevant Literature," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Mohammed Khaled Al-Hanawi & Sarh Almubark & Ameerah M N Qattan & Agnieszka Cenkier & Ewa Agnieszka Kosycarz, 2020. "Barriers to the implementation of public-private partnerships in the healthcare sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Surbhi Gupta & Anil Kumar Sharma, 2022. "Evolution of infrastructure as an asset class: a systematic literature review and thematic analysis," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 173-200, May.
    17. Gabriel Castelblanco & Jose Guevara & Harrison Mesa & Diego Flores, 2020. "Risk Allocation in Unsolicited and Solicited Road Public-Private Partnerships: Sustainability and Management Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    18. Cristina - Iuliana PETROVAN (MARANDA), 2023. "Public-Private Partnership'S Ascent And Fall In Europe," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 48-58, December.
    19. Hugo J. Fuentes & Gustavo Mendoza & Miguel A. Montoya & Ismael Aguilar, 2021. "Public-private partnerships in Mexico: Challenges and opportunities at local level," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 22(1), pages 35-52, March.
    20. Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Emilio Esposito, 2018. "Environmental Sustainability and Energy-Efficient Supply Chain Management: A Review of Research Trends and Proposed Guidelines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-36, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:110-120:n:1007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.