IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/otamic/v15y2023i1p23-33n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the social legitimacy of urban road PPPs in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Afieroho Ulohomuno Eze

    (Alma Mater Europaea ECM, Slovenska ulica 17, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia)

  • Li Yongkui

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, Shanghai, China)

  • Han Yilong

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, Shanghai, China)

  • Radujkovic Mladen

    (Alma Mater Europaea ECM, Slovenska ulica 17, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia)

Abstract

Public–private partnerships (PPPs) have become an effective and efficient contractual agreement between the state and the private sector for providing infrastructure services. Yet, their social acceptance and legitimacy are questionable. Communities accept such changes to their social contract with the government only if the PPPs are perceived to be legitimate as public institutions are not trusted by the communities. As a result, the disappointments and controversial underperformance of PPPs in Nigeria, like most developing countries, have been generally associated with community opposition due to any agency or competence-related failure. Hence, the need for this study. Drawing on data from two urban road PPPs in Nigeria, we identify the following three deeply internalised shared beliefs that shape a community group’s perceptions and attitudes towards an infrastructure built by PPPs in their neighbourhood: the public services should be provided for free, PPPs are created mainly to serve perceived ‘corrupt’ politicians and public institutions are not effective and efficient in service delivery. These beliefs, combined with the community’s structural power, explain why some community groups oppose (or support) infrastructure PPPs within their proximity, and the growing legitimacy challenge PPPs face. Our paper in this regard provides a guidance for designing effective and targeted community engagement strategies for PPP projects and contributed to PPP stakeholder management and mainstream stakeholder management research.

Suggested Citation

  • Afieroho Ulohomuno Eze & Li Yongkui & Han Yilong & Radujkovic Mladen, 2023. "Exploring the social legitimacy of urban road PPPs in Nigeria," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 23-33, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:23-33:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/otmcj-2023-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2023-0004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/otmcj-2023-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Schneider & Sybille Sachs, 2017. "The Impact of Stakeholder Identities on Value Creation in Issue-Based Stakeholder Networks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 41-57, August.
    2. James Leigland, 2018. "Public-Private Partnerships in Developing Countries: The Emerging Evidence-based Critique," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 33(1), pages 103-134.
    3. Jonas Tallberg & Michael Zürn, 2019. "The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: introduction and framework," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 581-606, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Kentikelenis & Erik Voeten, 2021. "Legitimacy challenges to the liberal world order: Evidence from United Nations speeches, 1970–2018," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 721-754, October.
    2. Felicity Vabulas, 2020. "Christian Kreuder-Sonnen. 2019. Emergency Powers of International Organizations: Between Normalization and Containment. (Oxford: Oxford University Press)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 969-973, October.
    3. Cynthia Couette, 2024. "Epistemic competition in global governance: The case of pharmaceutical patents," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(3), pages 516-527, June.
    4. Georgios Dimitropoulos, 2022. "The use of blockchain by international organizations: effectiveness and legitimacy [The governance of blockchain dispute resolution]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(3), pages 328-342.
    5. Nizkorodov, Evgenia, 2021. "Evaluating risk allocation and project impacts of sustainability-oriented water public–private partnerships in Southern California: A comparative case analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Martin Binder & Monika Heupel, 2020. "Rising Powers, UN Security Council Reform, and the Failure of Rhetorical Coercion," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 93-103, October.
    7. Stacie E. Goddard, 2020. "Revolution from the Inside: Institutions, Legitimation Strategies, and Rhetorical Pathways of Institutional Change," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 83-92, October.
    8. Nicole B. Baker & Christian Haddad, 2024. "Private ownership and management control decisions in infrastructure from the perspective of Transaction Cost Theory: Evidence from emerging economies," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 764-791, July.
    9. Rauh, Christian, 2022. "Clear messages to the European public? The language of European Commission press releases 1985–2020," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-19.
    10. Maria J. Debre & Hylke Dijkstra, 2023. "Are international organisations in decline? An absolute and relative perspective on institutional change," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 16-30, February.
    11. Senem Aydın‐Düzgit & Gergana Noutcheva, 2022. "External Contestations of Europe: Russia and Turkey as Normative Challengers?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1815-1831, November.
    12. Laiz, Álvaro Morcillo, 2022. "The Cold War Origins of Global IR. The Rockefeller Foundation and Realism in Latin America," SocArXiv g9xqb, Center for Open Science.
    13. FabianG. Neuner, 2020. "Public Opinion and the Legitimacy of Global Private EnvironmentalGovernance," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(1), pages 60-81, February.
    14. Yoram Z. Haftel & Tobias Lenz, 2022. "Measuring institutional overlap in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 323-347, April.
    15. Hana Trollman & James Colwill & Alan Brejnholt, 2020. "Ecologically Embedded Design in Manufacturing: Legitimation within Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    16. Sina Özdemir & Christian Rauh, 2022. "A Bird’s Eye View: Supranational EU Actors on Twitter," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 133-145.
    17. Chris F. Wright & Colm McLaughlin, 2021. "Trade Union Legitimacy and Legitimation Politics in Australia and New Zealand," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 338-369, July.
    18. Jorge Fleta‐Asín & Fernando Muñoz, 2021. "Renewable energy public–private partnerships in developing countries: Determinants of private investment," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 653-670, July.
    19. Birte Freudenreich & Florian Lüdeke-Freund & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 3-18, September.
    20. Goran Amović & Rado Maksimović & Sonja Bunčić, 2020. "Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in Transition Conditions: An Empirical Study in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-29, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:23-33:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.