IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v36y2020i4p803-825n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Improved Fellegi-Sunter Framework for Probabilistic Record Linkage Between Large Data Sets

Author

Listed:
  • Fortini Marco

    (Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat) – Directorate for Methodology and Statistical Process Design, Via C. Balbo, 16, 00184, Rome, Italy.)

Abstract

Record linkage addresses the problem of identifying pairs of records coming from different sources and referred to the same unit of interest. Fellegi and Sunter propose an optimal statistical test in order to assign the match status to the candidate pairs, in which the needed parameters are obtained through EM algorithm directly applied to the set of candidate pairs, without recourse to training data. However, this procedure has a quadratic complexity as the two lists to be matched grow. In addition, a large bias of EM-estimated parameters is also produced in this case, so that the problem is tackled by reducing the set of candidate pairs through filtering methods such as blocking. Unfortunately, the probability that excluded pairs would be actually true-matches cannot be assessed through such methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Fortini Marco, 2020. "An Improved Fellegi-Sunter Framework for Probabilistic Record Linkage Between Large Data Sets," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(4), pages 803-825, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:36:y:2020:i:4:p:803-825:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/jos-2020-0039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2020-0039
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jos-2020-0039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neykov, N. & Filzmoser, P. & Dimova, R. & Neytchev, P., 2007. "Robust fitting of mixtures using the trimmed likelihood estimator," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 299-308, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao, Weixin & Wei, Yan & Yu, Chun, 2014. "Robust mixture regression using the t-distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 116-127.
    2. L. García-Escudero & A. Gordaliza & A. Mayo-Iscar, 2013. "Comments on: model-based clustering and classification with non-normal mixture distributions," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 22(4), pages 459-461, November.
    3. Marco Riani & Anthony C. Atkinson & Aldo Corbellini, 2023. "Automatic robust Box–Cox and extended Yeo–Johnson transformations in regression," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 75-102, March.
    4. A. Pedro Duarte Silva & Peter Filzmoser & Paula Brito, 2018. "Outlier detection in interval data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(3), pages 785-822, September.
    5. Pietro Coretto & Christian Hennig, 2010. "A simulation study to compare robust clustering methods based on mixtures," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 4(2), pages 111-135, September.
    6. Meng Li & Sijia Xiang & Weixin Yao, 2016. "Robust estimation of the number of components for mixtures of linear regression models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1539-1555, December.
    7. Chalabi, Yohan / Y. & Wuertz, Diethelm, 2010. "Weighted trimmed likelihood estimator for GARCH models," MPRA Paper 26536, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Shi, Jianhong & Chen, Kun & Song, Weixing, 2014. "Robust errors-in-variables linear regression via Laplace distribution," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 113-120.
    9. L. A. García-Escudero & A. Gordaliza & C. Matrán & A. Mayo-Iscar, 2018. "Comments on “The power of monitoring: how to make the most of a contaminated multivariate sample”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(4), pages 605-608, December.
    10. Cheng, Tsung-Chi, 2011. "Robust diagnostics for the heteroscedastic regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1845-1866, April.
    11. C. Ruwet & L. García-Escudero & A. Gordaliza & A. Mayo-Iscar, 2013. "On the breakdown behavior of the TCLUST clustering procedure," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 466-487, September.
    12. Neykov, N.M. & Filzmoser, P. & Neytchev, P.N., 2012. "Robust joint modeling of mean and dispersion through trimming," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 34-48, January.
    13. García-Escudero, L.A. & Gordaliza, A. & Mayo-Iscar, A. & San Martín, R., 2010. "Robust clusterwise linear regression through trimming," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3057-3069, December.
    14. Bai, Xiuqin & Yao, Weixin & Boyer, John E., 2012. "Robust fitting of mixture regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 2347-2359.
    15. L. García-Escudero & A. Gordaliza & A. Mayo-Iscar, 2014. "A constrained robust proposal for mixture modeling avoiding spurious solutions," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(1), pages 27-43, March.
    16. Andrea Cerioli & Domenico Perrotta, 2014. "Robust clustering around regression lines with high density regions," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(1), pages 5-26, March.
    17. Hu, Hao & Yao, Weixin & Wu, Yichao, 2017. "The robust EM-type algorithms for log-concave mixtures of regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 14-26.
    18. Pietro Coretto & Christian Hennig, 2016. "Robust Improper Maximum Likelihood: Tuning, Computation, and a Comparison With Other Methods for Robust Gaussian Clustering," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1648-1659, October.
    19. Holland, E.P. & Burrow, J.F. & Dytham, C. & Aegerter, J.N., 2009. "Modelling with uncertainty: Introducing a probabilistic framework to predict animal population dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(9), pages 1203-1217.
    20. Andrea Cappozzo & Francesca Greselin & Thomas Brendan Murphy, 2020. "A robust approach to model-based classification based on trimming and constraints," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(2), pages 327-354, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:36:y:2020:i:4:p:803-825:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.