IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v32y2016i2p259-286n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On a Modular Approach to the Design of Integrated Social Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannidis Evangelos

    (Athens University of Economics and Business, Patission str. 76, 10434 Athens, Greece.)

  • Merkouris Takis

    (Athens University of Economics and Business, Patission str. 76, 10434 Athens, Greece.)

  • Zhang Li-Chun

    (University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom and Statistics Norway.)

  • Karlberg Martin

    (European Commission (Eurostat), L-2920 Luxembourg.)

  • Petrakos Michalis

    (Agilis SA, Acadimias 96-100, 10677 Athens, Greece)

  • Reis Fernando

    (European Commission (Eurostat), L-2920 Luxembourg.)

  • Stavropoulos Photis

    (Agilis SA, Acadimias 96-100, 10677 Athens, Greece.)

Abstract

This article considers a modular approach to the design of integrated social surveys. The approach consists of grouping variables into ‘modules’, each of which is then allocated to one or more ‘instruments’. Each instrument is then administered to a random sample of population units, and each sample unit responds to all modules of the instrument. This approach offers a way of designing a system of integrated social surveys that balances the need to limit the cost and the need to obtain sufficient information. The allocation of the modules to instruments draws on the methodology of split questionnaire designs. The composition of the instruments, that is, how the modules are allocated to instruments, and the corresponding sample sizes are obtained as a solution to an optimisation problem. This optimisation involves minimisation of respondent burden and data collection cost, while respecting certain design constraints usually encountered in practice. These constraints may include, for example, the level of precision required and dependencies between the variables. We propose using a random search algorithm to find approximate optimal solutions to this problem. The algorithm is proved to fulfil conditions that ensure convergence to the global optimum and can also produce an efficient design for a split questionnaire.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannidis Evangelos & Merkouris Takis & Zhang Li-Chun & Karlberg Martin & Petrakos Michalis & Reis Fernando & Stavropoulos Photis, 2016. "On a Modular Approach to the Design of Integrated Social Surveys," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(2), pages 259-286, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:32:y:2016:i:2:p:259-286:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/jos-2016-0013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2016-0013
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jos-2016-0013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lejeune, Miguel A., 2003. "Heuristic optimization of experimental designs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(3), pages 484-498, June.
    2. Angelis, L. & Bora-Senta, E. & Moyssiadis, C., 2001. "Optimal exact experimental designs with correlated errors through a simulated annealing algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 275-296, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patan, Maciej & Bogacka, Barbara, 2007. "Optimum experimental designs for dynamic systems in the presence of correlated errors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 5644-5661, August.
    2. Hertel, Ida & Kohler, Michael, 2013. "Estimation of the optimal design of a nonlinear parametric regression problem via Monte Carlo experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Winker, Peter & Gilli, Manfred, 2004. "Applications of optimization heuristics to estimation and modelling problems," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 211-223, September.
    4. Payne, Roger W., 2003. "General balance, large data sets and extensions to unbalanced treatment structures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 297-304, October.
    5. Haoyu Wang & Chongqi Zhang, 2022. "The mixture design threshold accepting algorithm for generating $$\varvec{D}$$ D -optimal designs of the mixture models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 345-371, April.
    6. Mariano Amo-Salas & Jesús López-Fidalgo & Emilio Porcu, 2013. "Optimal designs for some stochastic processes whose covariance is a function of the mean," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 159-181, March.
    7. CUERVO, Daniel Palhazi & GOOS, Peter & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2013. "An iterated local search algorithm for the construction of large scale D-optimal experimental designs," Working Papers 2013006, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    8. Karvanen, Juha & Kulathinal, Sangita & Gasbarra, Dario, 2009. "Optimal designs to select individuals for genotyping conditional on observed binary or survival outcomes and non-genetic covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 1782-1793, March.
    9. Łukasz Smaga, 2016. "A note on D-optimal chemical balance weighing designs with autocorrelated observations," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 721-730, September.
    10. Vieira Jr., Hélcio & Sanchez, Susan & Kienitz, Karl Heinz & Belderrain, Mischel Carmen Neyra, 2011. "Generating and improving orthogonal designs by using mixed integer programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 629-638, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:32:y:2016:i:2:p:259-286:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.