IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ijcoma/v60y2024i1p27-43n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MOOC awareness and utilization among students of selected Polish universities

Author

Listed:
  • Geryk Marcin

    (* Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland)

Abstract

The main aim of the article was to examine Polish students’ awareness about MOOCs. For this purpose, the following issues were examined: the percentage of students aware of the existence of free courses, the percentage of students who have used the courses, the most popular educational platforms among Polish students, the percentage of people who did not complete a course, and the reasons for failure. Students who had completed any MOOC were also asked about their experiences and the usefulness of the course.

Suggested Citation

  • Geryk Marcin, 2024. "MOOC awareness and utilization among students of selected Polish universities," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 60(1), pages 27-43, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ijcoma:v:60:y:2024:i:1:p:27-43:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/ijcm-2023-0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcm-2023-0019
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ijcm-2023-0019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brent J. Evans & Rachel B. Baker & Thomas S. Dee, 2016. "Persistence Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 87(2), pages 206-242, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damgaard, Mette Trier & Nielsen, Helena Skyt, 2018. "Nudging in education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 313-342.
    2. Baker, Rachel & Dee, Thomas & Evans, Brent & John, June, 2022. "Bias in online classes: Evidence from a field experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Rachel Baker & Brent Evans & Qiujie Li & Bianca Cung, 2019. "Does Inducing Students to Schedule Lecture Watching in Online Classes Improve Their Academic Performance? An Experimental Analysis of a Time Management Intervention," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(4), pages 521-552, June.
    4. Christian M. Stracke & Giada Trisolini, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review on the Quality of MOOCs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ijcoma:v:60:y:2024:i:1:p:27-43:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.