IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eurcou/v8y2016i2p160-174n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Stakeholders in Slovakia Ready for Community-Led Local Development? Case Study Findings

Author

Listed:
  • Bumbalová Monika
  • Valach Martin

    (Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. Andreja Hlinku 2, 949 74 Nitra, Slovakia)

  • Takáč Ivan
  • Tvrdoňová Jela

    (The European Network for Rural Development - Evaluation Helpdesk,Boulevard Saint Michel 77-79, B-1040 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

In the EU new programming period 2014-2020 the Leader approach become part of community-led local development (CLLD). Under Slovak conditions, partnerships, which intend to get the legal status of local action group (LAG), are currently in the process of preparing and formulating their CLLD Strategies. Leader approach is characterised by 7 principles, which should be horizontally presented throughout the implementation process. The multilevel governance presented in the implementation of Leader approach includes the management and implementation of rural development programme, through which the Leader is implemented, as well as, formation of LAGs, as the mediators of the approach at local level. Both levels may have supporting or constraining effects on the application of Leader principles in the Leader delivery. The paper focuses on analysing the differences between theory and practice in the conditions of the Slovak Republic when answering the evaluation question: Are stakeholders in Slovakia ready for community led local development? To answer the question, six LAGs were assessed using the focus group as the assessment tool. Representatives of the national authorities were interviewed in order to complete the picture of the evaluated topic. The study pointed out several shortcomings in basic preconditions allowing smooth application of the CLLD.

Suggested Citation

  • Bumbalová Monika & Valach Martin & Takáč Ivan & Tvrdoňová Jela, 2016. "Are Stakeholders in Slovakia Ready for Community-Led Local Development? Case Study Findings," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 160-174, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:160-174:n:8
    DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2016-0013
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/euco-2016-0013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dax, Thomas & Oedl-Wieser, Theresia, 2016. "Rural innovation activities as a means for changing development perspectives – An assessment of more than two decades of promoting LEADER initiatives across the European Union," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(1), pages 1-8, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mercedes Rodriguez & Luis Miguel Sanchez & Eugenio Cejudo & Jose Antonio Camacho, 2019. "Variety in local development strategies and employment: LEADER programme in Andalusia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(1), pages 43-50.
    2. Franziska Lengerer & Tialda Haartsen & Annett Steinführer, 2023. "Exploring Justice in the Process of Redesigning Local Development Strategies for LEADER: Representation, Distribution, and Recognition," World, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Enabling Factors for Better Multiplier Effects of the LEADER Programme: Lessons from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Nazgul Esengulova & Massimo Manrico Carella & Antonio Lopolito, 2023. "Stakeholder Empowerment in Sustainable Rural Development Partnerships: Two Case Studies from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Marielle Berriet-Solliec & Abdoul Diallo & Cédric Gendre & Vincent Larmet & Denis Lépicier & Lionel Védrine, 2022. "The National Rural Development Programme in France: How Does It Contribute to the Attractiveness of Regions?," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 534-35, pages 83-101.
    6. Navarro Francisco & Labianca Marilena & Cejudo Eugenio & de Rubertis Stefano & Salento Angelo & Maroto Juan Carlos & Belliggiano Angelo, 2018. "Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 107-126, March.
    7. Łukasz Satoła & Anna Milewska, 2022. "The Concept of a Smart Village as an Innovative Way of Implementing Public Tasks in the Era of Instability on the Energy Market—Examples from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Székely, Vladimír & Novotný, Ján, 2019. "Geographical context of the registered LEADER Local Action Groups in Slovakia (EU 2014-2020 programming period)," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 309059, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    9. Ivana Bassi & Matteo Carzedda & Luca Iseppi, 2022. "Innovative Local Development Initiatives in the Eastern Alps: Forest Therapy, Land Consolidation Associations and Mountaineering Villages," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Székely, Vladimír & Novotný, Ján, 2019. "Geographical context of the registered LEADER Local Action Groups in Slovakia (EU 2014-2020 programming period)," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 16.
    11. Konečný Ondřej, 2019. "The Leader Approach Across The European Union: One Method of Rural Development, Many Forms of Implementation," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Oedl-Wieser, Theresia & Dax, Thomas & Fischer, Michael, 2017. "A new approach for participative rural development in Georgia – reflecting transfer of knowledge and enhancing innovation in a non-European Union context," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 119(1), April.
    13. So Young Lee & José M. Díaz-Puente & Pablo Vidueira, 2020. "Enhancing Rural Innovation and Sustainability Through Impact Assessment: A Review of Methods and Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-26, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:160-174:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.