IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/enviro/v4y2016i2p9-16n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A socio-economic evaluation of a protected area - A case study: Hamadan province, Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Moradpanah Haniyeh

    (Islamic Azad University, Lahijan Branch, Lahijan, Iran)

  • Dargahi Mohammad Dehdar

    (Department of Environment, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan Branch, Lahijan, Iran)

  • Limaei Soleiman Mohammadi

    (Deptartment of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Sowmeh Sara, Iran)

  • Moradpanah Monireh

    (Faculty of Environment and Energy, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the socio-economic issues of a protected area and participation of the local stakeholders in conservation of the protected area. This study was conducted at 7 villages in Hamedan province in the midwest part of Iran. A questionnaire was used for data collection. Reliability of the data was determined by Cronbach's alpha. In order to investigate the relationship between the average incomes of different villages, a t-statistic test was used. Results indicated that at the 0.05 significance level, there were significant differences between most villages. Furthermore, the results indicated that there was no significant relationship between mean income of Jara and Saadat Abad villages. In order to investigate the interest for the preservation of different villages, a t-statistic test was used. Results indicated that at the 0.05 significance level of, there were significant differences between Shademaneh and Maloosan, Siyah Dare and Gheshlagh Najaf, Shademaneh and Taemeh, Taemeh and Gheshlagh Najaf villages. Results also showed that the Maloosan village has the highest income in the area and willingness to participate in conservation activities was highest at this village. The results of this study show a new approach to the protection of biodiversity of protected areas with connection to economic, biological and humanistic studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Moradpanah Haniyeh & Dargahi Mohammad Dehdar & Limaei Soleiman Mohammadi & Moradpanah Monireh, 2016. "A socio-economic evaluation of a protected area - A case study: Hamadan province, Iran," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 9-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:enviro:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:9-16:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/environ-2016-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/environ-2016-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/environ-2016-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Campbell, Stuart J. & Kartawijaya, Tasrif & Yulianto, Irfan & Prasetia, Rian & Clifton, Julian, 2013. "Co-management approaches and incentives improve management effectiveness in the Karimunjawa National Park, Indonesia," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 72-79.
    2. Mutenje, M.J. & Ortmann, G.F. & Ferrer, S.R.D., 2011. "Management of non-timber forestry products extraction: Local institutions, ecological knowledge and market structure in South-Eastern Zimbabwe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 454-461, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baiyegunhi, L.J.S. & Oppong, B.B., 2016. "Commercialisation of mopane worm (Imbrasia belina) in rural households in Limpopo Province, South Africa," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 141-148.
    2. Imran, Sophia & Alam, Khorshed & Beaumont, Narelle, 2014. "Environmental orientations and environmental behaviour: Perceptions of protected area tourism stakeholders," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 290-299.
    3. Jay Mar D. Quevedo & Yuta Uchiyama & Kevin Muhamad Lukman & Ryo Kohsaka, 2020. "How Blue Carbon Ecosystems Are Perceived by Local Communities in the Coral Triangle: Comparative and Empirical Examinations in the Philippines and Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Zhu, Hongge & Hu, Shilei & Ren, Yue & Ma, Xing & Cao, Yukun, 2017. "Determinants of engagement in non-timber forest products (NTFPs) business activities: A study on worker households in the forest areas of Daxinganling and Xiaoxinganling Mountains, northeastern China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 125-132.
    5. Engel, Mônica Tais & Marchini, Silvio & Pont, Ana Carolina & Machado, Rodrigo & Oliveira, Larissa Rosa de, 2014. "Perceptions and attitudes of stakeholders towards the wildlife refuge of Ilha dos Lobos, a marine protected area in Brazil," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 45-51.
    6. Steven M. Smith, 2016. "Common Property Resources and New Entrants: Uncovering the Bias and Effects of New Users," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-36.
    7. Kimengsi, Jude Ndzifon & Owusu, Raphael & Djenontin, Ida N.S. & Pretzsch, Jürgen & Giessen, Lukas & Buchenrieder, Gertrud & Pouliot, Mariève & Acosta, Ana Nicole, 2022. "What do we (not) know on forest management institutions in sub-Saharan Africa? A regional comparative review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    8. Gugissa, Desalegn A. & Ingenbleek, Paul T.M. & van Trijp, Hans C.M., 2021. "Market knowledge as a driver of sustainable use of common-pool resources: A lab-in-the-field study among pastoralists in Ethiopia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    9. Ruonan Fang & Juan Zhang & Kangning Xiong & Kyung-Sik Woo & Ning Zhang, 2021. "Influencing Factors of Residents’ Perception of Responsibilities for Heritage Conservation in World Heritage Buffer Zone: A Case Study of Libo Karst," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Tshidzumba, Ratsodo Phillip & Chirwa, Paxie Wanangwa, 2022. "Forest-based land reform partnerships in rural development and the sustenance of timber markets. Learning from two South African cases," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. Soliku, Ophelia & Schraml, Ulrich, 2020. "Protected areas management: A comparison of perceived outcomes associated with different co-management types," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Toshiya Matsuura & Ken Sugimura & Asako Miyamoto & Nobuhiko Tanaka, 2013. "Knowledge-Based Estimation of Edible Fern Harvesting Sites in Mountainous Communities of Northeastern Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Liu, Shilei & Xu, Jintao, 2019. "Livelihood mushroomed: Examining household level impacts of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) under new management regime in China's state forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 44-53.
    14. Brewer, T.D. & Moon, K., 2015. "Towards a functional typology of small-scale fisheries co-management informed by stakeholder perceptions: A coral reef case study," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 48-56.
    15. Phanith Chou, 2019. "The utilization and institutional management of non-timber forest products in Phnom Prich Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1947-1962, August.
    16. Steele, Melita Z. & Shackleton, Charlie M. & Uma Shaanker, R. & Ganeshaiah, K.N. & Radloff, Sarah, 2015. "The influence of livelihood dependency, local ecological knowledge and market proximity on the ecological impacts of harvesting non-timber forest products," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 285-291.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:enviro:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:9-16:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.