IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2020i1p127-d468081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Blue Carbon Ecosystems Are Perceived by Local Communities in the Coral Triangle: Comparative and Empirical Examinations in the Philippines and Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Jay Mar D. Quevedo

    (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Tohoku University, Sendai City 980-8572, Japan)

  • Yuta Uchiyama

    (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Nagoya City 464-8601, Japan)

  • Kevin Muhamad Lukman

    (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Tohoku University, Sendai City 980-8572, Japan)

  • Ryo Kohsaka

    (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Nagoya City 464-8601, Japan)

Abstract

Blue carbon ecosystem (BCE) initiatives in the Coral Triangle Region (CTR) are increasing due to their amplified recognition in mitigating global climate change. Although transdisciplinary approaches in the “blue carbon” discourse and collaborative actions are gaining momentum in the international and national arenas, more work is still needed at the local level. The study pursues how BCE initiatives permeate through the local communities in the Philippines and Indonesia, as part of CTR. Using perception surveys, the coastal residents from Busuanga, Philippines, and Karimunjawa, Indonesia were interviewed on their awareness, utilization, perceived threats, and management strategies for BCEs. Potential factors affecting residents’ perceptions were explored using multivariate regression and correlation analyses. Also, a comparative analysis was done to determine distinctions and commonalities in perceptions as influenced by site-specific scenarios. Results show that, despite respondents presenting relatively high awareness of BCE services, levels of utilization are low with 42.9–92.9% and 23.4–85.1% respondents in Busuanga and Karimunjawa, respectively, not directly utilizing BCE resources. Regression analysis showed that respondents’ occupation significantly influenced their utilization rate and observed opposite correlations in Busuanga (positive) and Karimunjawa (negative). Perceived threats are found to be driven by personal experiences—occurrence of natural disasters in Busuanga whereas discerned anthropogenic activities (i.e., land-use conversion) in Karimunjawa. Meanwhile, recognized management strategies are influenced by the strong presence of relevant agencies like non-government and people’s organizations in Busuanga and the local government in Karimunjawa. These results can be translated as useful metrics in contextualizing and/or enhancing BCE management plans specifically in strategizing advocacy campaigns and engagement of local stakeholders across the CTR.

Suggested Citation

  • Jay Mar D. Quevedo & Yuta Uchiyama & Kevin Muhamad Lukman & Ryo Kohsaka, 2020. "How Blue Carbon Ecosystems Are Perceived by Local Communities in the Coral Triangle: Comparative and Empirical Examinations in the Philippines and Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:127-:d:468081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/127/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/127/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nibedita Mukherjee & Jean Huge & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas & Nico Koedam, 2014. "Ecosystem service valuations of mangrove ecosystems to inform decision making and future valuation exercises," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/217963, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Ehara, Makoto & Hyakumura, Kimihiko & Sato, Ren'ya & Kurosawa, Kiyoshi & Araya, Kunio & Sokh, Heng & Kohsaka, Ryo, 2018. "Addressing Maladaptive Coping Strategies of Local Communities to Changes in Ecosystem Service Provisions Using the DPSIR Framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 226-238.
    3. Carlos M. Duarte & Iñigo J. Losada & Iris E. Hendriks & Inés Mazarrasa & Núria Marbà, 2013. "The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(11), pages 961-968, November.
    4. Campbell, Stuart J. & Kartawijaya, Tasrif & Yulianto, Irfan & Prasetia, Rian & Clifton, Julian, 2013. "Co-management approaches and incentives improve management effectiveness in the Karimunjawa National Park, Indonesia," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 72-79.
    5. Richard Tingem Munang & Ibrahim Thiaw & Mike Rivington, 2011. "Ecosystem Management: Tomorrow’s Approach to Enhancing Food Security under a Changing Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(7), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Ryo Kohsaka & Hikaru Matsuoka, 2015. "Analysis of Japanese Municipalities With Geopark, MAB, and GIAHS Certification," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, November.
    7. Nibedita Mukherjee & William J Sutherland & Lynn Dicks & Jean Hugé & Nico Koedam & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, 2014. "Ecosystem Service Valuations of Mangrove Ecosystems to Inform Decision Making and Future Valuation Exercises," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-9, September.
    8. Thompson, Benjamin S. & Primavera, Jurgenne H. & Friess, Daniel A., 2017. "Governance and implementation challenges for mangrove forest Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Empirical evidence from the Philippines," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 146-155.
    9. Daniel Murdiyarso & Joko Purbopuspito & J. Boone Kauffman & Matthew W. Warren & Sigit D. Sasmito & Daniel C. Donato & Solichin Manuri & Haruni Krisnawati & Sartji Taberima & Sofyan Kurnianto, 2015. "The potential of Indonesian mangrove forests for global climate change mitigation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1089-1092, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diana Harding & Kevin Muhamad Lukman & Matheus Jingga & Yuta Uchiyama & Jay Mar D. Quevedo & Ryo Kohsaka, 2022. "Urban Gardening and Wellbeing in Pandemic Era: Preliminary Results from a Socio-Environmental Factors Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Ryo Kohsaka & Yuta Uchiyama, 2021. "Special Issue: “Urban Agriculture, Forestry and Green-Blue Infrastructure as “Re-Discovered Commons”: Bridging Urban-Rural Interface”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-5, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tanner, Michael K. & Moity, Nicolas & Costa, Matthew T. & Marin Jarrin, Jose R. & Aburto-Oropeza, Octavio & Salinas-de-León, Pelayo, 2019. "Mangroves in the Galapagos: Ecosystem services and their valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 12-24.
    2. Md. Hafiz Iqbal & Md. Elias Hossain, 2023. "Tourists’ willingness to pay for restoration of Sundarbans Mangrove forest ecosystems: a contingent valuation modeling study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2443-2464, March.
    3. Park, Mi Sun & Shin, Seongmin & Lee, Haeun, 2021. "Media frames on urban greening in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    4. Das, Saudamini, 2017. "Ecological Restoration and Livelihood: Contribution of Planted Mangroves as Nursery and Habitat for Artisanal and Commercial Fishery," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 492-502.
    5. Shrestha, Kripa & Shakya, Bandana & Adhikari, Biraj & Nepal, Mani & Shaoliang, Yi, 2023. "Ecosystem services valuation for conservation and development decisions: A review of valuation studies and tools in the Far Eastern Himalaya," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    6. Juanita Aldana-Domínguez & Carlos Montes & José A. González, 2018. "Understanding the Past to Envision a Sustainable Future: A Social–Ecological History of the Barranquilla Metropolitan Area (Colombia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Jean Hugé & Behara Satyanarayana & Nibedita Mukherjee & Viviana Otero & Katherine Vande Velde & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, 2023. "Mapping research gaps for sustainable forest management based on the nominal group technique," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 10101-10121, September.
    8. Villanueva, Anastasio J. & Vernaza-Quiñónez, Lucía & Granado-Díaz, Rubén, 2023. "Disentangling the heterogeneity of mangrove managers' perception of ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Farrell, Katharine N. & Löw Beer, David, 2019. "Producing the ecological economy: A study in developing fiduciary principles supporting the application of flow-fund consistent investment criteria for sovereign wealth funds," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Baraka P. Nyangoko & Håkan Berg & Mwita M. Mangora & Martin Gullström & Mwanahija S. Shalli, 2020. "Community Perceptions of Mangrove Ecosystem Services and Their Determinants in the Rufiji Delta, Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. repec:eee:ecoser:v:37:y:2019:i:c:p:- is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Amina Juma Hamza & Luciana S. Esteves & Marin Cvitanović, 2022. "Changes in Mangrove Cover and Exposure to Coastal Hazards in Kenya," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    13. Samyuktha Ashokkumar & Zareena Begum Irfan, 2018. "Current Status of Mangroves in India: Benefits, Rising Threats Policy and Suggestions for the Way Forward," Working Papers 2018-174, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    14. Novia Arinda Pradisty & Frida Sidik & Yuntha Bimantara & Ipanna Enggar Susetya & Mohammad Basyuni, 2022. "Litterfall and Associated Macrozoobenthic of Restored Mangrove Forests in Abandoned Aquaculture Ponds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Hugé, J. & Rochette, A.J. & de Béthune, S. & Parra Paitan, C.C. & Vanderhaegen, K. & Vandervelden, T. & Van Passel, S. & Vanhove, M.P.M. & Verbist, B. & Verheyen, D. & Waas, T. & Janssens, I. & Jans, 2020. "Ecosystem services assessment tools for African Biosphere Reserves: A review and user-informed classification," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    16. Valerie Hagger & Thomas A. Worthington & Catherine E. Lovelock & Maria Fernanda Adame & Tatsuya Amano & Benjamin M. Brown & Daniel A. Friess & Emily Landis & Peter J. Mumby & Tiffany H. Morrison & Kat, 2022. "Drivers of global mangrove loss and gain in social-ecological systems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Vasilis C. Kapsalis & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Konstantinos G. Aravossis, 2019. "Investigation of Ecosystem Services and Circular Economy Interactions under an Inter-organizational Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, May.
    18. Sohma, Akio & Shibuki, Hisashi & Nakajima, Fumiyuki & Kubo, Atsushi & Kuwae, Tomohiro, 2018. "Modeling a coastal ecosystem to estimate climate change mitigation and a model demonstration in Tokyo Bay," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 261-289.
    19. Alexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor & Walid Hamma & Huu Duy Nguyen & Giovanni Randazzo & Anselme Muzirafuti & Mari-Isabella Stan & Van Truong Tran & Roxana Aştefănoaiei & Quang-Thanh Bui & Dragoş-Florian Vintilă, 2020. "Degradation of Coastlines under the Pressure of Urbanization and Tourism: Evidence on the Change of Land Systems from Europe, Asia and Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-43, August.
    20. Aleksandar Valjarević & Jasmina Petrović & Olivera Marković-Savić & Dejan Filipović & Dušan Ristić & Dragan Radovanović & Marijana Azdejković, 2020. "Roma Inner Migration Tradition Between Social Inclusion and the Protection of Natural Resources," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    21. Chi, Yuan & Liu, Dahai & Wang, Jing & Wang, Enkang, 2020. "Human negative, positive, and net influences on an estuarine area with intensive human activity based on land covers and ecological indices: An empirical study in Chongming Island, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:127-:d:468081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.