IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecobur/v7y2021i1p26-46n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Repeated weighting in mixed-mode censuses

Author

Listed:
  • Szymkowiak Marcin

    (Poznań University of Economics and Business, Institute of Informatics and Quantitative Economics, Department of Statistics, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875Poznań, Poland, Statistical Office in Poznań, Wojska Polskiego 27/29, 60-624Poznań)

  • Wilak Kamil

    (Poznań University of Economics and Business, Institute of Informatics and Quantitative Economics, Department of Statistics, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875Poznań, Poland, Statistical Office in Poznań, Wojska Polskiego 27/29, 60-624Poznań)

Abstract

The main aim of the paper is to use the repeated weighting (RW) method on data from the National Census of Population and Housing 2011 (NCPH) and Labour Force Survey (LFS) to ensure consistency between margins of final tables derived from different statistical sources. This technique, based on different data sources, would ensure consistency between estimates in final output tables. This is the first application of the RW approach on data from official statistics in Poland. The results obtained by applying the RW method to data from the NCPH and additional surveys (e.g. LFS) may be used by Statistics Poland for the formulation of conclusions and recommendations for the upcoming census in 2021. The method may be also considered as an important step towards the production of timely and more detailed statistical information in Poland based on multi-source data infrastructure in general4.

Suggested Citation

  • Szymkowiak Marcin & Wilak Kamil, 2021. "Repeated weighting in mixed-mode censuses," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 26-46, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecobur:v:7:y:2021:i:1:p:26-46:n:6
    DOI: 10.18559/ebr.2021.1.3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2021.1.3
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18559/ebr.2021.1.3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kott, Phillip S. & Chang, Ted, 2010. "Using Calibration Weighting to Adjust for Nonignorable Unit Nonresponse," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(491), pages 1265-1275.
    2. Ton de Waal & Arnout van Delden & Sander Scholtus, 2020. "Multi‐source Statistics: Basic Situations and Methods," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 203-228, April.
    3. Changbao Wu & Wilson W. Lu, 2016. "Calibration Weighting Methods for Complex Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 79-98, April.
    4. Ray Chambers & Andrea Diniz da Silva, 2020. "Improved secondary analysis of linked data: a framework and an illustration," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(1), pages 37-59, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shixiao Zhang & Peisong Han & Changbao Wu, 2023. "Calibration Techniques Encompassing Survey Sampling, Missing Data Analysis and Causal Inference," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(2), pages 165-192, August.
    2. James Chipperfield, 2022. "Survey Weighting after Imperfect Linkage to an Administrative File," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(3), pages 419-436, December.
    3. Camboni, Riccardo & Corsini, Alberto & Miniaci, Raffaele & Valbonesi, Paola, 2021. "Mapping fuel poverty risk at the municipal level. A small-scale analysis of Italian Energy Performance Certificate, census and survey data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Denis Devaud & Yves Tillé, 2019. "Deville and Särndal’s calibration: revisiting a 25-years-old successful optimization problem," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1033-1065, December.
    5. Kott Phillip S. & Liao Dan, 2018. "Calibration Weighting for Nonresponse with Proxy Frame Variables (So that Unit Nonresponse Can Be Not Missing at Random)," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 34(1), pages 107-120, March.
    6. Yujing Shao & Lei Wang, 2022. "Generalized partial linear models with nonignorable dropouts," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 223-252, February.
    7. M. Giovanna Ranalli & Alina Matei & Andrea Neri, 2023. "Generalised calibration with latent variables for the treatment of unit nonresponse in sample surveys," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 169-195, March.
    8. Rong Tang & Yun Yang, 2022. "Bayesian inference for risk minimization via exponentially tilted empirical likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1257-1286, September.
    9. Giovanni D'Alessio & Andrea Neri, 2015. "Income and wealth sample estimates consistent with macro aggregates: some experiments," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 272, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    10. Jiwei Zhao & Jun Shao, 2015. "Semiparametric Pseudo-Likelihoods in Generalized Linear Models With Nonignorable Missing Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1577-1590, December.
    11. Guo, Xu & Song, Lianlian & Fang, Yun & Zhu, Lixing, 2019. "Model checking for general linear regression with nonignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-12.
    12. María del Mar García Rueda & Pier Francesco Perri & Beatriz Rodríguez Cobo, 2018. "Advances in estimation by the item sum technique using auxiliary information in complex surveys," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(3), pages 455-478, July.
    13. Särndal Carl-Erik & Traat Imbi & Lumiste Kaur, 2018. "Interaction Between Data Collection And Estimation Phases In Surveys With Nonresponse," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 19(2), pages 183-200, June.
    14. Wang, Lei & Zhao, Puying & Shao, Jun, 2021. "Dimension-reduced semiparametric estimation of distribution functions and quantiles with nonignorable nonresponse," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Roberta Varriale & Marco Alfo’, 2023. "Multi-source statistics on employment status in Italy, a machine learning approach," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 81(1), pages 37-63, April.
    16. Hamori, Shigeyuki & Motegi, Kaiji & Zhang, Zheng, 2019. "Calibration estimation of semiparametric copula models with data missing at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 85-109.
    17. Tang, Cheng Yong, 2024. "A model specification test for semiparametric nonignorable missing data modeling," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 124-132.
    18. Changbao Wu & Wilson W. Lu, 2016. "Calibration Weighting Methods for Complex Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 79-98, April.
    19. Laaksonen Seppo & Hämäläinen Auli, 2018. "Joint Response Propensity And Calibration Method," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 19(1), pages 45-60, March.
    20. Jierui Du & Xia Cui, 2024. "Semiparametric estimation in generalized additive partial linear models with nonignorable nonresponse data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(5), pages 3235-3259, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    repeated weighting method; calibration; Generalised Regression Estimator; data linkage; National Census of Population and Housing 2011; Labour Force Survey;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecobur:v:7:y:2021:i:1:p:26-46:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.