IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ceuecj/v12y2025i59p120-137n1008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possibilities of Using Decision Support Systems for Agriculture in Areas with High Agrarian Fragmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Kramarz Paulina

    (Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Institute of Economics and Finances, Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The capabilities of farms often limit the possibility of using technologically advanced agricultural digital solutions. However, the experience of many countries shows that several easily accessible digital solutions can bring results in the form of optimising agricultural production processes. Hence, the research aimed to recognise the usefulness of digital solutions for systems supporting decision-making in farms operating in areas with sizeable agrarian fragmentation and to determine the barriers to their implementation. In order to achieve the research objective, the survey questionnaire method was used—389 farms from the Małopolskie and Podkarpackie voivodeships (areas with the most significant scale of agrarian fragmentation in Poland) were examined. The study showed that 34% of the surveyed farms used at least one technology that can be classified as a decision-support system. Financial constraints, insufficient equipment, and insufficient IT knowledge were indicated as the most critical barriers to their use. From the perspective of the surveyed farms, the functions of the systems above considered to be the most useful were the possibility of estimating resource consumption, the possibility of receiving information on the occurrence of the risk of plant diseases and access to an accurate weather forecast for individual agricultural plots. It is worth noting that respondents noticed the usefulness of the systems mentioned above in the remote exchange of information.

Suggested Citation

  • Kramarz Paulina, 2025. "Possibilities of Using Decision Support Systems for Agriculture in Areas with High Agrarian Fragmentation," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 12(59), pages 120-137.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ceuecj:v:12:y:2025:i:59:p:120-137:n:1008
    DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2025-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2025-0008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ceej-2025-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Bournaris & Jason Papathanasiou, 2012. "A DSS for planning the agricultural production," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 117-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anat Goldstein & Lior Fink & Gilad Ravid, 2021. "A Framework for Evaluating Agricultural Ontologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Reidsma, Pytrik & Janssen, Sander & Jansen, Jacques & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2018. "On the development and use of farm models for policy impact assessment in the European Union – A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 111-125.
    3. Dimitrios Iakovidis & Yiorgos Gadanakis & Julian Park, 2023. "Farmer and Adviser Perspectives on Business Planning and Control in Mediterranean Agriculture: Evidence from Argolida, Greece," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Chatzinikolaou, Parthena & Manos, Basil D. & Kiomourtzi, Fedra, 2014. "Assessment of Sustainable Production in rural areas," 2014 Third Congress, June 25-27, 2014, Alghero, Italy 173105, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agriculture; agrarian fragmentation; small-scale farms; decision support systems;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q16 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - R&D; Agricultural Technology; Biofuels; Agricultural Extension Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ceuecj:v:12:y:2025:i:59:p:120-137:n:1008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.