IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/bjeust/v12y2022i1p79-98n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence, Value Alignment and Rationality

Author

Listed:
  • Bekenova Zhumagul

    (Department of Philosophy and Political Science, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi 71, Almaty, 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Müürsepp Peeter

    (Department of Philosophy and Political Science, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Department of Law, Tallinn University of Technology, Akadeemia tee 3, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia)

  • Nurysheva Gulzhikhan
  • Turarbekova Laura

    (Department of Philosophy and Political Science, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi 71, Almaty, 050040, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

The problem of value alignment in the context of AI studies is becoming more and more acute. This article deals with the basic questions concerning the system of human values corresponding to what we would like digital minds to be capable of. It has been suggested that as long as humans cannot agree on a universal system of values in the positive sense, we might be able to agree on what has to be avoided. The article argues that while we may follow this suggestion, we still need to keep the positive approach in focus as well. A holistic solution to the value alignment problem is not in sight and there might possibly never be a final solution. Currently, we are facing an era of endless adjustment of digital minds to biological ones. The biggest challenge is to keep humans in control of this adjustment. Here the responsibility lies with the humans. Human minds might not be able to fix the capacity of digital minds. The philosophical analysis shows that the key concept when dealing with this issue is value plurality. It may well be that we have to redefine our understanding of rationality in order to successfully deal with the value alignment problem. The article discusses an option to elaborate on the traditional understanding of rationality in the context of AI studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Bekenova Zhumagul & Müürsepp Peeter & Nurysheva Gulzhikhan & Turarbekova Laura, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence, Value Alignment and Rationality," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 79-98, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:79-98:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/bjes-2022-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2022-0004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bjes-2022-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Bostrom, 2019. "The Vulnerable World Hypothesis," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(4), pages 455-476, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Neufville, Robert & Baum, Seth D., 2021. "Collective action on artificial intelligence: A primer and review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Gabel Taggart, 2023. "Taking stock of systems for organizing existential and global catastrophic risks: Implications for policy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(3), pages 489-499, June.
    3. Kira J. Cooper & Robert B. Gibson, 2022. "A Novel Framework for Inner-Outer Sustainability Assessment," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Tom Hobson & Olaf Corry, 2023. "Existential security: Safeguarding humanity or globalising power?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(4), pages 633-637, September.
    5. Rasmus Karlsson, 2021. "Learning in the Anthropocene," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, June.
    6. Nathan Alexander Sears, 2020. "Existential Security: Towards a Security Framework for the Survival of Humanity," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(2), pages 255-266, April.
    7. Ludmila Кondratska & Liudmila Romanovska & Tetiana Kravchyna & Nataliia Korolova & Kateryna Oliynyk, 2021. "Bioethics as an Anthropological Challenge," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(3Sup1), pages 61-75, September.
    8. Ionel Elena-Simona & Miron Alexandra-Dorina, 2023. "Bullwhip Effect Demand Variation and Amplification within Supply Chains," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 246-253, July.
    9. Matthew Rendall, 2022. "Nuclear war as a predictable surprise," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(5), pages 782-791, November.
    10. Christopher Nathan & Keith Hyams, 2022. "Global policymakers and catastrophic risk," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 3-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:79-98:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.