IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v12y2021i6p20-32.html

The impact of ESG reporting on the financial performance of Russian public companies

Author

Listed:
  • Bela S. Bataeva

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia)

  • Aglaya D. Kokurina

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia)

  • Nikita A. Karpov

    (Benchmark Executive, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

There is a growing interest in non-financial reporting of public companies, which includes environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors. The paper studies how the degree of ESG disclosure affects corporate performance in Russia. Methodologically, the study relies on the concept of corporate sustainability and stakeholders, according to which ESG reporting increases investors and customers’ confidence in the company and thereby contributes to the growth of profit-based indicators. Among the research methods applied are descriptive, correlation and regression analysis of the relationship between ESG disclosure and return on assets (ROA), equity (ROE) and capital (ROC) of public companies. The sample includes 50 Russian companies whose shares were traded on the Moscow Exchange between 2010 and 2019. The research demonstrates that ESG reporting has a statistically significant positive impact on the financial performance of the companies under review. The degree of this influence is different according to the enterprise’s industry, size and debt level. Moreover, even in similar companies the impact depends on the level of ESG disclosure. The obtained results are of interest primarily to lenders, since the study focuses on financial profit-based indicators, while investors, in addition to traditional analysis, also use value analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Bela S. Bataeva & Aglaya D. Kokurina & Nikita A. Karpov, 2021. "The impact of ESG reporting on the financial performance of Russian public companies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 20-32, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:12:y:2021:i:6:p:20-32
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-6-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/94/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2021/909
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-6-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrey B. Ankudinov & Idelia R. Badykova, 2020. "Empirical analysis of the relationship between the costs of corporate social responsibility policy implementation and Russian companies’ financial performance," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 16-26, April.
    2. Elena A. Fedorova & Lyudmila K. Shiryaeva & Lyubov E. Khrustova & Igor S. Demin & Svetlana V. Ledyaeva, 2020. "Disclosure of environmental information in corporate reports and investment attractiveness of Russian companies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(5), pages 29-46, November.
    3. Archie B. Carroll, 2016. "Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Bela S. BATAEVA, 2018. "Stakeholder Engagement: The Case of the Russian Largest Oil and Gas Companies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 20-27, August.
    5. Güler Aras & Aslı Aybars & Ozlem Kutlu, 2010. "Managing corporate performance," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(3), pages 229-254, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna I. Izgarova & Elena M. Rogova & Olga V. Bakhareva, 2023. "ESG investment relationship with financial performance of Russian companies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 14(3), pages 17-29, July.
    2. Pavel A. Mikhnenko, 2023. "Multimodal business analytics: The concept and its application prospects in economic science and practice," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 14(6), pages 2-18, December.
    3. Irina S. Belik & Anton S. Dutsinin & Natalia L. Nikulina, 2022. "Financial state and investment attractiveness of Russian public companies: The effect of ESG factors," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 13(6), pages 44-55, January.
    4. M. V. Sigova, 2025. "Socially Responsible Investment and Social Inclusion of Russian Companies," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 5, pages 59-75, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandra ZBUCHEA & Florina PÎNZARU, 2017. "Tailoring CSR Strategy to Company Size?," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(3), pages 415-437, September.
    2. Marie-Pier CÔTÉ & Doina MURESANU, 2024. "A Cross Look At The Organization'S Commitment To Social Responsibility. Case Of A Mining Company In Quebec, Canada," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 33(2), pages 252-262, December.
    3. Priyanka Aggarwal & Archana Singh & Deepali Malhotra, 2025. "ESG Implementation in Indian NIFTY 500 Companies: A Comprehensive Multi-case Analysis of Strategy, Implementation, and Value Creation," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 14(3), pages 243-260, December.
    4. Luger, Michaela & Hofer, Katharina Maria & Floh, Arne, 2022. "Support for corporate social responsibility among generation Y consumers in advanced versus emerging markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2).
    5. Hildegunn Mellesmo Aslaksen & Clare Hildebrandt & Hans Chr. Garmann Johnsen, 2021. "The long-term transformation of the concept of CSR: towards a more comprehensive emphasis on sustainability," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Ling Gao & Ghulam Rasool Madni, 2025. "Utility of Z Generation in Context of Corporate Social Responsibility Towards Green Environment," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 12917-12942, September.
    7. Yuefan Sun & Jidong Zhang & Jing Han & Qi Zhang, 2023. "The impact of top management teams' faultlines on organizational transparency―Evidence from CSR initiatives," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 1262-1276, October.
    8. Driss Rahma & Jarboui Anis, 2015. "Contribution of Social Disclosure and Organizational Culture to Create Financial Value of Tunisian Companies," Growth, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 2(1), pages 10-17.
    9. Karishma Ansaram & Neeveditah Pariag-Maraye, 2018. "Modelling the Impact of Responsibility Levels on Corporate Financial Performance: The Case of Top 100 Firms in Mauritius," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(3), pages 118-138, September.
    10. Petya Koleva & Maureen Meadows & Ahmed Elmasry, 2023. "The influence of Islam in shaping organisational socially responsible behaviour," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 1001-1019, July.
    11. Habtie Alemnew Belay & Fentaye Kasaa Hailu & Gedif Tessema Sinshaw, 2024. "Linking employees' work orientation and corporate social responsibility practices: Multilevel and multistakeholder cross‐sectional study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 676-696, January.
    12. Dimitri Petrik & Gero Strobel & Thorsten Schoormann & Frederik Möller & Christoph Hoppe-Ludwig & Virginia Springer, 2026. "Digital product passports," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 36(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Fabrizio Crespi & Milena Migliavacca, 2020. "The Determinants of ESG Rating in the Financial Industry: The Same Old Story or a Different Tale?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Nguyen Huu Anh & Duong Thi Chi, 2025. "Nonlinear Effects of Inflation and Wage Policy on Firm Sustainable Growth in Vietnam," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 250-269.
    15. Saeed, Asif & Hamid, Samreen & Manita, Riadh & Suntraruk, Phassawan, 2025. "CSR decoupling and financial fraud: Unveiling the hidden nexus in US-listed firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    16. Yusheng Kong & Alex Antwi‐Adjei & Jonas Bawuah, 2020. "A systematic review of the business case for corporate social responsibility and firm performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 444-454, March.
    17. Joonhyun Kim & Jinsoo Kim, 2018. "Corporate Sustainability Management and Its Market Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    18. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    19. Ioannis Panagiotopoulos, 2021. "Novel CSR & novel coronavirus: corporate social responsibility inside the frame of coronavirus pandemic in Greece," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Majid Khan & James C. Lockhart & Ralph J. Bathurst, 2018. "Institutional impacts on corporate social responsibility: a comparative analysis of New Zealand and Pakistan," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:12:y:2021:i:6:p:20-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.