IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ura/ecregj/v1y2015i3p204-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitiveness and Economic Security — Priority Problems of the Region’s Metallurgical Complex and its Leaders in the Conditions Of Instability

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey Kozitsyn
  • Margarita Dudinskaya

    (Department of Financial Management, Institute of Higher School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin)

Abstract

The subject-matter of the research is the study of the regional metallurgical complex and its leaders, which account for 55 % of industrial output and more than 57 % of exports of the Sverdlovsk region, in the current terms of economic instability. Supporting the business priorities of improving the competitiveness and economic security of the enterprise is based on the example of "UMMC-Holding" — the leader of ferrous metallurgy in the Middle Urals, an active participant in the global and Russian copper market. The modern economic, mathematical, and general scientific methods (comparison study, the ratio of total and private, and others) are applied as the research methods. To obtain the study results, the main areas of the holding impacted by the sanctions are analyzed: modernization of production and spare parts provisions of the current imported equipment, correction of the supply chain, searching for new business partners, transformation of the structure and direction of cargo traffic, solving transportation problems, stocks system management and minimization of economic, social and environmental costs. The urgency of solving the problem of company competitiveness and economic security increasing together with its sectoral and regional features in the present conditions is proved as the key conclusion. The high competitiveness of the holding is considered to be one of the factors of its economic security. The main goal of the economic security of the company is its sustainable and maximally effective functioning at the present time and high potential for successful development in the future. The indicators and criteria for the economic security evaluation are studied in detail. The analysis conducted has shown that, in general, the holding has high indicators characterizing its economic security on the basis of high competitiveness. As a negative sign, a lack of the investment growth needed to solve urgent problems is noticed.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey Kozitsyn & Margarita Dudinskaya, 2015. "Competitiveness and Economic Security — Priority Problems of the Region’s Metallurgical Complex and its Leaders in the Conditions Of Instability," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 204-215.
    • Handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2015:i:3:p:204-215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2015/September_2015/ERSeptember2015_204_215.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Ulyukaev & V. Mau., 2015. "From Economic Crisis to Economic Growth, or How to Prevent the Crisis from Turning into Stagnation," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 4.
    2. A. Kudrin & E. Gurvich., 2014. "A New Growth Model for the Russian Economy," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olga Romanova & Dmitriy Sirotin, 2017. "The Desired Image of the Future Economy of the Industrial Region: Development Trends and Evaluation Methodology," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 746-763.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lyubimov, I. & Gvozdeva, M. & Kazakova, M. & Nesterova, K., 2017. "Economic Complexity of Russian Regions and their Potential to Diversify," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 94-122.
    2. Buklemishev, O., 2016. "Overcoming Investment Pause in the Russian Economy," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 160-167.
    3. Elena Stupnikova & Tatyana Sukhadolets, 2019. "Construction Sector Role in Gross Fixed Capital Formation: Empirical Data from Russia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Simone Auer & Emidio Cocozza & Andrea COlabella, 2016. "The financial systems in Russia and Turkey: recent developments and challenges," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 358, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    5. Fokin, Nikita, 2021. "The importance of modeling structural breaks in forecasting Russian GDP," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 63, pages 5-29.
    6. Kudrin, A. & Gurvich, E., 2015. "Government Stimulus or Economic Incentives?," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 179-186.
    7. Olga Romanova & Yevgeniy Starikov, 2015. "Changes in the Vector of Industrial Policy and Possibilities for Innovative Development of the Industrial Regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 322-333.
    8. Gontmakher, E., 2015. "Health and Welfare: in Search of Balance of Interests," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 259-264.
    9. Mau, Vladimir & Ulyukaev, Alexey, 2015. "Global crisis and challenges for Russian economic development," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 4-29.
    10. Berezinskaya, Olga, 2017. "Investment drought in the Russian economy: Structural characteristics and turnaround perspectives," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 71-82.
    11. Abramov, Alexander & Radygin, Alexander & Chernova, Maria, 2017. "State-owned enterprises in the Russian market: Ownership structure and their role in the economy," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23.
    12. A. K. Solov’ev, 2022. "Problems of Application of the Substitution Coefficient as a Criterion of Efficiency of the Pension System of Russia," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 176-184, April.
    13. Ketenci, Natalya, 2015. "Capital mobility in Russia," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 386-403.
    14. Dubinin, S., 2015. "Financial Crisis 2014-2015," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 219-225.
    15. A. K. Solovev, 2019. "Insurance Pension Reform: Strategic Challenges and Tactical Risks," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 425-433, July.
    16. Vladimir Alexandrovich Shamakhov & Aleksei Igorevich Balashov, 0. "The New Socio-Political Normality and the Lessons of the Post-Soviet Modernization of Public Administration," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 12.
    17. Klimanov V. V. & Chernyshova N. A. & Nedopivtseva D. A., 2016. "The mechanisms of formation of strategic socio-economic priorities," World of economics and management / Vestnik NSU. Series: Social and Economics Sciences, Socionet, vol. 16(4), pages 80-92.
    18. Polbin, Andrey V. (Полбин, Андрей В.), 2020. "Estimating Time-Varying Long-Run Growth Rate of Russian GDP in the ARX Model with Oil Prices [Оценка Траектории Темпов Трендового Роста Ввп России В Arx-Модели С Ценами На Нефть]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 40-63, February.
    19. V. G. Basareva & N. N. Mikheeva, 2018. "Siberian Federal District: What Impedes Economic Growth?," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 184-192, April.
    20. Gurvich, Evsey, 2016. "Institutional constraints and economic development," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 349-374.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2015:i:3:p:204-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Naydenov (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economyofregion.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.