IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ulp/buopee/v41y2019m12i6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les relations commerciales entre l’Union européenne et la Chine dans le nouveau contexte international : du statut d’économie de marché à la réforme des instruments de défense commerciale

Author

Listed:
  • Damien Broussolle

    (Institut d’Etudes Politiques, Université de Strasbourg (LaRGE),)

Abstract

Le nouveau contexte des relations commerciales internationales que les États-Unis mettent en place sous l’impulsion de D. Trump bouscule des relations UE-Chine marquées par une inquiétude grandissante du côté européen. De fait, la Chine n’est plus un pays en développement (PED), elle occupe une place de plus en plus grande dans le commerce international et la façon de traiter avec elle devient un enjeu fondamental de la politique commerciale extérieure de l’Union européenne (UE). Une politique qui relève pour la plus grande part de la compétence exclusive de l’Union. Confrontée au bouleversement des relations économiques internationales, cette politique doit s’adapter, sans qu’elle ne bénéficie de l’unité de vue, ou de la détermination, que confèrent une souveraineté unifiée de type national ou fédéral

Suggested Citation

  • Damien Broussolle, 2019. "Les relations commerciales entre l’Union européenne et la Chine dans le nouveau contexte international : du statut d’économie de marché à la réforme des instruments de défense commerciale," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 41(1), pages 47-54, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ulp:buopee:v:41:y:2019:m:12:i:6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://opee.unistra.fr/Les-relations-commerciales-entre-l-Union-europeenne-et-la-Chine-dans-le-nouveau
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dani Rodrik, 2018. "What Do Trade Agreements Really Do?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(2), pages 73-90, Spring.
    2. Cecilia Bellora & Sébastien Jean, 2016. "Le statut d’économie de marché de la Chine : un enjeu fort pour le commerce européen," La Lettre du CEPII, CEPII research center, issue 370.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damien Broussolle, 2019. "Les relations commerciales entre l’Union européenne et la Chine dans le nouveau contexte international : du statut d’économie de marché à la réforme des instruments de défense commerciale," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 41(1), pages 47-54, November.
    2. Julia Seiermann, 2018. "Only Words? How Power in Trade Agreement Texts Affects International Trade Flows," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 80, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    3. Simon Hartmann & Thomas Lindner & Jakob Müllner & Jonas Puck, 2022. "Beyond the nation-state: Anchoring supranational institutions in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1282-1306, August.
    4. Prema-chandra Athukorala, 2020. "Free Trade Agreements in the World Trade System: Substance and Semantics," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 55(1), pages 13-20, February.
    5. Franco-Bedoya, Sebastian & Frohm, Erik, 2020. "Global trade in final goods and intermediate inputs: impact of FTAs and reduced “Border Effects”," Working Paper Series 2410, European Central Bank.
    6. Amelie Guillin & Isabelle Rabaud & Chahir Zaki, 2023. "Does the depth of trade agreements matter for trade in services?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(12), pages 3616-3653, December.
    7. Lukaszuk, Piotr & Legge, Stefan, 2019. "Which Factors Determine the Utilization of Preferential Tariff Rates?," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203639, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Yamlaksira S. Getachew & Roger Fon & Elie Chrysostome, 2023. "On the location choices of African multinational enterprises: Do supranational economic institutions matter?," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(4), pages 453-490, December.
    9. Prema-chandra Athukorala & Dayaratna Silva, 2019. "The FTA debate in Sri Lanka: Rhetoric and Reality," ASARC Working Papers 2019-03, The Australian National University, Australia South Asia Research Centre.
    10. Timini, Jacopo, 2020. "Staying dry on Spanish wine: The rejection of the 1905 Spanish-Italian trade agreement," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Stein Masunda & Gabriel Mhonyera, 2024. "Effects of free trade on export efficiency of COMESA member-states," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Colantone, Italo & Ottaviano, Gianmarco & Stanig, Piero, 2021. "The backlash of globalization," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113860, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Ann E. Davis, 2023. "Ukraine War: Policy Miscalculations or Contradictions of Capitalism?," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 557-567, December.
    14. Maryann Feldman & Frederick Guy & Simona Iammarino, 2021. "Regional income disparities, monopoly and finance," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(1), pages 25-49.
    15. Kaleb Abreha & Raymond Robertson, 2023. "Heterogeneous trade agreements and adverse implications of restrictive rules of origin: Evidence from apparel trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(12), pages 3482-3510, December.
    16. Fabien Candau & Geoffroy Guepie & Julie Schlick, 2019. "Moving to autarky, trade creation and home market effect: an exhaustive analysis of regional trade agreements in Africa," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(30), pages 3293-3309, June.
    17. Olney, William W., 2020. "Cabotage sabotage? The curious case of the Jones Act," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. Jakob Engel & Deeksha Kokas & Gladys Lopez-Acevedo & Maryla Maliszewska, 2021. "The Distributional Impacts of Trade," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 35552, August.
    19. Vincent Rebeyrol, 2023. "Protection Without Discrimination," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(655), pages 2807-2827.
    20. Matthias Aistleitner & Stephan Puehringer, 2020. "Exploring the trade (policy) narratives in economic elite discourse," ICAE Working Papers 110, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulp:buopee:v:41:y:2019:m:12:i:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/opstrfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.