The Value of Prominent Directors: Corporate Governance and Bank Access in Transitional Japan
Although observers urge transitional economies to rely on banks rather than stock markets, in early twentieth-century Japan, large firms did not rely on debt. Instead, they sold stock. To mitigate agency slack, they sometimes recruited prominent investors to their boards. In this context, we use data on cotton-spinning firms to explore the relationship between board composition and profitability. First, firms that hired prominent directors had higher profits in succeeding years. We hypothesize that these directors brought monitoring skills and certifying credibility: they knew what to expect, knew when and how to intervene, and had the reputations necessary to certify firm quality credibly. Second, firms did not further increase their profitability by appointing directors with access to a bank or to spinning technology. We conclude that the firms probably had access to funds and technological assistance without board connections. Copyright 2002 by the University of Chicago.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:31:y:2002:i:2:p:273-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.