IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v4y2009i3p263-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should a High School Adopt Advanced Placement or a Concurrent Enrollment Program? An Expected Benefit Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Donald H. Dutkowsky

    () (Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University)

  • Jerry M. Evensky

    () (Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University)

  • Gerald S. Edmonds

    () (Project Advance, Syracuse University)

Abstract

This article provides an explicit framework for evaluating the expected benefit to college-bound students of courses offered by Advanced Placement (AP) versus concurrent enrollment programs (CEP). District personnel can use it to assess the relative merits of these programs, given the characteristics of their students, in deciding which model to implement or maintain. Simulations reveal that CEP generally provides a higher expected benefit for districts where students who take the course attend private colleges or universities (including public institutions out of state) and perform on the AP exam around national norms. AP favors high schools where students taking the course either face inexpensive costs for study at institutions of higher education or perform exceptionally well on the AP exam. Information from a sample of 240 colleges and universities reveals that few explicitly reject AP or CEP for credit if the student meets a minimum criterion, although more information is provided for AP. © 2009 American Education Finance Association

Suggested Citation

  • Donald H. Dutkowsky & Jerry M. Evensky & Gerald S. Edmonds, 2009. "Should a High School Adopt Advanced Placement or a Concurrent Enrollment Program? An Expected Benefit Approach," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 4(3), pages 263-277, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:4:y:2009:i:3:p:263-277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/edfp.2009.4.3.263
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    advanced placement; concurrent enrollment; college-bound student programs;

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:4:y:2009:i:3:p:263-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kristin Waites). General contact details of provider: http://mitpress.mit.edu/journals/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.