IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

National Board Certification for Teachers: What Does It Cost and How Does It Compare?

Listed author(s):
  • Jennifer King Rice


    (Department of Education Policy Studies, University of Maryland)

  • L. Jane Hall


    (Department of Education Policy Studies, University of Maryland)

Registered author(s):

    National Board Certification (NBC) for teachers has become an important innovation in long-standing efforts to improve teacher quality. As states, districts, and teachers increasingly invest resources in this process, information is needed on its cost, impact, and value. This analysis estimates the full opportunity cost of four NBC support programs, examines how the cost burden is distributed, and compares the cost of NBC with the cost of the traditionally dominant approach for teachers' skill development and salary advancement: earning a master's degree. The study demonstrates that the application fee accounts for only 7--13 percent of the total cost of NBC. Costs are shouldered by a range of individuals and organizations, with the greatest burden on NBC candidates themselves. Our comparison with the cost of earning a master's degree suggests that NBC is the less costly approach, with implications for choosing among alternative resource investments to promote, recognize, and reward effective teachers. © 2008 American Education Finance Association

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by MIT Press in its journal Education Finance and Policy.

    Volume (Year): 3 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 3 (July)
    Pages: 339-373

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:3:y:2008:i:3:p:339-373
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:3:y:2008:i:3:p:339-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kristin Waites)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.