IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/veecee/v14y2012i4p289-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do institutions matter for business angel investing in emerging Asian markets?

Author

Listed:
  • William Scheela
  • Thawatchai Jittrapanun

Abstract

We report on business angel (BA) investing in the emerging Asian economy of Thailand. Our research question is: How can BAs survive in an emerging economy, which lacks the fully developed institutions that are necessary to support formal and informal venture capital investing? Institutional theory was used as the framework to expand BA research to an emerging economy. We interviewed 20 Thai Chinese BA investors in 2006 and 2007, and studied their investment strategies. We adopted a mixed-methods research design to analyze the data. Results indicate that the BAs find it a challenge to invest in and operate new ventures in a highly uncertain and competitive environment where there is high political uncertainty, weak legal and financial support for investors and inefficient government support for small- and medium-sized enterprises. In spite of these challenges, BAs generally report strong investment returns. To overcome weak institutional support (institutional void), BA investors develop informal institutions by co-investing and networking with family members and government officials. They also conduct in-depth due diligence before investing and closely monitor their investee companies after investing.

Suggested Citation

  • William Scheela & Thawatchai Jittrapanun, 2012. "Do institutions matter for business angel investing in emerging Asian markets?," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 289-308, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:veecee:v:14:y:2012:i:4:p:289-308
    DOI: 10.1080/13691066.2012.672020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13691066.2012.672020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13691066.2012.672020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Motavaseli Mahmood & Shojaei Saeed & Bitaab Ali & Hasti Chitsazan & Ghanbar Mohammadi Elyasi, 2018. "Institutional Barriers to Financing Technology-based Small Firms through Venture Capital Mechanism: A Study to Explore the Incentives for Investment in Iran," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(1), pages 184-195.
    2. William Scheela & Edmundo Isidro & Thawatchai Jittrapanun & Nguyen Trang, 2015. "Formal and informal venture capital investing in emerging economies in Southeast Asia," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 597-617, September.
    3. Richard Harrison & William Scheela & P. C. Lai & Sivapalan Vivekarajah, 2018. "Beyond institutional voids and the middle-income trap: The emerging business angel market in Malaysia," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 965-991, December.
    4. Zhou, Lu Jolly & Zhang, Xinyu & Sha, Yezhou, 2021. "The role of angel investment for technology-based SMEs: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Douglas Cumming & Minjie Zhang, 2019. "Angel investors around the world," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(5), pages 692-719, July.
    6. Cumming, Douglas & Zhang, Yelin, 2016. "Alternative investments in emerging markets: A review and new trends," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 1-23.
    7. Solodoha, Eliran & Rosenzweig, Stav & Harel, Shai, 2023. "Incentivizing angels to invest in start-ups: Evidence from a natural experiment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:veecee:v:14:y:2012:i:4:p:289-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TVEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.